PantherFan Posted March 11, 2018 Share Posted March 11, 2018 1. BROWNS: Saquon Barkley, RB, Penn St.2. GIANTS: Josh Rosen, QB, UCLA3. COLTS: Bradley Chubb, DE, N.C. State4. BROWNS (from HOU): Josh Allen, QB, Wyoming 5. BRONCOS: Sam Darnold, QB, USC6. JETS: Baker Mayfield, QB, Oklahoma7. BUCCANEERS: Denzel Ward, CB, Ohio St.8. BEARS: Quenton Nelson, G, Notre Dame 9. 49ERS: Marcus Davenport, DE/OLB, UT-San Antonio 10. RAIDERS: Minkah Fitzpatrick, S, Alabama11. DOLPHINS: Tremaine Edmunds, OLB, Va. Tech12. BENGALS: Roquan Smith, OLB, Georgia13. REDSKINS: Vita Vea, DT, Washington 14. PACKERS: Joshua Jackson, CB, Iowa15. CARDINALS: Calvin Ridley, WR, Alabama16. RAVENS: Courtland Sutton, WR, SMU17. CHARGERS: Da’Ron Payne, NT, Alabama18. SEAHAWKS: Derwin James, S, Florida St.19. COWBOYS: Taven Bryan, DT, Florida20. LIONS: Rashaan Evans, LB, Alabama 21. BILLS: James Daniels, C Iowa 22. BILLS (from CHIEFS): Maurice Hurst, Dt Michigan23. RAMS: Harold Landry, OLB/DE, Boston College24. PANTHERS: Mike McGlinchey, OT, Notre Dame25. TITANS: Will Hernandez, G, UTEP26. FALCONS: Isaiah Wynn, OT/G, Georgia27. SAINTS: Lamar Jackson, QB, Louisville 28. STEELERS: Ronnie Harrison, S , Alabama29. JAGUARS: Christian kirk, WR, Texas A & M30. VIKINGS: Jaire Alexander, CB, Louisville31. PATRIOTS: Connor Williams, OT, Texas32. EAGLES: Leighton Vander Esch, LB, Boise St. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ttitansfan4life Posted March 11, 2018 Share Posted March 11, 2018 Not against a OG but I’d prefer Leighton Vander Esch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrownsDog23 Posted March 11, 2018 Share Posted March 11, 2018 F- for the Browns. Taking a RB at 1 plus the worst QB in the draft = another 18 years of mediocrity. All while Darnold is still on the board Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NudeTayne Posted March 11, 2018 Share Posted March 11, 2018 Everyone needs to stop the whole Barkley at one thing. There is literally a 0% chance of it happening, and it just really undermines mocks and ruins them. What's the point of even doing a mock when the first pic is impossible? I asked that kind of bluntly because so many people are doing it. There is no possibility that this happens, so why do it? It's not risky or interesting. It just is a bad mock. Why not put Quenton Nelson number one? Why not put Minkah Fitzpatrick number one? The other elite positions are not going number one. I just don't get it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dawgdish Posted March 11, 2018 Share Posted March 11, 2018 As a Browns fan, first I'd be mad they took Barkley at #1 (I like him, but they should choose the QB they want there), then I'd be thrilled when at #4 Darold was still on the board, then I'd rage uncontrollably when they took Allen instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REBEL65 Posted March 11, 2018 Share Posted March 11, 2018 Agree that Barkley shouldn't go one but why is everyone so down on taking Mayfield #1 the kids a winner and checks off all the boxes other than being the perfect height. I think Cleveland could use a confident cocky QB. If Barkley is there at 4 you take him and there backfield set for years to come . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FalconFan13 Posted March 11, 2018 Share Posted March 11, 2018 With all the good DT's gone Wynn would be the best pick we could make in that situation so it's a solid mock. Also as far as Barkley 1 i would dang sure take him there and take whichever of the just QB's fall to 4. None of them are super impressive enough for me to draft one of them at #1 as a can't miss prospect like Luck was coming out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted March 11, 2018 Share Posted March 11, 2018 Could be worse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Car_Ramrod Posted March 11, 2018 Share Posted March 11, 2018 Would love Landry to the Rams. We definitely need a pass rusher and he would do very well in Wades defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danish49ers Posted March 11, 2018 Share Posted March 11, 2018 Would prefer Tremaine Edmunds at #9. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason_Bengal_Fl Posted March 11, 2018 Share Posted March 11, 2018 From what Teryl Austin has said I think Vea would be more likely than Smith. But I wouldn't complain with Smith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Housegoat Posted March 11, 2018 Share Posted March 11, 2018 As a Packer fan, I would pray for a trade back if this happens.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BleedTheClock Posted March 11, 2018 Share Posted March 11, 2018 2 hours ago, REBEL65 said: Agree that Barkley shouldn't go one but why is everyone so down on taking Mayfield #1 the kids a winner and checks off all the boxes other than being the perfect height. I think Cleveland could use a confident cocky QB. If Barkley is there at 4 you take him and there backfield set for years to come . I'm fine with Mayfield. But not at 1. If we have Mayfield as our top QB (possible), we should just take Barkley at 1 and be assured one of Darnold/Rosen/Mayfield. Mayfield is a virtual lock to make it to pick #4, which would be my reasoning behind selecting Saquon at 1. I still can't imagine the Browns not taking their top QB at #1. Barkley still has a great shot to be there at 4. I think the Colts are sold on Chubb and I think as long as Rosen isn't the #1 pick, he's headed to the Giants. Even if the Colts or Giants trade out of the 2/3 spots, it'll almost assuredly be for a QB, not a RB. I think the Browns first two picks are Darnold (1) and Barkley (4). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REBEL65 Posted March 11, 2018 Share Posted March 11, 2018 based on what Dorsey just did the past couple days though leads me to believe that Mayfield is the pick. The trade for Tyrod Taylor with him measuring in at 6'1 and Mayfield roughly the same size and ability Todd Healey wont have to alter his offense at all unlike drafting Darnold or Rosen. So if they want Barkley he should be there at 4 leaving trade ups at the Giants and Colts spots for the 2 QB's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bananabucket Posted March 11, 2018 Share Posted March 11, 2018 6 hours ago, NudeTayne said: There is literally a 0% chance of it happening, You don't know what literally means. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.