ThatJerkDave Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 6 hours ago, incognito_man said: How much money does cutting him today save vs after the season? It isn't about the money, it is about teaching him a lesson! Cut him so he doesn't get hurt again! That will show him! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Family Ghost} Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 48 minutes ago, skibrett15 said: The best option is, and remains to trade him. And barring that, keep him and play him You have to wonder if he could even pass a physical at this point. He's probably stuck in GB this year .. let's hope he reaches a healthy streak here pretty soon. Otherwise it's just a huge waste of a contract. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 48 minutes ago, {Family Ghost} said: You have to wonder if he could even pass a physical at this point. He's probably stuck in GB this year .. let's hope he reaches a healthy streak here pretty soon. Otherwise it's just a huge waste of a contract. No ******* way he'd clear one in a trade right now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kepler Posted September 22 Share Posted September 22 Anybody who believes we could actually trade him to a willing partner is literally retarded. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted September 22 Share Posted September 22 14 hours ago, Mr. Fussnputz said: First we learn that Bahk's knee is so bad that he can't practice, but don't worry. He doesn't need to practice. Now we learn that his knee is so bad that he can't play either, well maybe a few games, so long as there's plenty of "rest games" in between so his knee can recover. As much as I like Bahk, it's time to negotiate an injury settlement and release him with an injury designation. His knee isn't ever going to get any better. More likely it's going to degenerate over time. This is a rebuilding year. Let's see what Walker can do. By next April's draft we need to know if Walker is capable. Him playing 75% of the games at 75% is still better than most players playing 100% of the games at 100%. And at this point, it's a sunk cost. There's a reason why the Packers didn't add any void years to his contract this past offseason when they needed additional cap space. Let him play out this year, and then see if there's a market for him in the offseason. You trade/cut him in the offseason, you save $21.5M. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted September 22 Share Posted September 22 3 hours ago, Kepler said: Anybody who believes we could actually trade him to a willing partner is literally retarded. I think it depends on how many games he plays this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Fussnputz Posted September 22 Share Posted September 22 (edited) 7 hours ago, CWood21 said: Him playing 75% of the games at 75% is still better than most players playing 100% of the games at 100%. And at this point, it's a sunk cost. There's a reason why the Packers didn't add any void years to his contract this past offseason when they needed additional cap space. Let him play out this year, and then see if there's a market for him in the offseason. You trade/cut him in the offseason, you save $21.5M. Let's hope he plays 75% of the games. So far he's played 50% of the games. Edited September 22 by Mr. Fussnputz Added a thought. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skibrett15 Posted September 22 Share Posted September 22 10 hours ago, CWood21 said: I think it depends on how many games he plays this year. I think he needs to be traded this season, nobody is trading for him in the offseason to get a 20M part time player for 40M for 1 year. This year, his salary is lower and someone might be desperate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted September 22 Share Posted September 22 2 minutes ago, skibrett15 said: I think he needs to be traded this season, nobody is trading for him in the offseason to get a 20M part time player for 40M for 1 year. This year, his salary is lower and someone might be desperate You know whoever trades for him inherits that contract for next year correct? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skibrett15 Posted September 22 Share Posted September 22 1 minute ago, Packerraymond said: You know whoever trades for him inherits that contract for next year correct? yeah I think it's a long shot but much more likely if they get part of this year too. Nobody is taking just that next year deal at this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted September 22 Share Posted September 22 Just now, skibrett15 said: yeah I think it's a long shot but much more likely if they get part of this year too. Nobody is taking just that next year deal at this point. Odds are so small they really aren't worth discussing. Bakh will play here this year. Next year I honestly think coming back here on a re-worked deal or retirement are going to be his only options. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig Posted September 22 Share Posted September 22 (edited) 11 hours ago, CWood21 said: ...it's a sunk cost.... Yes. It happens. It's the National Injury League. Every deal has injury risk. Every good player gets signing-bonus, and every contender uses signing-bonus that pushes out cap hits. It can't be undone. I don't blame Bakhti, nor expect Packers to get out from the cap hit. *IF* we get some games from him, be glad for whatever. If we don't, too bad. Edited September 22 by craig Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted September 22 Author Share Posted September 22 Dont ask me..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneTwoSixFive Posted September 22 Share Posted September 22 (edited) So does Bakhtiari play on Sunday, or next Thursday ? It seems unlikely he plays both, though both are home games. Edited September 22 by OneTwoSixFive Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted September 22 Share Posted September 22 5 minutes ago, OneTwoSixFive said: So does Bakhtiari play on Sunday, or next Thursday ? It seems unlikely he plays both, though both are home games. The answer "no" is also a high potential option Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.