Deekster37 Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 I think it's a no brainer to grab a QB at 11! T-hill is not the answer and Cutler no thanks although I would take Cutler over T-Hill! Let me know your thoughts thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mountainpd Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 I would take a QB should Rosen, Darnold or Mayfield be available no one else at 11. I would even trade up for one but no way would I have Cutler over Tannehill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swampbilly Posted February 25, 2018 Share Posted February 25, 2018 21 hours ago, mountainpd said: I would take a QB should Rosen, Darnold or Mayfield be available no one else at 11. I would even trade up for one but no way would I have Cutler over Tannehill. What he said!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dolphinmeister Posted February 25, 2018 Share Posted February 25, 2018 I am thinking Landry gets traded to the 49ers or Giants to move up in the first round to get the QB they want for the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cddolphin Posted February 26, 2018 Share Posted February 26, 2018 On 2/24/2018 at 3:38 PM, Deekster37 said: T-hill is not the answer and Cutler no thanks although I would take Cutler over T-Hill! I don't get some fans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrubes20 Posted February 26, 2018 Share Posted February 26, 2018 1 hour ago, cddolphin said: I don't get some fans. Yeah, that statement just doesn't make any sense. I'm not a huge Tannehill fan, but he's better than many starting QBs in the league. (Yes, he's also worse than many starting QBs). Even if a QB is drafted in the 1st, you have to believe they will be sitting and learning behind Tannehill for a year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Lining Posted February 26, 2018 Share Posted February 26, 2018 Cutler 2017 Stats: 14 games, 62% completion, 2,666 yards, 6.21 Y/A, 19 TD, 14 Int, 80.8 Rating T-Hill 2016 Stats: 13 games, 67.1% Completion, 2,995 yards, 7.7 Y/A, 19 TD, 12 Int, 93.5 Rating Neither have mind-blowing stats but Tannehill is better. Fun fact (or not so fun depending on how you look at it) - Culter was pick #11 by the Broncos in 2006 I still believe in Tannehill, for better or for worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deekster37 Posted February 26, 2018 Author Share Posted February 26, 2018 That's sad! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tetsujin Posted February 26, 2018 Share Posted February 26, 2018 1 hour ago, Silver_Lining said: T-Hill 2016 Stats: 13 games, 67.1% Completion, 2,995 yards, 7.7 Y/A, 19 TD, 12 Int, 93.5 Rating I think there were only 4 starting QBs in the NFL that year who had both a higher % and Y/A than Tannehill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cddolphin Posted February 26, 2018 Share Posted February 26, 2018 1 hour ago, freak_of_nature said: I think there were only 4 starting QBs in the NFL that year who had both a higher % and Y/A than Tannehill. He also had 13 TDs - 5 INTs over his last 7 games before the injury.. almost as if it took around 6 games or so with a brand new HC and OC (again, Tannehill's 2nd HC and 4th OC) to feel comfortable in the system... Demanding excellence right away and snubbing your nose at the type of play Tannehill has shown himself capable of under Gase is just an odd way to view things, especially after a year we saw the likes of Case Keenum, Blake Bortles, and Nick Foles make deep playoff runs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deekster37 Posted February 27, 2018 Author Share Posted February 27, 2018 14 hours ago, hrubes20 said: Yeah, that statement just doesn't make any sense. I'm not a huge Tannehill fan, but he's better than many starting QBs in the league. (Yes, he's also worse than many starting QBs). Even if a QB is drafted in the 1st, you have to believe they will be sitting and learning behind Tannehill for a Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deekster37 Posted February 27, 2018 Author Share Posted February 27, 2018 Lol! That adds to my original point to grab a QB at 11...... especially Allen .......if he is there?! We need that shot of winning juice as an organization and i think young blood brings that especially with "Gase can crack the case" at the helm! I'm not the biggest fan of Cutler trust me I'm a season ticket holder for the packers!.........I've seen plenty of QB stuff......of Cutler! I'm just sayin for one year to bridge to the next guy I would like Cutler......T-Hill keeps you trapped in that yeah maybee he has it this year guys........... oh **** we ended 7-9 or better world! No thanks! Also I have a time share in Houston......I watched Watson change that city football wise! ....... imo that's what Miami needs! But im not trying to be rude just my opinion! That's why we're here right............you guys are not far off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deekster37 Posted February 27, 2018 Author Share Posted February 27, 2018 14 hours ago, hrubes20 said: Yeah, that statement just doesn't make any sense. I'm not a huge Tannehill fan, but he's better than many starting QBs in the league. (Yes, he's also worse than many starting QBs). Even if a QB is drafted in the 1st, you have to believe they will be sitting and learning behind Tannehill for a Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheKillerNacho Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 If you would take Cutler over Tannehill you clearly haven't watched any Dolphins games in the last three years. I think if Rosen or Darnold drop, I could be on board. Not a huge fan of Mayfield, Allen, or Jackson. But even then, I'd rather roll with Tannehill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deekster37 Posted February 27, 2018 Author Share Posted February 27, 2018 On 2/26/2018 at 10:48 AM, hrubes20 said: Yeah, that statement just doesn't make any sense. I'm not a huge Tannehill fan, but he's better than many starting QBs in the league. (Yes, he's also worse than many starting QBs). Even if a QB is drafted in the 1st, you have to believe they will be sitting and learning behind Tannehill for a Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.