Cheesehawk Posted April 11, 2018 Share Posted April 11, 2018 45 minutes ago, Mastercheddaar said: For Cleveland - Everything passed #1 is not good. Fitz over Chubb or Ward? 2 O-linemen in the 2nd and a turd sammich Keys?!?!? Take Chubb, Address CB, WR and RB in the 2nd. I don't want any O-line that are not named McGlinchey or Williams in the first 2 rounds. If someone is available in the 4th then so be it. That is all mastercheddaar LOL. I was gonna say, it would be such a Cleveland thing to take Key in the 2nd round. Dude is gonna bust so hard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgers0821 Posted April 11, 2018 Share Posted April 11, 2018 For the Packers I'd prefer an OL with the second 2nd round selection. Also, I don't believe Chark is worth that pick. Also, I'm hoping if the Packers trade the 14th pick it is to move up to snag a difference maker. Unfortunately Davenport is too much of a project for this team...we don't have 3 years to wait for him to make an impact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mlucas12002 Posted April 11, 2018 Share Posted April 11, 2018 35. Cleveland Browns (from HOU) – Will Hernandez OG UTEP Definitely not a position of need. Change to either Ronald Jones or whoever your highest-rated DT is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jebrick Posted April 11, 2018 Share Posted April 11, 2018 Quote 60. Pittsburgh Steelers – Chukwuma Okorafor OT Western Michigan zero need for a OT especially in the 2nd. Bates would be the perfect pick there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lions0-16 Posted April 11, 2018 Share Posted April 11, 2018 Looks solid for the Lions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Plissken Posted April 11, 2018 Share Posted April 11, 2018 Great trade back for Minnesota with Offensive Lineman still on the board....... but then reaching for a CB makes no sense. The team's biggest need is OL and their strength is defense, yet they take two defensive players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tttmikeb Posted April 13, 2018 Share Posted April 13, 2018 I like what you did with the Packers. I doubt they're looking to trade down in the first, but the deal you've got them making with SD makes sense, especially with them ending up with Davenport. I like the idea of trading up in the second too, especially for CB help. My only caveat would be it would make more sense for them to give DEN a pick this year. The Packers have 12 picks in this draft already, and would have at least 13 after your trade for them with DEN. Using a 4th or 5th this year in that second round trade would make more sense. Nice job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparroww77 Posted April 13, 2018 Share Posted April 13, 2018 On 4/11/2018 at 12:01 PM, Mastercheddaar said: For Cleveland - Everything passed #1 is not good. Fitz over Chubb or Ward? 2 O-linemen in the 2nd and a turd sammich Keys?!?!? Take Chubb, Address CB, WR and RB in the 2nd. I don't want any O-line that are not named McGlinchey or Williams in the first 2 rounds. If someone is available in the 4th then so be it. That is all mastercheddaar Dito Chubb at #4 We do have a need at LT only but not wow by any one in this class so Williams is alright i guess but then either Jaire Alexander, Isaiah Oliver at 33 or 35 then we get a RB at 64. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atown703 Posted April 14, 2018 Share Posted April 14, 2018 Hubbard over a WR in the 1st. Solid 2nd rounder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The OUTLAW Posted April 14, 2018 Share Posted April 14, 2018 Chubb is a much better pick for the Browns at 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.