Jump to content

Random Packer News & Notes


Leader

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, packfanfb said:

And explosive athletes. 

We still really don't have that type of guy other than MVS. You could make the argument that after Adams/Jones and probably MVS, Tyler Ervin would probably be our No. 4 "most explosive" offensive threat. 

There are not 19 teams that have less explosive players than Adams/Jones and a QB as allegedly good as Rodgers and an offensive line as good as ours was.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tartarus said:

Which playoff teams from this past postseason had less explosive players than GB - Buffalo and NE?

Let's hope MVS makes one giant leap for Packer nation.  

49ers? Titans? Seattle? 

Edited by HighCalebR
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, HighCalebR said:

I'll give Seattle on par, maybe slightly better. 

Kittle and who? Titans aj brown and who

Kittle and Deebo were better than our two best receiving options last year, no? I believe both were fairly high in YAC last year. 

The big guy Henry who runs the ball a lot. I heard he's decent

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, HighCalebR said:

Easily a better squad than Seattle right now as a whole.

As a whole yes but I'd say Metcalf, Lockett and Carson are a pretty darn good cast of offensive weapons. 

If MVS takes that big leap we need we'll be looking much better. To me there's just too many unknowns right now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

4 minutes ago, Tartarus said:

Kittle and Deebo were better than our two best receiving options last year, no? I believe both were fairly high in YAC last year. 

The big guy Henry who runs the ball a lot. I heard he's decent

Davante got hurt, and we switched up our 2 over the course of the year and Lazard averages about what Deebo does. If Deebo was a Packer youd say he was a slot guy that had opportunities because of the lack of power ahead of him, similar the argument against our guys stats.

Theres a negative spin for everything if you want. 

Idk if youve noticed but we had a pretty decent run game as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tartarus said:

As a whole yes but I'd say Metcalf, Lockett and Carson are a pretty darn good cast of offensive weapons. 

If MVS takes that big leap we need we'll be looking much better. To me there's just too many unknowns right now

Id take jones over Carson and Davante over Metcalf. Lockett, sure hes better than our 2, i gave you that but its also not an astounding gap.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we all understand our 2, whoever it may be, has to step up and take the job. I also dont see this huge discrepancy in talent to a lot of other teams with the style of football we're trying to play. If you want to argue were going against the times with the scheme were going with i probably agree 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Tartarus said:

Which playoff teams from this past postseason had less explosive players than GB - Buffalo and NE?

Let's hope MVS makes one giant leap for Packer nation.  

 

Buffalo actually put some good athletes out there... Brown, McKenzie & Knox at TE was pretty decent. Definitely better than the Packers... Adding Diggs to that group was a heck of move. That offense could be real dangerous this year.

One of the most disgusting snap count numbers in 2019 was Allison, Kumerow and Shepperd getting over 1,000 snaps at WR in 2019- the horror!

It's criminal the junk Rodgers has had to throw to the past few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Donzo said:

 

Buffalo actually put some good athletes out there... Brown, McKenzie & Knox at TE was pretty decent. Definitely better than the Packers... Adding Diggs to that group was a heck of move. That offense could be real dangerous this year.

One of the most disgusting snap count numbers in 2019 was Allison, Kumerow and Shepperd getting over 1,000 snaps at WR in 2019- the horror!

It's criminal the junk Rodgers has had to throw to the past few years.

I love how you keep adding shepherds 50 snaps to this. Throw Trevor Davis in too while you're at it.

Jaleel Scott, Miles Boykin and Willie Sneed combined for 1000 snaps for the Ravens, THE HORROR

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HighCalebR said:

I love how you keep adding shepherds 50 snaps to this. Throw Trevor Davis in too while you're at it.

Jaleel Scott, Miles Boykin and Willie Sneed combined for 1000 snaps for the Ravens, THE HORROR

Yeah but those aren't solely the Packers ****ty snaps so they don't count

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...