Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Deekster37

Let's get a QB!!!

Recommended Posts

I think it's a no brainer to grab a QB at 11! T-hill is not the answer and Cutler no thanks although I would take Cutler over T-Hill! Let me know your thoughts thanks!

Edited by Deekster37

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would take a QB should Rosen, Darnold or Mayfield be available no one else at 11. I would even trade up for one but no way would I have Cutler over Tannehill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, mountainpd said:

I would take a QB should Rosen, Darnold or Mayfield be available no one else at 11. I would even trade up for one but no way would I have Cutler over Tannehill.

What he said!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am thinking Landry gets traded to the 49ers or Giants to move up in the first round to get the QB they want for the future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/24/2018 at 3:38 PM, Deekster37 said:

T-hill is not the answer and Cutler no thanks although I would take Cutler over T-Hill!

I don't get some fans.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, cddolphin said:

I don't get some fans.

Yeah, that statement just doesn't make any sense.  I'm not a huge Tannehill fan, but he's better than many starting QBs in the league.  (Yes, he's also worse than many starting QBs).  Even if a QB is drafted in the 1st, you have to believe they will be sitting and learning behind Tannehill for a year.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cutler 2017 Stats: 14 games, 62% completion, 2,666 yards, 6.21 Y/A, 19 TD, 14 Int, 80.8 Rating

T-Hill 2016 Stats: 13 games, 67.1% Completion, 2,995 yards, 7.7 Y/A, 19 TD, 12 Int, 93.5 Rating

Neither have mind-blowing stats but Tannehill is better. 

Fun fact (or not so fun depending on how you look at it) - Culter was pick #11 by the Broncos in 2006

I still believe in Tannehill, for better or for worse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Silver_Lining said:

 

T-Hill 2016 Stats: 13 games, 67.1% Completion, 2,995 yards, 7.7 Y/A, 19 TD, 12 Int, 93.5 Rating

 

I think there were only 4 starting QBs in the NFL that year who had both a higher % and Y/A than Tannehill. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, freak_of_nature said:

I think there were only 4 starting QBs in the NFL that year who had both a higher % and Y/A than Tannehill. 

He also had 13 TDs - 5 INTs over his last 7 games before the injury.. almost as if it took around 6 games or so with a brand new HC and OC (again, Tannehill's 2nd HC and 4th OC) to feel comfortable in the system...

Demanding excellence right away and snubbing your nose at the type of play Tannehill has shown himself capable of under Gase is just an odd way to view things, especially after a year we saw the likes of Case Keenum, Blake Bortles, and Nick Foles make deep playoff runs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, hrubes20 said:

Yeah, that statement just doesn't make any sense.  I'm not a huge Tannehill fan, but he's better than many starting QBs in the league.  (Yes, he's also worse than many starting QBs).  Even if a QB is drafted in the 1st, you have to believe they will be sitting and learning behind Tannehill for a 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol! That adds to my original point to grab a QB at 11...... especially Allen .......if he is there?! We need that shot of  winning juice as an organization  and i think young blood brings that especially with "Gase can crack the case" at the helm!  I'm not the biggest fan of Cutler trust me I'm a season ticket holder for the packers!.........I've seen plenty of QB stuff......of Cutler! I'm  just sayin for one year to bridge to the next guy I would like Cutler......T-Hill keeps you trapped in that yeah maybee he has it this year guys........... oh ****  we ended 7-9 or better world! No thanks! Also I have a time share in Houston......I watched Watson change that city football wise! ....... imo that's what Miami needs! But im not trying to be rude just my opinion! That's why we're here right............you guys are  not far off

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, hrubes20 said:

Yeah, that statement just doesn't make any sense.  I'm not a huge Tannehill fan, but he's better than many starting QBs in the league.  (Yes, he's also worse than many starting QBs).  Even if a QB is drafted in the 1st, you have to believe they will be sitting and learning behind Tannehill for a 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you would take Cutler over Tannehill you clearly haven't watched any Dolphins games in the last three years.

I think if Rosen or Darnold drop, I could be on board. Not a huge fan of Mayfield, Allen, or Jackson. But even then, I'd rather roll with Tannehill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/26/2018 at 10:48 AM, hrubes20 said:

Yeah, that statement just doesn't make any sense.  I'm not a huge Tannehill fan, but he's better than many starting QBs in the league.  (Yes, he's also worse than many starting QBs).  Even if a QB is drafted in the 1st, you have to believe they will be sitting and learning behind Tannehill for a 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  



×