cconocool Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 It seems like we frequently lose coordinators. I think teams should. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swede700 Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 No. If I were to get hired by another company at a higher level, does my old employer deserve to get a reward from my new employer? That's pure nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikesfan89 Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 Isn't shurmur the first one that we've lost under Zimmer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VikeManDan Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 45 minutes ago, vikesfan89 said: Isn't shurmur the first one that we've lost under Zimmer? I believe so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VikeManDan Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 1 hour ago, cconocool said: It seems like we frequently lose coordinators. I think teams should. Curious as to how and what they would be compensated with, draft picks? I have to say no on this one as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swede700 Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 2 minutes ago, VikeManDan said: I believe so. And I'm not sure that they had lost anyone else since Tomlin... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gopherwrestler Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 31 minutes ago, disaacs said: And I'm not sure that they had lost anyone else since Tomlin... Well we haven’t been exactly any good since then either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vikes_Bolts1228 Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 Nah. But I 100% think that no coaches should be interviewed until that team is done playing for the season whether it's post week 17 or playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingsrule Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 1 hour ago, Vikes_Bolts1228 said: Nah. But I 100% think that no coaches should be interviewed until that team is done playing for the season whether it's post week 17 or playoffs. I agree. interviewing for a job during the playoffs just isn't right. But I'd prefer for all teams to not be able to make hiring decisions/formal interviews until after the playoffs unless a candidate is a free agent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VikeManDan Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Could not agree more with the last 2 posts! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vikes_Bolts1228 Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 14 minutes ago, vikingsrule said: I agree. interviewing for a job during the playoffs just isn't right. But I'd prefer for all teams to not be able to make hiring decisions/formal interviews until after the playoffs unless a candidate is a free agent. Completely agree. You can't talk to pending free agent players before a certain date and it should be the same for coaches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swede700 Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 13 hours ago, vikingsrule said: I agree. interviewing for a job during the playoffs just isn't right. But I'd prefer for all teams to not be able to make hiring decisions/formal interviews until after the playoffs unless a candidate is a free agent. That's the only thing that'd be acceptable. I don't think you can have a situation where coaches on non-playoff teams can all interview, but those in the playoffs can't interview at all. Personally, I think the format right now is fine, but I think teams should have the ability to contingency hire those playoff coaches, because then they can settle down mentally, knowing full well what they are going to be doing after the season, not fretting about whether they are going to get the job or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cconocool Posted February 15, 2018 Author Share Posted February 15, 2018 Well, Gruden got traded for picks. But something like free agency compensation. 6th rounders. The team getting the coach wouldn't need to give up anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RpMc Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 Again, why? What’s the reasoning behind the thinking that teams need to be compensated for losing a coordinator. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swede700 Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 21 minutes ago, cconocool said: Well, Gruden got traded for picks. But something like free agency compensation. 6th rounders. The team getting the coach wouldn't need to give up anything. Gruden was a head coach and wasn't a free agent. He was still under contract and making a lateral move. That's far different that a coordinator leaving for a promotion, which Shurmur did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.