Whicker Posted March 31, 2018 Share Posted March 31, 2018 1 hour ago, Jlash said: You need WR's and he's a good one. And if I miss out on Ridley in the first that means I don't get to fill my need? This is an extremely deep WR class. Ridley has warts all over his profile. He tested poorly at the combine and is smaller than people originally suggested. He has a BMI of 25.3. The only first round WRs with a lower BMI were Ted Ginn and Will Fuller and they were blazing fast and haven't even been that great. Only two other first round WRs have had a BMI below 26: Anthony Gonzalez and AJ Jenkins. His production in college was terrible. Other first round WRs with similar college production include Darrius Heyward-bey, Laquon Treadwell, Anthony Gonzalez, Cordarrelle Patterson, Craig Davis, Mike Williams, Jon Baldwin, and Kelvin Benjamin. Combine this with the fact that Ridley is really old for a rookie and you have one of my least favorite WR prospects in this draft. If you are so intent on mocking me offensive help at 1.14 then just make it Guice or Moore 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pheltzbahr Posted March 31, 2018 Share Posted March 31, 2018 So what you're saying is rags is going to draft him? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted March 31, 2018 Share Posted March 31, 2018 4 minutes ago, pheltzbahr said: So what you're saying is rags is going to draft him? No, I don't like him very much either. Which means he will be an All-Pro. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MD4L Posted March 31, 2018 Share Posted March 31, 2018 1 minute ago, Ragnarok said: No, I don't like him very much either. Which means he will be an All-Pro. Ridley is pretty under appreciated this year. I think it'll be a legit surprise if he's not a productive receiver. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted March 31, 2018 Share Posted March 31, 2018 1 hour ago, MD4L said: Ridley is pretty under appreciated this year. I think it'll be a legit surprise if he's not a productive receiver. He's underappreciated as a top 20 prospect? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Slim Posted March 31, 2018 Share Posted March 31, 2018 if any of y'all need a co owner hmu @Shady Slim 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DingoLadd Posted March 31, 2018 Share Posted March 31, 2018 8 hours ago, TedLavie said: 1.6 - Sydney - Vita Vea, NT With Ward already selected, Sydney is in a tough position here. I think they reach a tad for Vea, who would look awesome in the middle of Malik Jackson and Leonard Williams I'm not against Vea in the middle of my defense but I'm a bit against drafting a d-line after last year's disaster with McDowell... RIP his career. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DingoLadd Posted April 1, 2018 Share Posted April 1, 2018 Might as well make it official, The Sydney Dingos welcome @Shady Slim as our new co-owner. 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WFLukic Posted April 1, 2018 Share Posted April 1, 2018 Louisiana Jazz Trade Block: WR - Quincy Enunwa Edge - Cameron Wake Edge - Alvin Dupree Edge - Cam Wake INT - Jurrell Casey S - Eric Weddle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted April 1, 2018 Share Posted April 1, 2018 My gf just told me that she hates the song Hotel California. I'm not sure how to react to this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WFLukic Posted April 1, 2018 Share Posted April 1, 2018 Don't 5th year options IRL always have to be at the full value? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted April 1, 2018 Share Posted April 1, 2018 OKC's updated trade block: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted April 1, 2018 Share Posted April 1, 2018 And no, that previous post has no mistakes. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirA1 Posted April 1, 2018 Share Posted April 1, 2018 (edited) 32 minutes ago, WFLukic said: Don't 5th year options IRL always have to be at the full value? Just reread that and it is only 100% if you don't want to use a 3 Up. Now this won't get you the option to align a RL contract if one is signed at 85% like if a player is Franchised. I would say you could do the 100% 5th year and also designate the player a 3 Up if you wanted it to align with the RL deal but that is likely something for an owners meeting to confirm. Edited April 1, 2018 by SirA1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirA1 Posted April 1, 2018 Share Posted April 1, 2018 31 minutes ago, Whicker said: And no, that previous post has no mistakes. I already cleaned you out of the player I wanted. ') Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts