Jump to content

#6 for Brady & Bill


Asciimo

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, PapaShogun said:

Packers I think have 12 titles. If you're talking Super Bowl era, maybe. Greatest dynasty is different from greatest franchise. Patriots were around for years and years before 2001, and didn't have a single title. Depends on the perspective.

Oh yeah, who can forget that magical run in 1929 when the Packers won a 12 team league in which some teams played as few as 6 games whiles others played 18. That totally counts as something worth doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, ChazStandard said:

Oh yeah, who can forget that magical run in 1929 when the Packers won a 12 team league in which some teams played as few as 6 games whiles others played 18. That totally counts as something worth doing.

Again, depends on the perspective. If you want to make the cutoff point the 1960's they still have 7 titles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HorizontoZenith said:

Yessssss, let's get more discussion on the Patriots getting ring #6.  Somebody make a thread about how unstoppable the Patriots are at home in the playoffs, too.  Let the overconfidence flow through you. 

When the jinxing is so blatant it doesn't work. It has to be something stupid like everyone predicting the Patriots will go 16-0 and rout KC in the opener. I could see that loss coming a mile away. I think everybody knows all the teams that are left could put together some type of game to give NE trouble and potentially win, even if that isn't the outcome that will likely be favored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 1ForTheThumb said:

A SB victory this year would mean they went back to back TWICE and 3/4 TWICE.

I don't know how even the world's biggest Patriot hater could have an argument at that point.

would that officially be two dynasties or one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Asciimo said:

would that officially be two dynasties or one

Some people are picky and want to say it's two, but really this whole thing has always been considered one long dynasty since 2001. It's always been treated that way. From 2001 to today the Patriots have never went more than 3 years without appearing in a Super Bowl. Tom Brady specifically has never played more than two full seasons without making a Super Bowl in his career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

would still have the pats behind the steelers for greatest of the SB era.. both behind GB for overall

the pats peak is higher then their peaks but those franchises still have more success(more wins, playoff wins, higher win%, hall of famers, div titles etc..)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, August4th said:

would still have the pats behind the steelers for greatest of the SB era.. both behind GB for overall

the pats peak is higher then their peaks but those franchises still have more success(more wins, playoff wins, higher win%, hall of famers, div titles etc..)

Yeah but the Pats would have went through the Steelers in 3 of their 6 if they did match them. Something to think about. Just messing with yo.

Patriots also have a better win percentage than the Steelers and are just slightly under the Packers. More so the Packers winning stats are kind of inflated for existing 40 years before the Patriots and the Steelers existed 20 years before the Patriots. You really can't compare the Packers number of wins to an AFL team. And yeah the Steelers did win in the 70's, but they started in the 1933 and only had one playoff appearance in their first 40 years of existence. The Patriots didn't start out hot either, but they didn't have that 40 year lag either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, lancerman said:

Yeah but the Pats would have went through the Steelers in 3 of their 6 if they did match them. Something to think about. Just messing with yo.

Patriots also have a better win percentage than the Steelers and are just slightly under the Packers. More so the Packers winning stats are kind of inflated for existing 40 years before the Patriots and the Steelers existed 20 years before the Patriots. You really can't compare the Packers number of wins to an AFL team. And yeah the Steelers did win in the 70's, but they started in the 1933 and only had one playoff appearance in their first 40 years of existence. The Patriots didn't start out hot either, but they didn't have that 40 year lag either.

bring up good points .. bulk vs efficiency

still like the steelers since the merger but NE is right behind them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, PapaShogun said:

Packers I think have 12 titles. If you're talking Super Bowl era, maybe. Greatest dynasty is different from greatest franchise. Patriots were around for years and years before 2001, and didn't have a single title. Depends on the perspective.

Only in football do folks dismiss anything that happened before the SB era for some reason.  But every era has their dynasty is seems.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...