Jump to content

BDL 2018 Contract Negotiations/Transactions


SirA1

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Hockey5djh said:

Dumb question.....don't the things we just voted on go into affect next season, not this season?

Its a 2019 3 up so it is for next season. Im choosing to pay a guy 8500 more this year because it will save me about that in the long run. 

Edited by SirA1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/6/2018 at 9:20 PM, SirA1 said:

Singapore Sentinels 2019 3 Up #1

Edge Danielle Hunter

Current BDL deal = $686/1

NFL Contract = $72,000/5 years + $1,907/1 year (2018) = $73,907/6 years = $12,318/year

New BDL Contract Offer = 6 Years $54,434 ($9,239/yr) 75% Annual Salary

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/minnesota-vikings/danielle-hunter-16812/

Approved: Bcb, MD4L, JLash

Abstained: Ragnarok

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/7/2018 at 6:15 PM, WFLukic said:

Lew Jazz 3up no.1

Travis Frederick

Current = 7100/3

Irl Avg = 9400/per (6 yrs)

0.75*9400 = 7050

New Offer = 7100g

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/dallas-cowboys/travis-frederick-12311/

After digging into all that old BDL Owners meeting stuff I actually found a vote on a rule to limit 3 Ups to 1 year or less but it got voted down. So while foolish, it technically isn't illegal to 3 Up a player with more than 1 year. Lukic also wisely followed the rule that a new contract can't pay the player less per year that he's already making in the BDL by matching his current salary.

By those reasons I approve the Frederick deal.

Approved: Bcb, SirA1

One more approval needed.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, SirA1 said:

After digging into all that old BDL Owners meeting stuff I actually found a vote on a rule to limit 3 Ups to 1 year or less but it got voted down. So while foolish, it technically isn't illegal to 3 Up a player with more than 1 year. Lukic also wisely followed the rule that a new contract can't pay the player less per year that he's already making in the BDL by matching his current salary.

By those reasons I approve the Frederick deal.

Approved: Bcb, SirA1

One more approval needed.

 

Why would a player in Frederick’s position accept a 3 year extension at the same price? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, MD4L said:

Why would a player in Frederick’s position accept a 3 year extension at the same price? 

Has nothing to do with reality. He could wait 3 years and still pay him the same amount per year. Actually less if he waited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SirA1 said:

After digging into all that old BDL Owners meeting stuff I actually found a vote on a rule to limit 3 Ups to 1 year or less but it got voted down. So while foolish, it technically isn't illegal to 3 Up a player with more than 1 year. Lukic also wisely followed the rule that a new contract can't pay the player less per year that he's already making in the BDL by matching his current salary.

Just a personal thought, I feel like this happens way too often.

"Rule X is in question"
"Its listed in the rules as Y"
"But this is how we've previously done it"
"Ruling is made on rule X based on previous discussions not listed in the current rules document"

The Frederick deal is not legal according to what's in the rules document right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Hockey5djh said:

Just a personal thought, I feel like this happens way too often.

"Rule X is in question"
"Its listed in the rules as Y"
"But this is how we've previously done it"
"Ruling is made on rule X based on previous discussions not listed in the current rules document"

The Frederick deal is not legal according to what's in the rules document right now. 

How so? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎8‎/‎17‎/‎2018 at 2:34 PM, SirA1 said:

How so? 

 

Quote

 

  • 3 Up (All year round) : Each year, an owner has the chance to resign 3 players at a discount rate.

    • If the player is an upcoming free agent that is not coming out of his BDL rookie deal, he can be signed at 75% of the value of his remaining IRL contract

    • If a player is under BDL rookie contract but has just signed a new contract IRL, he can be signed at 75% of the value the IRL contract

    • When 3 Upping a player who was RFA eligible but not tendered, the 3 Up offer may not include the value of the a RFA tender.

    • A player who is 3 upped for a single year by a team, upon signing a new contract in the NFL their BDL 3 up contract can be updated for the change in contract.

    • If a player is a free agent coming out of his BDL rookie contract and has signed a new deal IRL before the year of the 3up, then the owner has to pay 75% of the total IRL contract but end the contract the same year in BDL than IRL. For instance, player X has a BDL rookie contract from 2014 to 2019 at $2000 per year and signed a new deal IRL in 2018 at $10M per year for 6 years. You can either 3up him in 2018 at $7,500 per year for 6 years or in 2019 at $9,000 per year for 5 years.

    • For players under the NFL Franchise Tag they can be 3 Upped for 100% the value of the Franchise tag. If the are signed to a long term deal during the same season their BDL Contract will revert to 75% of the IRL value of they new contract. This is done to prevent any issues with going over the BDL Salary cap.

Players who are submitted to the contract committee as 3 Ups are not included in the free agent pool. However, if the contract committee and the team have not agreed on a 3 Up contract by the start of Shark Tank, then that player will be considered eligible for bidding in the Shark Tank.

 


Travis Frederick

- Not an upcoming FA
- Not under his BDL rookie contract
- Not RFA eligible
- Didn't just sign a new NFL contract
- Not under his BDL rookie contract
- Not under the NFL franchise tag

Explain to me how he's eligible to be 3upped again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...