Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Not surprising given what I have been hearing about Price. Packers usually only carry 5-6 d-linemen anyways. Daniels, Clark, Lowry and RJF are obvious as is Adams even if he misses 1-2 games to start the season. Price has been playing well from what I am hearing so he's No. 6 right there.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, packfanfb said:

Not surprising given what I have been hearing about Price. Packers usually only carry 5-6 d-linemen anyways. Daniels, Clark, Lowry and RJF are obvious as is Adams even if he misses 1-2 games to start the season. Price has been playing well from what I am hearing so he's No. 6 right there.

I guess the part I'm confused is that they can leave him on the SUSP list, and not have him count towards their active roster.  I'd have to imagine there will some amount of attrition after his 4 game suspension is up.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, CWood21 said:

I guess the part I'm confused is that they can leave him on the SUSP list, and not have him count towards their active roster.  I'd have to imagine there will some amount of attrition after his 4 game suspension is up.

Probably cut him early to give him a chance to latch onto another team.

Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, CWood21 said:

I guess the part I'm confused is that they can leave him on the SUSP list, and not have him count towards their active roster.  I'd have to imagine there will some amount of attrition after his 4 game suspension is up.

Was going to edit my post to add this b/c yea, it would make sense to hold onto him to see if those other guys survive 4 games or even the preseason. The timing of the release is odd. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, packfanfb said:

Was going to edit my post to add this b/c yea, it would make sense to hold onto him to see if those other guys survive 4 games or even the preseason. The timing of the release is odd. 

It's why I said Raji is coming back.  I'm not serious, but it's just like last year where we made a weird cut at a weird time (not Sitton) that left us at 89/90 and everybody speculated on why only for us to sign somebody nobody had ever heard of from some Amish college. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite surprised by this, the timing of it at least.  Guion with the suspension was a nice insurance for the DL group if they needed another body after the 4 game suspension was up.  

Just not how TT generally does things like this though.  If TT sees the younger players improving and the vet is not in the long term plans, he will generally not string them along, but rather give them a shot to catch on with another team.   TT being a player in the NFL, likely really values that opportunity that the player has in that situation.  Likely the players appreciate the honesty and opportunity to land with another team.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...