Jump to content

Old Devils Thread (Lock 'er up please)


beekay414

Recommended Posts

Just now, Canadian Saint said:

I'll eat my hat if Edvinsson isn't taken in the top 10.

He really shouldn't be but, on HF, I added a caveat that I didn't add here. I had mentioned that I could see him going to San Jose or Detroit there over McTavish and Johnson. Same thing for Lysell.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, beekay414 said:

He really shouldn't be but, on HF, I added a caveat that I didn't add here. I had mentioned that I could see him going to San Jose or Detroit there over McTavish and Johnson. Same thing for Lysell.

I agree. I'm not the biggest fan of prospects like him. Did not like picking Broberg either. Guys who are more tools than skills don't really ever put it together imo.

Would not surprise me if Lysell or Sillinger challenge for the top 10 either.

Pinelli and Rosen are guys I hope the Oilers look at in the 20s but I wouldn't be surprised to see them have helium leading up the draft.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Updated after tonight...

Ordered by PTS%
1. Sabres (37 PTS) - 2 G (PIT x2)
2. Ducks (41 PTS) - 2 G (MIN x2)
3. Kraken
4. Devils (43 PTS) - 3 G (NYI x2, PHI)
5. Red Wings (45 PTS) - 2 G (CBJ x2)
6. Jackets (46 PTS) - 2 G (DET x2)
7. Canucks (41 PTS) - 9 G (EDM x3, WPG x2, CGY x4)
8. Sens (47 PTS) - 3 G (WPG, CGY, TML)
9. Sharks (48 PTS) - 3 G (ARI x2, VGK)
10. Flames (47 PTS) - 5 G (OTT, VAN x4)
11. Kings (48 PTS) - 5 G (COL x4, STL)

Team (PTS) - Wins (Games Remaining)
Ordered by PTS%
Sabres (37) - 11 (2)
Ducks (41) - 11 (2)
Devils (43) - 14 (3)
Wings (45) - 15 (2)
Jackets (46) - 12 (2)
Canucks (41) - 11 (9)
Sens (47) - 17 (3)
Sharks (48) - 15 (3)
Flames (47) - 19 (5)
Kings (48) - 19 (5)

Team (PTS) - ROW (Games Remaining)
Ordered by PTS%
Sabres (37) - 11 (2)
Ducks (41) - 15 (2)
Devils (43) - 18 (3)
Wings (45) - 16 (2)
Jackets (46) - 14 (2)
Canucks (41) - 16 (9)
Sens (47) - 19 (3)
Sharks (48) - 16 (3)
Flames (47) - 21 (5)
Kings (48) - 20 (5)

Kings actually fell behind the Yotes but they don't count so....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, beekay414 said:

Hey @Forge

Just gotta do this here but...

How's it feel to know you gave up substantially more for your version of Jordan Love than we did? 😉

I'll worry about it if Lance can't make an active roster at all this season and let you know. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Forge said:

I'll worry about it if Lance can't make an active roster at all this season and let you know. 

Considering you don't have an all-pro MVP just laying around, I'll take that as a "yeah, I know."

Love > Lance

Bet your *** on it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, beekay414 said:

Considering you don't have an all-pro MVP just laying around, I'll take that as a "yeah, I know."

Love > Lance

Bet your *** on it

I guess you'll find out soon enough given the Packers screwed the pooch with Rodgers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, beekay414 said:

Well, least we got 1. More than the Niners can say the last...well...25 years. 😉 

I forgot they you got that one tbh. Every time the Packers play the niners in the playoffs with rodgers it's just more like a bye week for SF. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...