Leader Posted March 11, 2022 Author Share Posted March 11, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted March 11, 2022 Author Share Posted March 11, 2022 Anybody think that 17 & 12 are not lining up their contract negotiations......? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Family Ghost} Posted March 11, 2022 Share Posted March 11, 2022 Rodgers better not have an out clause after 2022. That would be bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Family Ghost} Posted March 11, 2022 Share Posted March 11, 2022 Just now, Leader said: Anybody think that 17 & 12 are not lining up their contract negotiations......? I don't think Rodgers plays more than one or two years. Adams is going to want four or five if he can get it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wgbeethree Posted March 11, 2022 Share Posted March 11, 2022 1 hour ago, Mr Bad Example said: BBQ A Nathan's with BBQ and honey mustard has been my go to for awhile. The last place I worked did a really great elk chili and we'd make chili dogs with that and a white cheddar/gruyere mix but to get the right chili:hot dog:cheese ratio it got sloppy and you'd need to eat it with a knife and a fork. It was delicious but something about that just feels wrong. Not eating pizza with a knife and a fork wrong but wrong none the less. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugger Posted March 11, 2022 Share Posted March 11, 2022 On 3/9/2022 at 2:54 PM, ThatJerkDave said: Pugger, are you sure? You do know that the Broncos traded for Russell Wilson, right? 🤣 Come on guys! Give this senile old lady a break! 😄 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugger Posted March 11, 2022 Share Posted March 11, 2022 On 3/9/2022 at 5:12 PM, Shanedorf said: This forum in one sentence: “If you don't get what you want, you suffer; if you get what you don't want, you suffer; even when you get exactly what you want, you still suffer because you can't hold on to it forever.” You are making my head hurt. lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugger Posted March 11, 2022 Share Posted March 11, 2022 On 3/9/2022 at 11:42 PM, ThatJerkDave said: I like to put pepper in my ketchup. Makes it really good. My sister used to do that. 😛 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugger Posted March 11, 2022 Share Posted March 11, 2022 11 hours ago, Brit Pack said: Having a look at Mahommes deal I think Rodgers gets something very similar in terms of stucture and payouts and cap hits. Patrick Mahomes signed a 10 year, $450,000,000 contract with the Kansas City Chiefs, including a $10,000,000 signing bonus, $141,481,905 guaranteed, and an average annual salary of $45,000,000. This is his first 5 years of his deal: 2020 - base salary $825k, singing bonus $4.2m, cap hit $5.3m 2021 – base salary $990k, signing bonus $6.4m, cap hit $7.4m 2022 – base salary $1.5m, signing bonus $6.4m, roster bonus $27m, cap hit $35m 2023 – base salary $5.5m, signing bonus $6.4m, roster bonus $34.4m, cap hit $46.7m 2024 – base salary $2.5m, signing bonus $6.4mm roster bonus $34.9m, cap hit $44.3m, dead cap $10m 2025 - base salary $2.5m, signing bonus $4.4mm roster bonus $38.9m, cap hit $46m, dead cap 4.3m After 2025 Mahommes has $0 dead cap hit! In essence it is a 5 year $183m contract, AAV $36.6m, with the remaiing $294m paid out over the final 6 years at an AAV of $49M I could see Rodger doing a deal that has two years low cap hits, some signing bonus and then guaranteed roster bonus on a yearly basis as long as he is and wants to be on the team Oh yes, this is a football forum and not a culinary one! lol It will be interesting to see what the numbers are for AR's new contract once it is signed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugger Posted March 11, 2022 Share Posted March 11, 2022 6 hours ago, vegas492 said: So...no more Mack in the division..... We won't miss that guy for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugger Posted March 11, 2022 Share Posted March 11, 2022 4 hours ago, Leader said: I just don't know if he has any kind of market right now. With the present FA QBs out there and the mediocre QB class in this year's draft he may have more value for us than anyone else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas492 Posted March 11, 2022 Share Posted March 11, 2022 15 hours ago, Old Guy said: How did that original Mack trade work out for the Bears? LOL They get a 2nd this year and a 6th next year. Teams in the Central are working on a roster for 2026 now that Rodgers is back. The Mack trade was not bad for them. Their miscalculation was at QB and HC. Not Mack. That defense was championship plus level for a few years. It was the offense that held them back. You put Mahomes over there, or Watson and I have little doubt that they would have been winning multiple playoff games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted March 11, 2022 Share Posted March 11, 2022 11 minutes ago, vegas492 said: The Mack trade was not bad for them. Their miscalculation was at QB and HC. Not Mack. That defense was championship plus level for a few years. It was the offense that held them back. You put Mahomes over there, or Watson and I have little doubt that they would have been winning multiple playoff games. Isn't that the point? You have to tune up all those parts together. If you tune up the defense while the offense is still crap, you end up on the treadmill. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas492 Posted March 11, 2022 Share Posted March 11, 2022 2 minutes ago, AlexGreen#20 said: Isn't that the point? You have to tune up all those parts together. If you tune up the defense while the offense is still crap, you end up on the treadmill. Yes. That is the point. They thought they had something with Trubisky, so they pushed their chips all in with Mack. Mack held up his end of the deal. Trubisky and/or the HC did not. To me, that isn't on Mack or that trade. It's totally on the front office thinking they had something good in Mitch and/or the HC. If anyone would like to do it, I'd love to see a breakdown of that trade now. Bears get Mack. Vegas gets a ton of picks. Who did they end of taking? Bears trade Mack to get back some picks. I don't know the full scope of how that all looks, but I would think that if you look at Mack's production and then add in the picks the Bears just got for dealing him, the deal isn't bad. But I freely admit that I could be very wrong about that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandy Posted March 11, 2022 Share Posted March 11, 2022 1 minute ago, AlexGreen#20 said: Isn't that the point? You have to tune up all those parts together. If you tune up the defense while the offense is still crap, you end up on the treadmill. Yeah but it's not like they tried to fail at picking a QB and coach. Id rather be a fan of a team that went for it all and failed than one that always looks to the future waiting for the stars to align. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.