bkokot Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 This pick makes a bit more sense to me, it sounds like he needs better coaching in terms of technique, but he has the size to be a successful 5T. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GBHalas Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 Really like this pick. Needed another big bodied rotational player. Probably could spell both Hicks and Goldman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman(DH23) Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 5 tech depth is always a good thing. If we can get Hicks & Goldman's snaps reduced by 10% thats going to help protect 4th qtr leads Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAF-N72EX Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 Nothing wrong with taking a flier on a situational lineman late in the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madmike90 Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 Mayock seems to really like this guy...in terms of H/W/S he is prototype for the position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G08 Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 5T depth I would imagine, nice hedge to Bullard and RRH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronMike84 Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 Didn’t Unrein leave? This pick replaces him then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TB 1 Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 13 minutes ago, IronMike84 said: Didn’t Unrein leave? This pick replaces him then. Yes he did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZBearsFan Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 Like this one - showed out well at the Shrine Game against better competition and probably fits the rotation early on. A bit late here but the Iggy pick is one I didn’t understand a great deal on its face. Assuming they see him as an ILB (Pace will discuss later) then it’s more of an indictment on Kwiatkowski than I would have expected, and if he’s a smaller situational edge guy then I think there were better guys available to fill that same role. At his size they could project him as a SS too. TBD. Just caught off guard by that one. Easily the worst pick of the draft for us on it’s face value. Fully expect he fills the ST void left by Christian Jones’ departure though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman(DH23) Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 1 hour ago, Profound23 said: When I grade it is based on what my opinion, not pundits. I watched a lot of both. Bears have spent the last two years giving away too many picks. If Tribusky and Miller work out then it’s worth it, if not they’re setting themselves back even more. I thought if they wanted a wideout they should’ve went Sutton over Daniels. They also passed on Landry, Gesicki, and Josh Jackson who I think will be better than Daniels. When they traded up I thought maybe Washington or DJ Chark at wideout or DB Oliver/Donte Jackson. I thought they did a great job in the first round, after that not so much. You feel differently and could be right. We will find out in a year or two. I think Roquan Smith, Josh Jackson, and James Washington would’ve been the better picks. However, either way I would not have traded a future second. If they go 3-13 or 4-12 (could easily happen in that division) that’s almost a 1st round pick they gave up along with other picks for a wide receiver I just don’t think is any good on the NFL level. 1 hour ago, Profound23 said: So they made a few mistakes. First matching the offer to Fuller and giving Burton that contract. Second, drafting for need instead of BPA. Third, mortgaging future picks. They just traded away more future picks. Eventually, that catches up to you. Again, just my opinion. Not stating anything as fact. I wasted a little too much energy arguing with this guy. He thinks the Bears are a "loser" in this draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TB 1 Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 11 minutes ago, AZBearsFan said: Like this one - showed out well at the Shrine Game against better competition and probably fits the rotation early on. A bit late here but the Iggy pick is one I didn’t understand a great deal on its face. Assuming they see him as an ILB (Pace will discuss later) then it’s more of an indictment on Kwiatkowski than I would have expected, and if he’s a smaller situational edge guy then I think there were better guys available to fill that same role. At his size they could project him as a SS too. TBD. Just caught off guard by that one. Easily the worst pick of the draft for us on it’s face value. Fully expect he fills the ST void left by Christian Jones’ departure though. When the pick was made he was announced as an ILB. He can't play the edge in Fangio's scheme. This pick proves that the Bears didn't like the ILB play they when DT 59was out of the lineup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topwop1 Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 1 hour ago, dafreak said: Aaron LemingVerified account @AaronLemingNFL 13m13 minutes ago MorDon't get me wrong, I don't hate the Iggy pick, just have no clue who he is & where he'll play. #Bears Just because most people never heard of this guy before today does not mean he's a bad pick or won't amount to anything in the NFL. Pretty sure NFL scouting departments have way more access to prospect info than the media and posters on draft message boards who like to pretend they know more than they actually do ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAF-N72EX Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 1 minute ago, Superman(DH23) said: I wasted a little too much energy arguing with this guy. He thinks the Bears are a "loser" in this draft. Not too many people outside of Chicago fans pay alot of attention to the Bears and so I always take their opinions with a grain of salt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Profound23 Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 1 minute ago, JustAnotherFan said: Not too many people outside of Chicago fans pay alot of attention to the Bears and so I always take their opinions with a grain of salt. This is not true. I said the Bears were winners on day 1, but didn't like their picks for day 2 and that the last few years they have been trading away future picks too often. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZBearsFan Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 2 minutes ago, TB 1 said: When the pick was made he was announced as an ILB. He can't play the edge in Fangio's scheme. This pick proves that the Bears didn't like the ILB play they when DT 59was out of the lineup. If they saw him on the edge it would only be as a situational rusher for sure. Definitely not big enough for a 3-down role there. His being announced as an ILB doesn’t mean anything as far as where the Bears see him though. Pretty sure they base those off of what they played last year in college. We see guys get introduced all the time at positions they don’t ultimately play in the NFL, especially with linemen (guards announced as tackles, centers announced as guards, etc.) and LB (depending on the drafting team’s scheme). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.