Calvert28 Posted April 7, 2018 Share Posted April 7, 2018 Why anyone would vote NE is beyond me. They've had a formula tried and true that has made them the most successful dynasty ever. Why reach when they don't need too? If anything trade back with the Browns or Jets who you know are going to suck next year and get a top pick that way. Way too much to move up in any current draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtyDez Posted April 7, 2018 Share Posted April 7, 2018 I would trade Patrick Peterson and two 1sts for #2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch_connor Posted April 8, 2018 Share Posted April 8, 2018 1 hour ago, DirtyDez said: I would trade Patrick Peterson and two 1sts for #2. With the aim of drafting which QB? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shylo3716 Posted April 8, 2018 Author Share Posted April 8, 2018 2 minutes ago, mitch_connor said: With the aim of drafting which QB? It better be a Tom Brady clone! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtyDez Posted April 8, 2018 Share Posted April 8, 2018 2 hours ago, mitch_connor said: With the aim of drafting which QB? Darnold or Mayfield. It would make more sense if Mayfield drops to 4 because the Giants don’t need a corner. I could see Cleveland going for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted April 8, 2018 Share Posted April 8, 2018 Buffalo owns 12, 22, 53, 56, 65, and 96 in the first three rounds. New England has 23, 31, 43, 64, and 95. This isn't even a discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted April 8, 2018 Share Posted April 8, 2018 3 hours ago, CWood21 said: Buffalo owns 12, 22, 53, 56, 65, and 96 in the first three rounds. New England has 23, 31, 43, 64, and 95. This isn't even a discussion. This is true indeed. The only problem...and its a persistent and consistent one....is that BUF doesnt realize it has the better selections. They think NE does Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman(DH23) Posted April 8, 2018 Share Posted April 8, 2018 ive said before what Buffalo needs to do is trade up to #4 right now. Then on draft day if the qb they covet is sitting at #2 offer the Giants #4, the opportunity to take Barkley, Chubb, or Nelson 2 spots lower, and 1 of their seconds and maybe a sweetener pick. That to me is the best way to get #2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted April 8, 2018 Share Posted April 8, 2018 53 minutes ago, Superman(DH23) said: ive said before what Buffalo needs to do is trade up to #4 right now. Then on draft day if the qb they covet is sitting at #2 offer the Giants #4, the opportunity to take Barkley, Chubb, or Nelson 2 spots lower, and 1 of their seconds and maybe a sweetener pick. That to me is the best way to get #2. Probably cheaper to move up to 6, and probably more effective for what they want to do. I don't think New York has any strong desire to move out of the top 6, so they'd need to be blown away to move out of that range. IF Buffalo can strike a deal with Indianapolis, that makes it more palatable for the Giants to move back. They're going to have to slightly overpay the Colts to move up, maybe not quite at the level of the Jets did but it's going to cost a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
honkeytonk Posted April 12, 2018 Share Posted April 12, 2018 On 4/4/2018 at 3:10 PM, SDotNova said: Buffalo definitely can put the better offer out there. Especially if the Giants don't want to trade to far back. Not a QB in the draft worth all NYG would ask and I don't think Buf wants Barkley, but one never knows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.