Jump to content

Duck's Mock Draft 6.0


Da_Ducktator

Recommended Posts

Never thought I would have to write these words in my lifetime, but the Eagles are Super Bowl Champions... Last Pre-Combine Mock now that the order is finalized.

  1. Cleveland Browns - QB Baker Mayfield, Oklahoma
  2. New York Giants - QB Josh Rosen, UCLA
  3. Indianapolis Colts - RB Saquon Barkley, Penn State
  4. Cleveland Browns (from Houston) - S Minkah Fitzpatrick, Alabama
  5. Denver Broncos - OG Quenton Nelson, Notre Dame
  6. New York Jets - QB Sam Darnold, USC
  7. Tampa Bay Buccaneers - EDGE Bradley Chubb, North Carolina State
  8. Chicago Bears - LB Tremaine Edmunds, Virginia Tech
  9. Oakland Raiders - DT Vita Vea, Washington
  10. San Francisco 49ers - CB Josh Jackson, Iowa
  11. Miami Dolphins - QB Josh Allen, Wyoming
  12. Cincinnati Bengals - OT Connor Williams, Texas
  13. Washington Redskins - CB Denzel Ward, Ohio State
  14. Green Bay Packers - LB Rashaan Evans, Alabama
  15. Arizona Cardinals - OT Brian O'Neill, Pittsburgh
  16. Baltimore Ravens - DT Da'Ron Payne, Alabama
  17. Los Angeles Chargers - OT Orlando Brown, Oklahoma
  18. Seattle Seahawks - SS/LB Derwin James, Florida State
  19. Dallas Cowboys - DT Taven Bryan, Florida
  20. Detroit Lions - EDGE Marcus Davenport, UTSA
  21. Buffalo Bills - LB Roquan Smith, Georgia
  22. Buffalo Bills (from Kansas City) - C/OG Frank Ragnow, Arkansas
  23. Los Angeles Rams - EDGE Arden Key, LSU
  24. Carolina Panthers - WR Calvin Ridley, Alabama
  25. Tennessee Titans - EDGE Sam Hubbard, Ohio State
  26. Atlanta Falcons - CB Jaire Alexander, Louisville
  27. New Orleans Saints - QB Lamar Jackson, Louisville
  28. Pittsburgh Steelers - LB Leighton Vander Esch, Boise State
  29. Jacksonville Jaguars - TE Mark Andrews, Oklahoma
  30. Minnesota Vikings - OG Will Hernandez, UTEP
  31. New England Patriots - RB Derrius Guice, LSU
  32. Philadelphia Eagles - OT Mike McGlinchey, Notre Dame
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pigsooie5 said:

Love Edmunds to Chicago. He seems like a very Ryan esq player that would excel in Vic Fangios scheme next to LBers like Leonard Floyd and Danny Trevathan.

Wanted to change things up slightly and after the Bears might want to invest in such a young LB with major potential for the defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Da_Ducktator said:

Green Bay Packers - LB Rashaan Evans, Alabama

Packers have had MULTIPLE offers to draft a off-ball LB early and every single time they've passed.  I don't sense there's going to be any changes even with the new FO.  They're going to likely draft either an EDGE (Marcus Davenport or Arden Key) or a CB if the EDGE value isn't there.  Outside chance they grab a safety, if they want to move Josh Jones to LB permanently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CWood21 said:

Packers have had MULTIPLE offers to draft a off-ball LB early and every single time they've passed.  I don't sense there's going to be any changes even with the new FO.  They're going to likely draft either an EDGE (Marcus Davenport or Arden Key) or a CB if the EDGE value isn't there.  Outside chance they grab a safety, if they want to move Josh Jones to LB permanently.

Evans offers a lot of versatility at the position though, similar to Clay Matthews in his prime. Evans was an EDGE guy early at Bama who they turned into an inside backer that still has great pass rushing prowess, specifically for an ILB. He has the kind of versatility the Pack have seemed to covet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mastercheddaar said:

As a Browns fan see Cleveland take Mayfield #1 overall hurts my heart. Then Fitz at #4... :( Way to get the FO and coaching staff fired in 2 years. 

That is all

mastercheddaar

You all cried when I said they would take Allen for his tools and Jackson for his ability to create turnovers at corner last week. Now, when I put the best-producing QB and arguably the best secondary prospect in the draft, still unhappy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jackson makes a lot of sense for the 49ers. I'm a little torn between he and ward.  I think Ward is the better cover corner, but Jackson has the size and probably fits the scheme better. I feel like I'm missing something with Jackson. I know a lot of people love him, but I just haven't fallen for him yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Da_Ducktator said:

You all cried when I said they would take Allen for his tools and Jackson for his ability to create turnovers at corner last week. Now, when I put the best-producing QB and arguably the best secondary prospect in the draft, still unhappy.

Take Darnold at #1 and Barkley at #4. The vast majority of us will say it's great. 

That is all

Mastercheddaar

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mastercheddaar said:

Take Darnold at #1 and Barkley at #4. The vast majority of us will say it's great. 

That is all

Mastercheddaar

Barkley isn't falling to four if the Colts stay put. Jim Irsay is way too much of a 'splash' kind of guy to take Bradley Chubb over Saquon Barkley, IMO. So, while it remains possible if the Colts trade out, I feel strongly Barkley will not last past the Colts if they stay at 3.

I obviously feel like Darnold will go high and I personally like him the most of the bunch, but it just seems doubtful he is the top QB off the board. His funky mechanics are going to discourage NFL teams when they have options like Matt Ryan 2.0 (Rosen), a guy with every tool on the planet (Allen), and then a diminutive but uber productive with good arm talent gunslinger (Mayfield).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Forge said:

Jackson makes a lot of sense for the 49ers. I'm a little torn between he and ward.  I think Ward is the better cover corner, but Jackson has the size and probably fits the scheme better. I feel like I'm missing something with Jackson. I know a lot of people love him, but I just haven't fallen for him yet. 

I second this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...