It's just odd,
If its 1, and as Swag said I've killed myself because I have the balls to call him out (such a lazy argurment Swag lmao) then why not let my vote be wasted. As it is I'm forced to not vote Swag and the field I can vote for is limited by 1
2 and 3 make more sense, but it still limits who I can vote for. The narrowing of my choices to vote is strategic or just for fun imo. Makes me think better of Squire, but is that the goal. It can basically go any different direction
But then why stop me from voting Swag?
If everyone thinks he is so cleared and refuse to vote him...what does 1 vote on him matter....instead it forces me to vote elsewhere