Predict the Pick: 13, Redskins

[MKnight82]

2 minutes ago, Dashing202 said:

A free safety dude lol we need more play makers on the secondary . 

1. Our safeties play interchangeably.  

2. Nicholson looked great when he played and we just spent a 4th round pick on him.

3. This discussion is pointless but the only FS worth taking that high is Fitzpatrick and he went off the board a long time ago.

 

edit - Actually #1 should be that we have much bigger needs than FS.

[MKnight82]

And for the 3 people that voted QB Josh Allen, did you read the OP where he said all FAs in this mock are assumed to be staying in place?  That means the Redskins would retain Kirk Cousins in this mock.

[Dashing202]

20 minutes ago, MKnight82 said:

1. Our safeties play interchangeably.  

2. Nicholson looked great when he played and we just spent a 4th round pick on him.

3. This discussion is pointless but the only FS worth taking that high is Fitzpatrick and he went off the board a long time ago.

 

edit - Actually #1 should be that we have much bigger needs than FS.

I'm not disagreeing with you so much here . I don't want to go safety in the first . Im 100 percent okay with Payne or Vita . Heck I don't even want a qb in the first if Kirk gone .

 

but dude Nicholson really ? He's a liability . He was out like 4 games and when he played he was always atleast once on the ground .

 

everett stinks to I mean I agree with you on Payne . I am sick and tired of not having a good DL. But we have to continue down the line to find a consistent starting safety dou not just hoping 4th or undrafted guys do the job .

That being said Idk who to go first round yet . I rather trade back tbh .

[Texas_OutLaw7]

16 minutes ago, MKnight82 said:

And for the 3 people that voted QB Josh Allen, did you read the OP where he said all FAs in this mock are assumed to be staying in place?  That means the Redskins would retain Kirk Cousins in this mock.

Yup. Although, you *could* make the argument that the 'skins Tag Kirk and draft a QB of the future. Isn't unreasonable.

[MKnight82]

1 minute ago, Dashing202 said:

I'm not disagreeing with you so much here . I don't want to go safety in the first . Im 100 percent okay with Payne or Vita . Heck I don't even want a qb in the first if Kirk gone .

 

but dude Nicholson really ? He's a liability . He was out like 4 games and when he played he was always atleast once on the ground .

 

everett stinks to I mean I agree with you on Payne . I am sick and tired of not having a good DL. But we have to continue down the line to find a consistent starting safety dou not just hoping 4th or undrafted guys do the job .

 

 

The Dline is 1000x more important than another safety.

[Dashing202]

lol I just noticed this thread in a cowboys forum .

[Dashing202]

1 minute ago, MKnight82 said:

The Dline is 1000x more important than another safety.

lol I agree with you dude I'm just saying .

[Dashing202]

3 minutes ago, Texas_OutLaw7 said:

Yup. Although, you *could* make the argument that the 'skins Tag Kirk and draft a QB of the future. Isn't unreasonable.

lol I think redskins are done with the tag . We have a lot of cap to strike a deal so it's either we sign him or not .

[Dashing202]

I'm gonna watch some videos of starwars 

[Dallas94Ware]

No way Guice lasts to here. If he does, hes gone soon as the Skins are up.

They have a decent backfield with Perine and Thompson and Kelley, but a real gamebreaker to lead the charge, Thompson in on third down and Perine for those tough yardages would be too appealing to a coaching staff that wants to beat you up with the run and slit your throat off the play action.

Perine and Kelley are good, decent runners but neither can compare to the gamebreaking versatility of Guice. And Thompson as a specialist paired alongside him is much harder to gameplan against defensively than Perine and Kelley.

[Dashing202]

I choose Vita , he's 346 pounds and he would anchor the middle . He's athletic as heck for his weight to.

 

[Dashing202]

8 minutes ago, Dallas94Ware said:

No way Guice lasts to here. If he does, hes gone soon as the Skins are up.

They have a decent backfield with Perine and Thompson and Kelley, but a real gamebreaker to lead the charge, Thompson in on third down and Perine for those tough yardages would be too appealing to a coaching staff that wants to beat you up with the run and slit your throat off the play action.

Perine and Kelley are good, decent runners but neither can compare to the gamebreaking versatility of Guice. And Thompson as a specialist paired alongside him is much harder to gameplan against defensively than Perine and Kelley.

No dude Thompson all we have . Perine and Kelly are trash atm 

[Dallas94Ware]

1 hour ago, Dashing202 said:

No dude Thompson all we have . Perine and Kelly are trash atm 

Perine and Kelly are hard runners. But nothing like Guice. He would be the guy Gruden would love at this spot Im sure.

[Texas_OutLaw7]

Interesting race between Allen, Guice, and Payne.

[Dashing202]

51 minutes ago, Dallas94Ware said:

Perine and Kelly are hard runners. But nothing like Guice. He would be the guy Gruden would love at this spot Im sure.

Trust me there baxk ups . Perine always fumbles every game check his stats on that . And kelly ? Idk hes just a 50 yard guy .

i feel you on Guice I agree ! How ever Gruden the type that hates to commit to runs . That's why I'm like redskins just need a dude to complement Thompson.

i actually want us to sign Hyde or Demarco Murray if released .