pollino14 Posted August 2, 2018 Share Posted August 2, 2018 On some podcast today , someone said Perry and Clay were Pettine’s best pair of pass rushers he’s ever had. I remember The Jets/ Browns not having the most talented pass rushers; but how significant is that since he historically has created good pass rush? Before anyone says it, yes they do need to stay healthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted August 2, 2018 Share Posted August 2, 2018 3 hours ago, pollino14 said: On some podcast today , someone said Perry and Clay were Pettine’s best pair of pass rushers he’s ever had. I remember The Jets/ Browns not having the most talented pass rushers; but how significant is that since he historically has created good pass rush? Before anyone says it, yes they do need to stay healthy. With special packages with really cool names. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted August 2, 2018 Author Share Posted August 2, 2018 10 minutes ago, Norm said: With special packages with really cool names. Super duper psycho Ultra Razzmatazz Nitro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted August 2, 2018 Share Posted August 2, 2018 Just now, squire12 said: Super duper psycho Ultra Razzmatazz Nitro Actually we should call them really soft sounding **** so the opponent doesn't take them seriously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreatZepp Posted August 2, 2018 Share Posted August 2, 2018 46 minutes ago, Norm said: Actually we should call them really soft sounding **** so the opponent doesn't take them seriously. ‘Super shattered glass’and ‘sir, may I have your permission to rush as to not offend you?’ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wgbeethree Posted August 3, 2018 Share Posted August 3, 2018 1 hour ago, Norm said: Actually we should call them really soft sounding **** so the opponent doesn't take them seriously. I've got a buddy in a death metal band. We used to bribe him with a shot of whiskey if he would throw decidedly non-metal phrases into his growls. Some of my favorites were "fuzzy bunny", "rainbow marshmallow", and "unicorn princess". Those would all fit in nicely here. FWIW, we also got him to do the Charleston during a breakdown for a pitcher beer. Good times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnar Danneskjold Posted August 4, 2018 Share Posted August 4, 2018 This is an article about Rodgers, but I am encouraged by the comments about the defense: https://www.packersnews.com/story/sports/nfl/packers/2018/08/03/aaron-rodgers-answering-challenge-mike-pettines-packers-defense/901389002/ Scheming to get a free rusher, making it difficult on protection packages, the secondary moving around and not being in static positions- all things we haven't seen in a while, and which will not only make the defense better, it will improve the offense that has to practice against it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted August 4, 2018 Share Posted August 4, 2018 On 7/20/2018 at 1:29 PM, AlexGreen#20 said: Yeah, cause run defense means **** I mean, a couple of years ago everyone was complaining about our run D and then the Packers go out and fix that and they become porous on the backend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebpackfan Posted August 4, 2018 Share Posted August 4, 2018 More fiber will help a porous backend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnar Danneskjold Posted August 5, 2018 Share Posted August 5, 2018 I was impressed with Montravius Adams and his quick takeoff last night. With Pettine's statement about the importance of inside pass rush, I have to wonder if he won't play a big role on passing downs this year. I also noticed that Pettine used Wilkerson on a zone drop on one play- makes me wonder if we will see less 2-4 nickel sets and more 3-3 or 4-2 sets. Seems like they will be able to change things up a lot to stress protection packages this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KManX89 Posted August 5, 2018 Share Posted August 5, 2018 On 8/4/2018 at 1:26 PM, Ragnar Danneskjold said: This is an article about Rodgers, but I am encouraged by the comments about the defense: https://www.packersnews.com/story/sports/nfl/packers/2018/08/03/aaron-rodgers-answering-challenge-mike-pettines-packers-defense/901389002/ Scheming to get a free rusher, making it difficult on protection packages, the secondary moving around and not being in static positions- all things we haven't seen in a while, and which will not only make the defense better, it will improve the offense that has to practice against it. So maybe, just maybe, it wasn't our personnel holding us back all this time. Capers has historically ran middling-at-best defenses after having a great first couple of years with every team he's been the DC, just sayin'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted August 5, 2018 Share Posted August 5, 2018 On 8/2/2018 at 7:10 PM, Norm said: Actually we should call them really soft sounding **** so the opponent doesn't take them seriously. Taking the Hayden Frye route eh? Let's try the milkmaid package followed by the dank hash and then on third down we'll run the Miller Lite 6 pack... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted August 5, 2018 Share Posted August 5, 2018 Wanted to run through and look at some Pettine alignments. Here are a set from the first 9 plays from the 2015 game against the Jets. https://imgur.com/8ZbFKMB https://imgur.com/LX903qb Here's a nickel alignment. There's a hanging safety on the strong side that can either step into the box or drop off into a deeper zone. You never really saw Capers run a look with 5 guys in the first level and 1 on the second level. The equivalent with this roster would be: Perry-Daniels-Clark-Wilkerson-Matthews and then Martinez by himself on the second level. Replacing an inside linebacker with 5-tech is something that's becoming more common. +++ https://imgur.com/ShlUHkp https://imgur.com/oG1wIGm Here's a base look. Pretty standard 3-4 set with one side overloaded. Pretty standard look. +++ https://imgur.com/JeRNCt4 https://imgur.com/gTJnLs3 Another 3-3 nickel look. This one shaded into a standard 4-2 look with the strong OLB replaced with a genuine BIG. +++ https://imgur.com/Jvi1u1Q https://imgur.com/ILbF13c Here's a pressure package look from Pettine. It's 3rd and 3 so they're not all the way sold out on it yet, but you can see the change in principles. The two A-gap rushers make it tough on the offensive line to figure out who's coming from where. You force either the back or the Center to have to block a rusher 1v1 which is the idea. +++ https://imgur.com/w3b8D0w https://imgur.com/cDbBODl There's another base look. This time with a FB instead of a second TE. +++ https://imgur.com/cFpScHR https://imgur.com/ZRJ62Ue Another pressure look, this time choosing to spread everyone out. You can run a bunch of stunts and twists out of this look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shanedorf Posted August 5, 2018 Share Posted August 5, 2018 11 minutes ago, AlexGreen#20 said: Here's a nickel alignment. The equivalent with this roster would be: Perry-Daniels-Clark-Wilkerson-Matthews and then Martinez by himself on the second level. Replacing an inside linebacker with 5-tech is something that's becoming more common. So no Jake Ryan in this nickel alignment even if he wasn't IR'd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted August 5, 2018 Share Posted August 5, 2018 2 minutes ago, Shanedorf said: So no Jake Ryan in this nickel alignment even if he wasn't IR'd Not every play. There are plenty of nickel looks they play with a 2nd ILB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.