Mr. Fussnputz Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 Chance favors the prepared mind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighCalebR Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, spilltray said: Not when it moves your stud out of his natural positon Kenny definitely didn't hang out strictly at nose. Lancaster didn't hang out only at 3. I'd probably pass on Leki but he could play some snaps on that 3. Edited January 24, 2020 by HighCalebR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 On 1/22/2020 at 2:26 PM, {Family Ghost} said: Thanks! sorry it's 11:00-11:30 am Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted January 24, 2020 Author Share Posted January 24, 2020 Lily Zhao - Brian Gutekunst mentioned Blake Martinez's expiring contract. Said they'll take "a long look at ILB" to see if it's squared away to help the run defense. Also said the guys along the defensive line have stepped up and will need to continue to step up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted January 24, 2020 Author Share Posted January 24, 2020 Ryan Wood - By my recorder, Packers GM Brian Gutekunst spoke for 30 minutes, 37 seconds recapping the 2019 season and looking ahead to the offseason. Such a refreshing thing, a GM sharing his thoughts on where the team has been, where it will go. The biggest winner, by far, is fans. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 Two things were clear from Gute's presser, assuming his actions match his words: (1) Big focus this off-season on offensive playmakers, especially WR, and (2) Big focus on ILB position. That's 2 of our 3 glaring holes IMO, with the other being another solid IDL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kepler Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 2 hours ago, Arthur Penske said: I don't buy luck. MLF's first year and a new trainer " leading" the room and the team suddenly is the healthiest it's been in like a decade. There's something to it. As TT would have said, the proof is in the pudding. Luck would actually fully account for the situation you just described. A series of these seasons would imply otherwise though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted January 24, 2020 Share Posted January 24, 2020 22 minutes ago, Kepler said: Luck would actually fully account for the situation you just described. A series of these seasons would imply otherwise though. We must have different definitions of luck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted January 25, 2020 Author Share Posted January 25, 2020 Ross Uglem - Packers must stay aggressive to avoid regression I've got bad news for Packers fans. Green Bay is a major candidate for regression in 2020. While I might not agree that the Packers were "fraudulent", the outlying numbers from the 2019 season didn't point to a 13-3 campaign, and if Green Bay doesn't aggressively improve their program during the offseason, they won't see 13 wins in 2020. The Packers perhaps missed an opportunity for that aggressive improvement when they chose to retain defensive coordinator Mike Pettine. Pettine's defense was awful in 2018, and only made its way up to average in 2019 before being throttled by San Francisco in the championship game. Pettine's return could provide stability and an opportunity for growth defensively for Green Bay, but through two seasons remains a major question mark. Why are the Packers such a big-time regression candidate? Green Bay stayed remarkably healthy. They were unsustainably good in one-score games. The numbers (rankings) just aren't that great. ////////////////// Lets face it. Nobody but nobody figured GB to do as well as they did this year and there's not much more "ceiling" space left above our 2019 record. We came up two games short. If we drop back a few games in the win column - but pick up those two games at the end - we'll have regressed but gone further. We'll see how it plays out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MantyWrestler Posted January 25, 2020 Share Posted January 25, 2020 On 1/24/2020 at 8:43 AM, vegas492 said: Kenny Clark is kind of a freak. Powerful. Anchor. With quickness. Can he move around, sure. Should he? Probably not. His combination of skills serves him really well at his current position. I guess I kind of feel the same way. Reason I asked is it’s a lot easier to find that run stopping NT and move KC to 3T than a pass rushing 3 or 5T end who can do what KC does. Any way you would do the previous if the right someone is not available? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spilltray Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 15 hours ago, MantyWrestler said: I guess I kind of feel the same way. Reason I asked is it’s a lot easier to find that run stopping NT and move KC to 3T than a pass rushing 3 or 5T end who can do what KC does. Any way you would do the previous if the right someone is not available? No. You build around your studs and put them in the position to do what they do best. And if Clark is going to be the one staying in on passing downs anyway your new 3/5 T can be your run stuffer types. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 16 hours ago, MantyWrestler said: I guess I kind of feel the same way. Reason I asked is it’s a lot easier to find that run stopping NT and move KC to 3T than a pass rushing 3 or 5T end who can do what KC does. Any way you would do the previous if the right someone is not available? Moving Clark to 3T kinda takes away from his value. At 3T he's just a really good 3T, where as at NT he's a special talent. You need to take advantage of Clark's NT ability by getting him another guy at 3T who can really play in both facets. We've seen putting a fatty next to Clark. Lancaster/Clark is really mediocre. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MantyWrestler Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 53 minutes ago, AlexGreen#20 said: Moving Clark to 3T kinda takes away from his value. At 3T he's just a really good 3T, where as at NT he's a special talent. You need to take advantage of Clark's NT ability by getting him another guy at 3T who can really play in both facets. We've seen putting a fatty next to Clark. Lancaster/Clark is really mediocre. I agree but getting that guy where we pick may be wishful thinking... although, I believe we passed on Chris Jones to take KC so you never know. Finding a NT to replace KC and moving him felt easier that finding those 3T/5T types. Love what you did in your mock to remedy that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 @squire12, make a Packers vs Chiefs GDT. See... See what happens. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted January 26, 2020 Share Posted January 26, 2020 (edited) 20 minutes ago, Outpost31 said: @squire12, make a Packers vs Chiefs GDT. See... See what happens. and during the super bowl lets comment on the game as if its happening in the Mandela universe complete with Leaders play updates Edited January 26, 2020 by Malfatron 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.