Jump to content

Random Packer News & Notes


Leader

Recommended Posts

One more running-stats note.  Ski's graph is based on yardage.  Running stats routinely list total and average, YPA. 

When considering Dillon/Jones, they have been notably lacking in long runs.   An occasional long-run makes a world of difference in yards and YPA and in every running-game stat.  And for good reason, because big plays can win games.  

But the fact that Dillon/Jones still have kinda favorable running stats, relative to their bad blocking, without the assistance of some 50-yard runs, is significant.  A couple of possibly fluky long runs might have made their stats look way better.  

Sometimes I'd like to see what the MEDIAN YPA was, instead of just the AVERAGE YPA.  A team can get a 5.0 YPA with one 81 yard long run and 19 1-yard runs.  The 19 one-yard runs might set up a whole lot of punts.  Other team might have a 4.2 YPA, with 16 four-yard runs, 2 no-yard runs, and a couple of 12-yard runs.  It might be that the team with 18-of-20 runs being ≥4 yards might actually be better able to sustain consistent offense than the team with the big run but otherwise lots of crummy runs?  

Those numbers are extreme, but I kinda feel like the Packers have tended more towards the "median-run" profile.  Lots of 3-4-5 yard runs, without many long ones. A lot of those 3-4-5 yard runs don't pound the opponent, and don't that often get past the 1st-down-markers.  But they do enable a lot of 2nd-and-3rd situations where it doesn't take a very long pass to make a first down and keep the drive moving.   

A team has what, ~450-500 first downs in a season?  Each leads to either a score, another first down, a punt, or a turnover.  Over a season, 4 long runs impact <1% of those 450-500 first down scenarios.  I think the Packers orientation towards more of a "decent-median-run" run game maybe supports Rodgers with a lot of opportunities to have manageable 2nd and 3rd downs.?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andrew Brandt -   The Packers have 3 Pro Bowlers, down from 7 last year. The other four are still there, just injured this year. In other words, the Packers have the best record in the NFL without 4 of their top 7 players. MVP and Coach of the Year seem theirs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bill Huber -   Did you know Matt LaFleur’s teams are 17-5 in games decided by one score? That .773 winning percentage is the best in the NFL. For some context, the Packers have played the 19th-most one-score games but have the third-most wins and the fewest losses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Leader said:

Bill Huber -   Did you know Matt LaFleur’s teams are 17-5 in games decided by one score? That .773 winning percentage is the best in the NFL. For some context, the Packers have played the 19th-most one-score games but have the third-most wins and the fewest losses.

That’s nice. 
 

Can we win some more by 2+ scores please?

Sincerely,

My congested arteries

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, mikebpackfan said:

That’s nice. 
 

Can we win some more by 2+ scores please?

Sincerely,

My congested arteries

Starting with today's Xmas game and then 3+ scores more vs the Vikings.  Now THAT would be a sweet present.

Edited by coachbuns
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/22/2021 at 10:29 AM, craig said:

One more running-stats note.  Ski's graph is based on yardage.  Running stats routinely list total and average, YPA. 

When considering Dillon/Jones, they have been notably lacking in long runs.   An occasional long-run makes a world of difference in yards and YPA and in every running-game stat.  And for good reason, because big plays can win games.  

But the fact that Dillon/Jones still have kinda favorable running stats, relative to their bad blocking, without the assistance of some 50-yard runs, is significant.  A couple of possibly fluky long runs might have made their stats look way better.  

Sometimes I'd like to see what the MEDIAN YPA was, instead of just the AVERAGE YPA.  A team can get a 5.0 YPA with one 81 yard long run and 19 1-yard runs.  The 19 one-yard runs might set up a whole lot of punts.  Other team might have a 4.2 YPA, with 16 four-yard runs, 2 no-yard runs, and a couple of 12-yard runs.  It might be that the team with 18-of-20 runs being ≥4 yards might actually be better able to sustain consistent offense than the team with the big run but otherwise lots of crummy runs?  

Those numbers are extreme, but I kinda feel like the Packers have tended more towards the "median-run" profile.  Lots of 3-4-5 yard runs, without many long ones. A lot of those 3-4-5 yard runs don't pound the opponent, and don't that often get past the 1st-down-markers.  But they do enable a lot of 2nd-and-3rd situations where it doesn't take a very long pass to make a first down and keep the drive moving.   

A team has what, ~450-500 first downs in a season?  Each leads to either a score, another first down, a punt, or a turnover.  Over a season, 4 long runs impact <1% of those 450-500 first down scenarios.  I think the Packers orientation towards more of a "decent-median-run" run game maybe supports Rodgers with a lot of opportunities to have manageable 2nd and 3rd downs.?  

Issue being the difference between 2nd and 10 and 2nd and 8 isn't that significant.

Explosive plays are what drives offenses

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...