sp6488 Posted March 15, 2018 Share Posted March 15, 2018 1 hour ago, Crickett said: The Ryan Grant contract is so bad, it counts for both. Well, completely out of the clouds... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigMountainGoat Posted March 16, 2018 Share Posted March 16, 2018 Crabtree is better than Grant, but even if he signs I'd still consider Baltimore a loser, they had the chance to get an established long term WR1, Crabtree is short term sticking plaster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
43M Posted March 16, 2018 Share Posted March 16, 2018 1 hour ago, BigMountainGoat said: Crabtree is better than Grant, but even if he signs I'd still consider Baltimore a loser, they had the chance to get an established long term WR1, Crabtree is short term sticking plaster What established long term WR1 did they have a good chance at? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigMountainGoat Posted March 16, 2018 Share Posted March 16, 2018 23 minutes ago, FourThreeMafia said: What established long term WR1 did they have a good chance at? They could have bid strong at the likes of Watkins / Robinson. They are desperate, their WRs are so bad surely you just accept that you might have to be pay too much but finally get a WR1 for the first time in years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
43M Posted March 16, 2018 Share Posted March 16, 2018 1 hour ago, BigMountainGoat said: They could have bid strong at the likes of Watkins / Robinson. They are desperate, their WRs are so bad surely you just accept that you might have to be pay too much but finally get a WR1 for the first time in years I hear ya, but the fact is the Ravens werent going to be able to win a bidding war for either of those guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigMountainGoat Posted March 16, 2018 Share Posted March 16, 2018 26 minutes ago, FourThreeMafia said: I hear ya, but the fact is the Ravens werent going to be able to win a bidding war for either of those guys. Possibly, but they managed to put crazy money on the table for Grant, which if you add to the Brown money is about what Robinson got. I can see why he would choose the Bears over the Ravens anyway. But you just wonder if the Ravens could have been more bold in addressing such a major hole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nextsuperstar1 Posted March 16, 2018 Share Posted March 16, 2018 19 hours ago, Eagles23 said: Im well aware its worked out perfectly fine in the past. The offense should still be great with Gronk and Edelman around but the defensive side of the ball lacks more talent compared to other Pats teams I can remember. Belichick has gained two third round picks so far this offseason. You think he is giving those way to overpay for a mediocre free agent? He will bide his time and sign non-compensatory free agents (ie players cut by other teams). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
43M Posted March 16, 2018 Share Posted March 16, 2018 6 minutes ago, BigMountainGoat said: Possibly, but they managed to put crazy money on the table for Grant, which if you add to the Brown money is about what Robinson got. I can see why he would choose the Bears over the Ravens anyway. But you just wonder if the Ravens could have been more bold in addressing such a major hole. The money was only "crazy" because they overpaid for a JAG. Robinson is getting double what they gave Grant and they wouldve lost any bidding war they got into. They could have been more "bold", but bold isnt always smart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted March 16, 2018 Share Posted March 16, 2018 I love what the Bears are doing for M-Trib Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malik Posted March 16, 2018 Share Posted March 16, 2018 Colts are easily the biggest losers. They actually have a pretty decent size of cap space + a ton of wholes but have decided to do NOTHING all free agency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiefs82 Posted March 16, 2018 Share Posted March 16, 2018 They should've tried to keep Melvin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
valkrei Posted March 16, 2018 Share Posted March 16, 2018 3 hours ago, nextsuperstar1 said: Belichick has gained two third round picks so far this offseason. You think he is giving those way to overpay for a mediocre free agent? He will bide his time and sign non-compensatory free agents (ie players cut by other teams). Belicheck is good at letting players walk at the right time. This is why they are so competitive each year. Right now they are still a tough team but replacing Brady will be hard once they have to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted March 16, 2018 Share Posted March 16, 2018 I guess you can't lose if you don't participate...cant win either lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFlaccoSeagulls Posted March 16, 2018 Share Posted March 16, 2018 Seahawks are looking pretty bad right now in Free Agency. They've lost: Paul Richardson Jimmy Graham Luke Willson Richard Sherman Michael Bennett Sheldon Richardson Jeremy Lane Deshawn Shead All of those players are starters except Willson, who was their #2 TE. They've added: Bradley McDougald (re-signed with the team). UPDATE: They just added TE Ed Dickson lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wackywabbit Posted March 16, 2018 Share Posted March 16, 2018 The Vikings are the biggest winners. They upgraded at QB with an already great roster. No other moves or set of moves should be expected to have the same impact Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.