GongKong Posted March 3, 2018 Share Posted March 3, 2018 The GB philosophy has had success. Come down to Hue and Haslam. Keeping Hue due to contract and $$ is the scary thing to me. I guess they have Haley who they think is HC material already signed up. We will see. I habe little to no hope of sensibility. But at least the guys we brought in have worked their system with success. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruceb Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 5 hours ago, GongKong said: But at least the guys we brought in have worked their system with success. But they didn't have to contend with Huebris/Hueball and Haslam. I can see Huebris/Hueball with his limited concept of O and inability to judge QB talent lobbying for Allen, Haslam because he is an idiot buying into Mayfield and the other guys pimping for Darnold or Rosen and losing the battle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aztec Hammer Posted March 4, 2018 Author Share Posted March 4, 2018 Dorsey listed his belief in the top 5 most important positions to win football games. Unless he is bluffing, which is an impression I didn't get, it's the following: 1. QB (obviously) 2. Pass rusher 3. Corner 4. Left Tackle 5. Wide receiver Denzel Ward in a small trade down from 4, that's my guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruceb Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 9 minutes ago, Aztec Hammer said: Denzel Ward in a small trade down from 4, that's my guess. Doesn't check the prototype box. And it seems Dorsey likes bigger CBs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LETSGOBROWNIES Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 1 hour ago, Aztec Hammer said: Dorsey listed his belief in the top 5 most important positions to win football games. Unless he is bluffing, which is an impression I didn't get, it's the following: 1. QB (obviously) 2. Pass rusher 3. Corner 4. Left Tackle 5. Wide receiver Denzel Ward in a small trade down from 4, that's my guess. Applying the principals to these positions, Chubb and Nelson (provided they think he can play LT) would be the leaders at 4 I’d imagine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aztec Hammer Posted March 4, 2018 Author Share Posted March 4, 2018 Just now, LETSGOBROWNIES said: Applying the principals to these positions, Chubb and Nelson (provided they think he can play LT) would be the leaders at 4 I’d imagine. I was thinking Chubb will be bypassed because we have Garrett, and then I was on the fence about Nelson because we have Thomas (and that he's a natural Guard). Wouldn't hate Chubb but we've spent a #1 and #32 on ends in the last two years, and they're super young and brimming with breakout potential. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwibrown Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 12 minutes ago, Aztec Hammer said: I was thinking Chubb will be bypassed because we have Garrett, and then I was on the fence about Nelson because we have Thomas (and that he's a natural Guard). Wouldn't hate Chubb but we've spent a #1 and #32 on ends in the last two years, and they're super young and brimming with breakout potential. We could play all 3 at once a lot of the time. That said we would be on the books at the same time for three stud de’s. we ain’t keeping them all. id rather invest outside of those positions. I lament that there isn’t a freakish we in the draft or even a top 5 guy. That said at the moment with 4 I either want Barkley or Nelson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.