PFM18 Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 Just now, 49erurtaza said: It's 3 years 7 million. I'd say that's a steal. Definitely. Just makes it even better. Really happy with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 8 minutes ago, 49erurtaza said: It's 3 years 7 million. I'd say that's a steal. Far better than the, what $3.3 M the Raiders had him at? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broncofan Posted April 5, 2018 Author Share Posted April 5, 2018 56 minutes ago, 49erurtaza said: It's 3 years 7 million. I'd say that's a steal. 54 minutes ago, PFM18 said: Definitely. Just makes it even better. Really happy with this. 53 minutes ago, RaidersAreOne said: Far better than the, what $3.3 M the Raiders had him at? King made 7.5M the last 2 yrs with the accelerated cap hit for OAK. So hard to argue the value. And FWIW its a max value of 7M. So it could even be less than that. Really hard to argue with the deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 Perfect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
big_palooka Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 lol... revenge from a punter. If your punter is getting revenge, it means your offense sucks and you're having to punt a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
big_palooka Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 4 minutes ago, RaidersAreOne said: Perfect. It will get old quick when he's getting 15 yard penalties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
broncos67 Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 3 minutes ago, big_palooka said: lol... revenge from a punter. If your punter is getting revenge, it means your offense sucks and you're having to punt a lot. Could also mean he's pinning back teams and letting the defense have some better position to work with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
big_palooka Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 7 minutes ago, broncos67 said: Could also mean he's pinning back teams and letting the defense have some better position to work with. On occasion. Then he'll either muff one short, or get a 15 yard penalty celebrating a roughing the kicker penalty. Or Bronco fans should know.... throwing a ball at an opposing player. He's a great punter, but his try hard to be funny stuff will wear on you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ACO Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 I figured he would go to a rival after the way they cut him. Solid player. Team friendly deal. Good signing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bzane Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 4 hours ago, BABPITT said: https://goo.gl/images/8daXnP I always knew he was a jackass and this signing just confirms it lol Well, to be fair, Marquette seems to be toning it down already: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 Not to completely highjack the thread, but this seems to be where all the King talk will be. I like this move because those two prospects are freaking incredible. Cutting King and drafting one of those two means we get younger, cheaper and a lot less distracting while likely getting a similar product. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broncofan Posted April 5, 2018 Author Share Posted April 5, 2018 1 hour ago, big_palooka said: On occasion. Then he'll either muff one short, or get a 15 yard penalty celebrating a roughing the kicker penalty. Or Bronco fans should know.... throwing a ball at an opposing player. He's a great punter, but his try hard to be funny stuff will wear on you. It depends - if it's all off the field, the DEN locker room won't really care. If it's on the field...well, different story. We'll see. Thing is, the cost factors in - at 3.3M per year, he's one of the most expensive punters around. At 2.3M AAV, he's now just reaching top-10, and that's the MAX deal. If he's not performing on the field, then he won't cost us even that much. For DEN, the risk-benefit equation is really tilted in our favor more than him staying in OAK. 16 minutes ago, RaidersAreOne said: Not to completely highjack the thread, but this seems to be where all the King talk will be. I like this move because those two prospects are freaking incredible. Cutting King and drafting one of those two means we get younger, cheaper and a lot less distracting while likely getting a similar product. That's probably the one angle that justifies letting King go for OAK. All kidding aside about Gruden's penchant for old vets past their prime (although it's hard to resist lol), this is the one justifiable reason to have let King go in the offseason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HTTRDynasty Posted April 6, 2018 Share Posted April 6, 2018 So, over/under on the next Raiders punter being drafted in Round 4? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted April 6, 2018 Share Posted April 6, 2018 2 hours ago, HTTRG3Dynasty said: So, over/under on the next Raiders punter being drafted in Round 4? I'll say the 5th to ensure we get the top guy on our list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted April 6, 2018 Share Posted April 6, 2018 18 hours ago, game3525 said: Smart move. He is going to be lethal in Denver's altitude. True and unless they sure up the QB spot they will be using him alot. But given their weapons even an average QB should get the job done moving the ball Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.