incognito_man Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 1 minute ago, Outpost31 said: It wasn’t MM. That left-handed pass yesterday was a sack the last 4 seasons. We (I think) got a TD on that drive, whereas we would have punted had he taken that sack. He is noticeably focusing on the RBs in the passing game more while simultaneously acknowledging "I've had a lot of statistical success in the league now I just want to win." Rodgers pretty much confirming @Outpost31's takes. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnar Danneskjold Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 3 minutes ago, Outpost31 said: That’s what I’ve been saying for 3 ****ing years. Once Davante is ready to go, Davante going to ****ing go. It has been sort of obvious. Yesterday he played more like Drew Brees, and gee, it worked. MM and Rodgers became infatuated with his ability to extend a play, and their metric about how explosive plays affect a game. They failed to contextualize the metric. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 Did Greg actually say/imply this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 22 minutes ago, Outpost31 said: It wasn’t MM. Huh? Then why has Rodgers play mysteriously change when MLF became HC? Did he start reading your FF posts or something? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReadyToThump Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 9 minutes ago, packfanfb said: That's my right tackle! And he's from Iowa!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 17 minutes ago, Arthur Penske said: Huh? Then why has Rodgers play mysteriously change when MLF became HC? Did he start reading your FF posts or something? Because LaFleur isn’t complacent and does a better job relaying the importance of this to Rodgers. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 40 minutes ago, Ragnar Danneskjold said: It has been sort of obvious. Yesterday he played more like Drew Brees, and gee, it worked. MM and Rodgers became infatuated with his ability to extend a play, and their metric about how explosive plays affect a game. They failed to contextualize the metric. The explosive play metric is very much still alive. Our drives with/without a 20 yard play is gross. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 5 minutes ago, Outpost31 said: Because LaFleur isn’t complacent and does a better job relaying the importance of this to Rodgers. Soo you’re saying it was on MM? Ha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 23 minutes ago, Arthur Penske said: Huh? Then why has Rodgers play mysteriously change when MLF became HC? Did he start reading your FF posts or something? Because Adams was injured today, and because instead of using RBs as check downs, we're seeing them used more as primary targets 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 25 minutes ago, packfanfb said: Is Bulaga > Bakhtiari? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dubz41 Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 Just now, incognito_man said: Is Bulaga > Bakhtiari? So far this year? YES. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 Just now, Arthur Penske said: Soo you’re saying it was on MM? Ha You really never follow along at all, do you? It was not by McCarthy's design to not feature backs in the passing game. You can sit and act like Rodgers was innocent in all this all you want, but it's simply not the case and all evidence points to Rodgers flat out refusing to work with McCarthy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingOfTheNorth Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 1 minute ago, Outpost31 said: You really never follow along at all, do you? It was not by McCarthy's design to not feature backs in the passing game. You can sit and act like Rodgers was innocent in all this all you want, but it's simply not the case and all evidence points to Rodgers flat out refusing to work with McCarthy. Not sure anyone is acting like Rodgers is innocent. But when someone is hired to coach, he should be held accountable when he fails to do so. LaFleur's ability to coach Rodgers into passing to his RBs, should be proof enough that MM was failing at it. Seems like the blame should fall at both Rodgers and MMs feet. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnar Danneskjold Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 31 minutes ago, AlexGreen#20 said: The explosive play metric is very much still alive. Our drives with/without a 20 yard play is gross. I don't dispute that they are important. My opinion is that whomever (I use that term to avoid the inevitable argument about the MM/Rodgers balance) lost sight of how the successful non explosive plays help set up the explosive plays. At some level, you have to keep your QB healthy, and the chains moving until the explosive play opens up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.