beekay414 Posted May 25 Author Share Posted May 25 65-70 with Jack is probably a light projection too btw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted May 25 Author Share Posted May 25 On 5/24/2024 at 6:31 AM, Rainmaker90 said: How would you describe his defensive philosophy ? Conservative ? Aggressive? Is he a Joe Barry ( where in hockey I’d like a more conservative defense ) or a not Joe Barry lol This guy goes through Keefe's system better than I ever could. https://x.com/jp_gambatese 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted May 28 Share Posted May 28 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted May 28 Share Posted May 28 Pronman's final rankings are definitely slightly different from the consensus rankings. Tij at 13, MBN at 17, Helenius at 14, Dickinson at 11. Yakemchuk at 3(!), Catton at 6 (no issues with this from an actual play standpoint...dude is an offensive juggernaut) and Sennecke all the way up at 7. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted May 28 Share Posted May 28 It's over 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted May 28 Author Share Posted May 28 3 hours ago, Forge said: Carle would've been interesting as hell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 Officially lose the rights to jaromir pytlick today Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted June 2 Share Posted June 2 Probably nothing, but interesting for dreger to suggest that maybe New Jersey isn't a team markstrom would waive for now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted June 2 Author Share Posted June 2 1 hour ago, Forge said: Probably nothing, but interesting for dreger to suggest that maybe New Jersey isn't a team markstrom would waive for now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted June 3 Author Share Posted June 3 It's probably dumb but I really want Stammer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted June 3 Share Posted June 3 1 hour ago, beekay414 said: It's probably dumb but I really want Stammer I'd rather cirelli just for long term stuff. I figure we'll probably have 6-7 million to get one quality forward Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted June 3 Author Share Posted June 3 Just now, Forge said: I'd rather cirelli just for long term stuff. I figure we'll probably have 6-7 million to get one quality forward I'd love Cirelli but BriseBois is a great GM and I don't think he's gonna give Cirelli up to bring back a 34 year old Stamkos. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 Would you trade the #10 pick for Drake Batherson? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rainmaker90 Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 15 minutes ago, Forge said: Would you trade the #10 pick for Drake Batherson? I generally don’t agree with this approach but in our situation, yes. id rather go for a double than the HR. Especially since Batherson seems pretty safe. We have our core, now we just gotta surround them with a great cast. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted June 5 Share Posted June 5 I am Jacks' complete lack of surprise Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.