ET80 Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 1 hour ago, disaacs said: It's a mistake for Disney to do this. Their stand-alones of Marvel series, movies, and ESPN probably isn't enough to warrant most people (including me) to purchase their streaming service. I love their Marvel series', but it's not enough to get me to consider it. I'll just pass on it and maybe purchase the seasons on Amazon if/when they show up. Star Wars. Don't forget Star Wars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swede700 Posted August 11, 2017 Share Posted August 11, 2017 2 hours ago, EliteTexan80 said: Star Wars. Don't forget Star Wars. True, can't forget about that...but doesn't really change my mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swede700 Posted August 11, 2017 Share Posted August 11, 2017 4 hours ago, OleXmad said: This, Disney has a sh**load of properties they can do on a streaming service. All of ABC's stuff, Disney Channel,Disney XD, Marvel stuff. Plus all their movies they've built up over the years. They could have done that on Hulu already, since they were part-founders Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xmad Posted August 11, 2017 Share Posted August 11, 2017 4 minutes ago, disaacs said: They could have done that on Hulu already, since they were part-founders They could've but I'd imagine they'd have to share the profits with the other founders of hulu and I doubt disney would want to do that with it's massive list of properties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acgott Posted February 6, 2018 Author Share Posted February 6, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deadpulse Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 Shots fired by Bob Iger haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mox Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 On 8/9/2017 at 8:56 AM, coors said: I think ESPN needs to go the route of creating themselves some original content. People aren't going to want to stream re-runs of Around the Horn. IMO, they need to come up with content along the lines of a Friday Night Lights (TV Show). That is what would get people to turn to an ESPN type of streaming service. My $0.02. I'd rather watch decade old Around the Horn episodes than anything they've done the last few years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Who in the hell is going to pay 5 dollars a month for ESPN? Who? Who is going to pay anything for ESPN? Who? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhioG Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 26 minutes ago, HorizontoZenith said: Who in the hell is going to pay 5 dollars a month for ESPN? Who? Who is going to pay anything for ESPN? Who? Cord cutters? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xmad Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 1 minute ago, ohiogenius said: Cord cutters? Even cord cutters aren't going to pay 5$ for ESPN. People pay for maybe 2 streaming services max and 5$ for what amounts to just sports news and some documentaries isn't worth it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhioG Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 8 minutes ago, OleXmad said: Even cord cutters aren't going to pay 5$ for ESPN. People pay for maybe 2 streaming services max and 5$ for what amounts to just sports news and some documentaries isn't worth it. From their tweet Quote an array of live programming, live sports events ... by the thousands, and other programming like popular 30 for 30 series. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xmad Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 54 minutes ago, ohiogenius said: From their tweet PR speak for "we'll have a ton of content you will probably never watch but it's there" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bucketheadsdad Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 I've plunked down $149 for the season for the 2018 Australian Rules Football (AFL) season (and the half dozen AFL-related programs that are on every day.) I've grown to love the game, and while I wouldn't mind finding "alternative" ways to watch the matches, most of the games are played when I'm sleeping. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE DUKE Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 The only reason I watch ESPN nowadays is college football, college baseball, some MLB, and Monday Night Football. Not sure if that's worth another $5 a month. They should bundle all of the Disney family into one service, but I doubt they will. Disney TV & Movies (isn't Mirimax owned by Disney?)/Fox Movies/Marvel Movies/ABC TV/ESPN. That'd be worth $10-$12 a month. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StLunatic88 Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 59 minutes ago, THE DUKE said: The only reason I watch ESPN nowadays is college football, college baseball, some MLB, and Monday Night Football. Not sure if that's worth another $5 a month. They should bundle all of the Disney family into one service, but I doubt they will. Disney TV & Movies (isn't Mirimax owned by Disney?)/Fox Movies/Marvel Movies/ABC TV/ESPN. That'd be worth $10-$12 a month. MNF could be on the way out anyway, and I wonder how blackout rules will apply when it comes to MLB and this service Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.