Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
NcFinest9erFan

Ben Garland Re-signed to One Year Deal

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Mike Person signed a 3 yr 9 million dollar deal last March. If we cut him, what would the forfeit be in cap money? 

Actually there would no forfeit of cap money would there. But we might have to pay some of his remaining salary. So Person probably stays and Skule gets cut. Unless some team is nuts enough to take on Person's contract. 

Wrong again. NFL players contracts, are not guaranteed. So we could cut Mike with no forfeit. 

Edited by uk9erfan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, NinerNation21 said:

Could this be a clue that we may not draft an O-lineman this year? 

The 48 active players takes effect this season or next year?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, uk9erfan said:

Mike Person signed a 3 yr 9 million dollar deal last March. If we cut him, what would the forfeit be in cap money? 

Actually there would no forfeit of cap money would there. But we might have to pay some of his remaining salary. So Person probably stays and Skule gets cut. Unless some team is nuts enough to take on Person's contract. 

Wrong again. NFL players contracts, are not guaranteed. So we could cut Mike with no forfeit. 

But, why would they cut him? He's been very good with Niners since they brought him back. His cap hit this season is $2.5 mil. He's not exactly breaking the bank.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, NinerNation21 said:

But, why would they cut him? He's been very good with Niners since they brought him back. His cap hit this season is $2.5 mil. He's not exactly breaking the bank.

Yep good points and he was playing well but our interior line play was an area of weakness in the playoffs so Brunskill may beat him to the starting role next season. But he does know our scheme well and keeping him would mean not having to teach someone (potentially from scratch). But if we spot an upgrade in the draft the FO could be tempted. This would likely depend on us trading perhaps that number 31 pick for extra picks. I'm rambling a bit so I'll stop. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  



×