LinderFournette Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 1 minute ago, Tugboat said: They called it an INT though. Which is why it's hilarious. I mean he didn't complete the catch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jags Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 9 minutes ago, .Buzz said: This dude man. Let's go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Buzz Posted October 8, 2017 Author Share Posted October 8, 2017 6 minutes ago, LinderFournette said: You know our run d is bad and our pass d is good You dont say? May as well just give them extra yards because of that. Makes sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tugboat Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, LinderFournette said: I mean he didn't complete the catch. And now it goes on Bortles stats in the INT column, where he was already doing just fine filling it up by himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jags Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Well I guess that just happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwny Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 7 minutes ago, LinderFournette said: You know our run d is bad and our pass d is good They can do both from the 5. Variance is harder to account for than a known. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jags Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Just now, Tugboat said: And now it goes on Bortles stats in the INT column, where he was already doing just fine filling it up by himself. As if Bortles had issues with filling the INT column of his stat sheet. Seriously though. How SWAY?!?!?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LinderFournette Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 1 minute ago, Tugboat said: And now it goes on Bortles stats in the INT column, where he was already doing just fine filling it up by himself. 4 ints in 5 games. Im not even mad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwny Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 1 minute ago, LinderFournette said: 4 ints in 5 games. Im not even mad. The 5th game isn’t over yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jags Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Should they start putting * next to interceptions? To note for passes like this and also when a pass bonces off of a WR hands? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tugboat Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, Jags said: Should they start putting * next to interceptions? To note for passes like this and also when a pass bonces off of a WR hands? I think it's funnier if they don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwny Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 5 minutes ago, Jags said: Should they start putting * next to interceptions? To note for passes like this and also when a pass bonces off of a WR hands? There’s a stat that does that. Also counts dropped picks too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jags Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 1 minute ago, iPwn said: There’s a stat that does that. Also counts dropped picks too. Ah ha. Can you use this to tell me how many picks from Blake, that are not on Blake? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwny Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Just now, Jags said: Ah ha. Can you use this to tell me how many picks from Blake, that are not on Blake? I would have to look, but once I find it, yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Buzz Posted October 8, 2017 Author Share Posted October 8, 2017 Defense needs to lock it down here...need a stop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.