Utley Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 Just now, 11sanchez11 said: how is this important tho? you know we have mostly lynched civs right? Because you've been insistent on me from the beginning. It's either tunneling, or you always knew my role and knew I'd be difficult to hit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
11sanchez11 Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 1 minute ago, utley4568 said: Because you've been insistent on me from the beginning. It's either tunneling, or you always knew my role and knew I'd be difficult to hit. that's reasonable (not being sarcastic) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 @utley4568 what is your ability called? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 15 minutes ago, utley4568 said: Not as perfect as RMIB's immunity to the first lynch. If I die, remember how often Sanchez came after me. Starting to think he has an investigation and that's why he knew @james.mcmurry13's role I really don't think the mafia would have two investigators Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Utley Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 3 minutes ago, theuntouchable said: @utley4568 what is your ability called? Recall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
11sanchez11 Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 2 minutes ago, theuntouchable said: I really don't think the mafia would have two investigators assuming there is a [spam] they could just communicate their info in [spam] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 @james.mcmurry13 what description would you say makes more sense? a person who can avoid a hit and then gets a hit? or someone who avoids a lynch? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 4 minutes ago, 11sanchez11 said: assuming there is a [spam] they could just communicate their info in [spam] There would still need to be two invests though as we know that dome investigated KSJ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Utley Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 Just now, theuntouchable said: @james.mcmurry13 what description would you say makes more sense? a person who can avoid a hit and then gets a hit? or someone who avoids a lynch? If it helps, apparently the move is like a time rewind of 3 seconds in the game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Utley Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 Just now, theuntouchable said: There would still need to be two invests though as we know that dome investigated KSJ. How do we know that? And they could've earned another somehow right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 Just now, utley4568 said: How do we know that? And they could've earned another somehow right? Well it's not 100% but I tracked dome N1 and he visited KSJ, N2 they hit KSJ and he was the reviver. I'm assuming it was an invest because there was a couple different cleared players at this point and they wouldn't shy away from one of them to take a shot in the dark unless they knew KSJs role. as far as earning another one, they would have had to earn it and use it on N1 as Sanchez mentioned it D2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Utley Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 Just now, theuntouchable said: Well it's not 100% but I tracked dome N1 and he visited KSJ, N2 they hit KSJ and he was the reviver. I'm assuming it was an invest because there was a couple different cleared players at this point and they wouldn't shy away from one of them to take a shot in the dark unless they knew KSJs role. as far as earning another one, they would have had to earn it and use it on N1 as Sanchez mentioned it D2. Not ruling it out. Dome could've also had more than one invest from the start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 I'm inclined to believe utley over RMIB. #1 utley didn't have a big reason to reveal his role #2 he clear hadn't read up very well as he was wanting to lynch James and #3 I don't see him sticking his neck out like that for nothing that I can see as a motive. RMIB is the one who brought it up that Bucs was not actually clear. I ran with it trying to drum up some conversation but no one really bit. Then he retracts a bit from that and says the Bucs theory is far fertched. The more likely motive I see here is to pull votes off of mookie (he was the leading vote getter at the time RMIB came out) and shed some dirt on utley. also, if RMIB is tracer why not just come out with that outright. People who CC come out guns blazing ready to completely go after the person who falsely claimed. RMIB didn't do that and I believe even switched his vote off of utley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 3 minutes ago, utley4568 said: Not ruling it out. Dome could've also had more than one invest from the start. I would have seen everyone that he targeted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 9 minutes ago, theuntouchable said: I'm inclined to believe utley over RMIB. #1 utley didn't have a big reason to reveal his role #2 he clear hadn't read up very well as he was wanting to lynch James and #3 I don't see him sticking his neck out like that for nothing that I can see as a motive. RMIB is the one who brought it up that Bucs was not actually clear. I ran with it trying to drum up some conversation but no one really bit. Then he retracts a bit from that and says the Bucs theory is far fertched. The more likely motive I see here is to pull votes off of mookie (he was the leading vote getter at the time RMIB came out) and shed some dirt on utley. also, if RMIB is tracer why not just come out with that outright. People who CC come out guns blazing ready to completely go after the person who falsely claimed. RMIB didn't do that and I believe even switched his vote off of utley. This is probably the most comprehensive argument I've seen all game. I've CCed people before and I went all out. You pound the table for that all day and all night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.a73598d31140328dafdc27310237100d.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.