beekay414 Posted Thursday at 12:50 AM Author Share Posted Thursday at 12:50 AM 2 minutes ago, Forge said: I think we need 2 forward spots and 1 defenseman. We can probably get by with 1 forward spot and just have a guy buried in the AHL that we bring up as the 13th F every now and again, but given that MacDermid is probably going to play like half the games at least, I'm not sure if we want to run a short group. Going to be a lot of 20+ minute games for out main guys when MacDermid is in there. The goalies aren't that big of a deal since they'll just be buried anyway, but we really don't have a lot of play room in terms of money. One big money add plus two very light depth pieces. When guys like Teddy Blueger are getting 2 million aav, doesn't give you a ton of wiggle room. Those things add up Will be interesting to see what Fitz has in store. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted Thursday at 12:58 AM Share Posted Thursday at 12:58 AM 7 minutes ago, beekay414 said: Will be interesting to see what Fitz has in store. ruh roh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted Thursday at 01:01 AM Author Share Posted Thursday at 01:01 AM Just now, Forge said: ruh roh We'll see. I want McGroarty too then. Might as well trade Mercer for McGroarty+ to save money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted Thursday at 06:25 PM Author Share Posted Thursday at 06:25 PM We should've traded 10 for 14 and 42. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted Thursday at 07:45 PM Share Posted Thursday at 07:45 PM 1 hour ago, beekay414 said: We should've traded 10 for 14 and 42. Yeah, I'm sad we didn't do that. Fitz is terrified of trading up or down in a draft. I don't think he's ever done it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted Thursday at 07:47 PM Share Posted Thursday at 07:47 PM Would explain necas being moved too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted Thursday at 08:00 PM Author Share Posted Thursday at 08:00 PM 12 minutes ago, Forge said: Would explain necas being moved too Would also explain why we didn't trade 10 for 14 and 42. There's probably helium to that 10 for Necas rumor. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted yesterday at 06:20 PM Author Share Posted yesterday at 06:20 PM Do we think we have the space to make a move for Trenin while also making the plays on the top 6 forward and top 4 dman? Trenin is perfect for our bottom 6. Gets kinda complicated with all the left handed shots in the bottom 6 and the money there since I'm not sure we want someone making $3+ Million on the 4th line. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted 23 hours ago Author Share Posted 23 hours ago 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago Guess the pesce thing is legit. supposedly trying to move Marino Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago 12 minutes ago, beekay414 said: Kinda dumb, not going to lie. Marino's deal is an absolute sweetheart deal at 4.4 x3. Pesce and guys this year are all going to get 6-7. And then we still need to solve LHD situation. And it sounds like we are really trying to move that pick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago Supposedly Nashville in play for Marino Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted 23 hours ago Author Share Posted 23 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Forge said: And then we still need to solve LHD situation. Marino may solve the LHD situation tho. Just depends on what we do with him and #10. It's all fluid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago 1 minute ago, beekay414 said: Marino may solve the LHD situation tho. Just depends on what we do with him and #10. It's all fluid. This would probably be the best case scenario. I'm not sure who would be out there that would be comparable to Marino on the left side, but definitely the best way to go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted 23 hours ago Author Share Posted 23 hours ago 1 minute ago, Forge said: This would probably be the best case scenario. I'm not sure who would be out there that would be comparable to Marino on the left side, but definitely the best way to go. Shea Theodore Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.