Jump to content

Random Packer News & Notes


Leader

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, Pugger said:

You gotta think with all of these contractual moves Gute and company are trying to keep AR around and that Love may not be ready for prime time.  We shall see.

We have to make the moves regardless to get under the cap. Restructuring contracts doesn't mean we're married to bringing 12 back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andrew Brandt has flip flopped a bit of late, but seems to be back to thinking that Aaron and the Packers are going to breakup.  In this tweet he says that the Packers are working it with a series of leaks.  Maybe the Packers have always wanted to move on this winter/spring?  If so they may have played this things very well and potentially maximized their trade return.  

 

 
coI2z_s3_normal.jpg
 
Reporting on Packers/Aaron... "Aaron definitely wants to stay!" "Aaron is torn!" "Packers not engaging in trade talks." "If there were trade talks -- but they're not -- they would be with Denver, Tennessee or Pittsburgh." "But did we mention..no trade talks!" Packers working it..
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/5/2022 at 12:48 PM, CWood21 said:

Why would trading Rodgers prevent (or keep) the Packers from tagging Adams?  We either get a '23 comp pick (likely a 3rd round pick) or immediate draft picks for him by tagging and trading him?  It seems pretty clear which is the right answer.

The problem with your scenario is the salary cap, among other things. This whole tag and trade thing is pipe dreaming by fans, if they create the space to tag him it is to keep him.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, R T said:

The problem with your scenario is the salary cap, among other things. This whole tag and trade thing is pipe dreaming by fans, if they create the space to tag him it is to keep him.    

unless Rodgers is also moving on and the clearing of the cap is to reset things going forward

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You'd have to think that is a Packers leak, but who really knows?  Andrew Brandt seemed to think the Packers have been leaking a lot of this stuff of late.  Maybe the Packers expect Rodgers to bolt, and are trying to get the word out there to fans that they offered him a huge deal for him to stay and he passed it up.  The Packers don't want to look like the bad guy.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, {Family Ghost} said:

You'd have to think that is a Packers leak, but who really knows?  Andrew Brandt seemed to think the Packers have been leaking a lot of this stuff of late.  Maybe the Packers expect Rodgers to bolt, and are trying to get the word out there to fans that they offered him a huge deal for him to stay and he passed it up.  The Packers don't want to look like the bad guy.

They won't. The backlash last off-season was entirely on Gute, this season it's entirely on Aaron. 

Maybe Gute has wanted him gone all along and is just an evil genius? Now he can get rid of him with no push back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Old Guy said:

The National Media has turned on Rodgers this time. The Packers front office did everything he asked and MORE.

They did that right after his training camp presser last year - when he dissed them as charlatans and liars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Packerraymond said:

They won't. The backlash last off-season was entirely on Gute, this season it's entirely on Aaron. 

Maybe Gute has wanted him gone all along and is just an evil genius? Now he can get rid of him with no push back.

That's what I've been thinking ... Gute, Murphy and Ball want to ship him off.  LaFleur has been the biggest groveler of the bunch.  Gute slips up now and again and says something Aaron could take offense to.  Hopefully they ship the guy off for a haul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the GB brass brings ol Rodg back at all costs burying this team in a bloated contract with him and a can that will be a barrel down the road it is clearly malpractice.  The only way it makes good sense to bring Rodg back is on a team friendly deal, and that includes what we do with the rest of the team.

That being said, I hope I'm wrong and as others stated above Gute and Murph are playing their cards ad holding them tight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, R T said:

The problem with your scenario is the salary cap, among other things. This whole tag and trade thing is pipe dreaming by fans, if they create the space to tag him it is to keep him.    

The question is who would trade for him ?

Doesn't really make sense to me. When you trade picks for a player you are trading for the contract and he doesn't have a contract. You are acquiring the rights to sign him to a massive contract. Its debatable whether Adams given his age is worth what is essentially QB money. If its debatable whether he is worth the contract doesn't that make his trade value negligible. Not sure its worth more than a 3rd round pick to get the rights to sign a WR to a monster contract.

For me, to give up a pick in the first round or probably even in the second round, it would need to be an all-in team or it doesn't really make sense. A few years down the line, his contract probably looks very bad and you've lost pick/s so it needs to be a team chasing a title in 22. 

I've no idea whether a tag and trade is viable, always some crazy teams around but it seems unpractical to me unless there is an all-in team very keen and with the resources.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...