Jump to content

2020 NHL Draft Thread | What are the Devils Mukhamadullin?


flyers0909

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, RaidersAreOne said:

Who are the best availables? Bet we trade down again. 🙃

You'll get some huge variance at this point. 

Robins is a favorite of a lot of guys. Smilanic. I really like Hunt. Poirier is a super interesting guy. I really like Gushchin, but he's super risky given his size. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Forge said:

Thats about right for me with Mysak. I know that people absolutely loved him, but I think he's a bottom 6 guy. His shooting percentage was off the charts in juniors, not sustainable. 

Nah. He's a middle 6 guy. I had him grouped with Mercer for that reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, beekay414 said:

But this is the 2nd guy you've used shooting percentage for to downgrade so I'm not shocked. 🤪

For sure. I just think it's an outlier and I Have to consider it. I mean, let's be honest...don't you think there's a difference in how you perceive Quinn if you say "he's a 50 goal scorer" and "he's a 35 goal scorer"? People on the devils board in particular, the ones who don't watch, they are enamored with big round numbers like "50". If I don't think that they are likely to translate that stuff to the next level, i have to dock them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, beekay414 said:

lol Detroit gonna take nothing but Swedes ey?

If I remember right, their Euro scout is considered absolutely one of the best in the business, so they could just be leaning on him a lot 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Forge said:

For sure. I just think it's an outlier and I Have to consider it. I mean, let's be honest...don't you think there's a difference in how you perceive Quinn if you say "he's a 50 goal scorer" and "he's a 35 goal scorer"? People on the devils board in particular, the ones who don't watch, they are enamored with big round numbers like "50". If I don't think that they are likely to translate that stuff to the next level, i have to dock them. 

No because I don't put a ton of stock into junior production. If you're being realistic for Quinn, you know he's not going to pot 50 in the NHL. He's going to be a 2 way, 60 point winger consistently. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, beekay414 said:

No because I don't put a ton of stock into junior production. If you're being realistic for Quinn, you know he's not going to pot 50 in the NHL. He's going to be a 2 way, 60 point winger consistently. 

Then I Have no idea how you had him ranked 15. That kind of profile should have been like 6th lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Forge said:

Then I Have no idea how you had him ranked 15. That kind of profile should have been like 6th lol

I mean, I also had Holtz 11. My top 10 was basically who I thought had ridiculous top line upside. I like Quinn enough. You can interchange everyone in that 11-15 range for me tbqh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...