Green19 Posted March 23, 2018 Share Posted March 23, 2018 3 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: Agree with your first 4, but I'd swap Davenport for Jackson. Don't see us being very high on Jackson. That’s fair. I just think he meets every measurement they have for boundary corners. I get if people don’t like his style of play but I think when you take into consideration everything... I bet Jackson is a solid first on GB’s board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted March 23, 2018 Share Posted March 23, 2018 20 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: Agree with your first 4, but I'd swap Davenport for Jackson. Don't see us being very high on Jackson. For some reason I have this feeling Washington is going to grab Davenport at 13. They lost Murphy in FA. Davenport makes a lot of sense there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted March 23, 2018 Share Posted March 23, 2018 26 minutes ago, bkobow05 said: Man, I wish Fanspeak was real. 1.14 - Tremaine Edmunds | LB | Virginia Tech 2.45 - Carlton Davis | CB | Auburn 3.76 - Mike Gesicki | TE | Penn State 4.101 - DaeSean Hamilton | WR | Penn State 4.133 - Kemoko Turay | EDGE | Rutgers 5.138 - DeShon Elliott | SAF | Texas 5.172 - Isaac Yiadom | CB | Boston College 5.174 - Holton Hill | CB/SAF | Texas 6.186 - Kahlil McKenzie | DT | Tennessee 6.207 - Sean Welsh | OG | Iowa 7.232 - Jaleel Scott | WR | New Mexico State 7.239 - Oren Burks | LB | Vanderbilt Every once in a blue moon I stop on that site and do a mock. It's always ridiculous lmao. 1.14 - Tremaine Edmunds | LB | Virginia Tech2.45 - Mike Hughes | CB | UCF3.76 - DJ Moore | WR | Maryland4.101 - Lorenzo Carter | EDGE | Georgia4.133 - Anthony Averett | CB | Alabama5.138 - Uchenna Nwosu | LB | USC5.172 - Kentavius Street | DL | NC State5.174 - Kevin Toliver | CB| LSU6.186 - Simmie Cobbs Jr | WR | Indiana6.207 - Tyquan Lewis | EDGE| Ohio State7.232 - Equanimeous St. Brown | WR | Notre Dame7.239 - Austin Corbett | OL | Nevada LOL imagine that draft. I got our day 1 starting RG at pick 239. Such a worthless site but it provides a good laugh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted March 23, 2018 Share Posted March 23, 2018 I don't understand why it's so hard for it to actually become semi accurate. Or is that the point? So you keep doing it because of the dream scenarios? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted March 23, 2018 Share Posted March 23, 2018 3 minutes ago, NormSizedMidget said: I don't understand why it's so hard for it to actually become semi accurate. Or is that the point? So you keep doing it because of the dream scenarios? Wouldn't surprise me. Site traffic means $$$. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted March 23, 2018 Share Posted March 23, 2018 34 minutes ago, Green19 said: I think I am pretty confident I have the packers pick down to 5 players given the moves and projections of players. In no order: Derwin James, Harold Landry, Tremaine Edmunds, Vander Esch and Josh Jackson. * I don’t believe Ward will be there for them. I think they would need to trade up in the top ten for him and that’s unlikely. I'd love the guy but personally I don't see any chance in hell James makes it past Oakland and SF. He seems like a guy Gruden would absolutely love and SF will need to fill Reid's spot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted March 23, 2018 Share Posted March 23, 2018 Just now, packfanfb said: I'd love the guy but personally I don't see any chance in hell James makes it past Oakland and SF. He seems like a guy Gruden would absolutely love and SF will need to fill Reid's spot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted March 23, 2018 Share Posted March 23, 2018 1 minute ago, NormSizedMidget said: I don't understand why it's so hard for it to actually become semi accurate. Or is that the point? So you keep doing it because of the dream scenarios? I don't know man, feels like a cool idea for a site. Their boards are so bad and their team needs aren't great either but they've been that way for years and there's no changing it. Now it's just a fun joke to take up 10 minutes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shanedorf Posted March 23, 2018 Share Posted March 23, 2018 8 minutes ago, bkobow05 said: Wouldn't surprise me. Site traffic means $$$. Of course. They want to give all the draftniks some free candy so they keep coming back.... There's no reward for being accurate, but there is for being high traffic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green19 Posted March 23, 2018 Share Posted March 23, 2018 1 hour ago, packfanfb said: I'd love the guy but personally I don't see any chance in hell James makes it past Oakland and SF. He seems like a guy Gruden would absolutely love and SF will need to fill Reid's spot. I agree of the 5 he is the least likely. But you never know how position value plays out in the draft. He might fall. ive seen mocks of guys I respect showing Ward, Nelson, Smith, Edmunds and Davenport all to those teams. Plus some have Alexander and Hughes getting up there as the second CB. So you never know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted March 24, 2018 Share Posted March 24, 2018 10 hours ago, moretti19 said: So if both Davenport and Landry are sitting at 14 who would you prefer taking and why? My pick would be Landry because of his bend and should be able to instantly be a threat to quarterbacks. I'll take Landry, but I think it depends on what you're looking for out of your pass rushers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tfalkgopack Posted March 24, 2018 Share Posted March 24, 2018 8 hours ago, Packerraymond said: I don't know man, feels like a cool idea for a site. Their boards are so bad and their team needs aren't great either but they've been that way for years and there's no changing it. Now it's just a fun joke to take up 10 minutes. I feel that first-pick is much more accurate when it comes to the board. You get too much in trades, but if you refrain from abusing them you can have a pretty “realistic” result Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TransientTexan Posted March 24, 2018 Share Posted March 24, 2018 10 hours ago, moretti19 said: So if both Davenport and Landry are sitting at 14 who would you prefer taking and why? My pick would be Landry because of his bend and should be able to instantly be a threat to quarterbacks. Yea same here. I like the bend. Davenport relies a bit too much on power for my tastes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodjahs12 Posted March 24, 2018 Share Posted March 24, 2018 Anyone else here high on Courtland Sutton? Seems like everyone has their guy at WR but I hardly notice him ever mentioned. Think he’s got a great chance to develop into a special player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fattlipp Posted March 24, 2018 Share Posted March 24, 2018 11 hours ago, Packerraymond said: I don't know man, feels like a cool idea for a site. Their boards are so bad and their team needs aren't great either but they've been that way for years and there's no changing it. Now it's just a fun joke to take up 10 minutes. There are 10+ boards you can use, or the compilation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.