Scoundrel Posted November 4, 2020 Share Posted November 4, 2020 I went with WSR. No Gilmore, Bouye has looked rusty in his return to action. Bradberry is mentioned in the lineup but not mentioned in the game plan as Dantzler is the fourth CB. I’m used to seeing mistakes being guys listed in the game plan mislisted in the lineup... so this was an interesting one, but I’m not going to weigh the game on this. I think WSR takes advantage of a couple of matchups in the secondary regardless. I think WSR is able to get some good pressure as Burns has been playing well as a rusher and Barrett leads the league in Pressures for an edge player while Jawaan Taylor has struggled with pass blocking. Allen has Hopkins now and he makes a difference but I think they lose a close one 24-20. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WFLukic Posted November 4, 2020 Share Posted November 4, 2020 The Bradberry v Gilmore thing shouldn't even be a consideration for anyone in the slightest. It's just a typo, Bradberry isn't going to be named in the starting line-up, play the first snap and then go to the parking lot and drive home. Bradberry is clearly meant to be on Ridley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted November 4, 2020 Share Posted November 4, 2020 1 hour ago, WFLukic said: The Bradberry v Gilmore thing shouldn't even be a consideration for anyone in the slightest. It's just a typo, Bradberry isn't going to be named in the starting line-up, play the first snap and then go to the parking lot and drive home. Bradberry is clearly meant to be on Ridley Maybe but if the situation was reversed you'd be making the same argument. That's quite a typo, I mean you had all week to prepare, Gilmore was trending toward not playing all week, but somehow you didn't think to add Bradberry in your gameplan at all. You even included your #4, mediocre CB but didn't even mention your #1 outside of listing him on the roster? I list 8 guys on my bench every week, that doesn't mean im.using them unless I specifically mention them. Just saying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted November 4, 2020 Share Posted November 4, 2020 2 hours ago, WFLukic said: The Bradberry v Gilmore thing shouldn't even be a consideration for anyone in the slightest. It's just a typo, Bradberry isn't going to be named in the starting line-up, play the first snap and then go to the parking lot and drive home. Bradberry is clearly meant to be on Ridley Said I wasn’t weighing the game on it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WFLukic Posted November 4, 2020 Share Posted November 4, 2020 1 hour ago, wwhickok said: Maybe but if the situation was reversed you'd be making the same argument. That's quite a typo, I mean you had all week to prepare, Gilmore was trending toward not playing all week, but somehow you didn't think to add Bradberry in your gameplan at all. You even included your #4, mediocre CB but didn't even mention your #1 outside of listing him on the roster? I list 8 guys on my bench every week, that doesn't mean im.using them unless I specifically mention them. Just saying. Stop with the dishonesty. I didn't name Gilmore in my lineup - I clearly knew he was out. Takes about 5 brain cells to get that. It is obvious that Bradberry was meant to be written in my gameplan instead of Gilmore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WFLukic Posted November 4, 2020 Share Posted November 4, 2020 45 minutes ago, Counselor said: Said I wasn’t weighing the game on it Wasn't aimed at you, just to make it clear for future voters since there's obviously been yourself and Bcb who have brought attention to it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted November 4, 2020 Share Posted November 4, 2020 1 hour ago, WFLukic said: Stop with the dishonesty. I didn't name Gilmore in my lineup - I clearly knew he was out. Takes about 5 brain cells to get that. It is obvious that Bradberry was meant to be written in my gameplan instead of Gilmore. Nothing i said was dishonest so can you, for the love of God, stop with the personal attacks. I'm about sick and tired of it. You NAMED Gilmore in your gameplan regardless of what you did with your roster. How people interpret that is their business. You say you knew he was out, you say its obvious that Bradberry was meant to be written in there, but you didn't do it. Did you not proof read your gameplan? I'm sorry, thats on you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted November 4, 2020 Share Posted November 4, 2020 2 hours ago, wwhickok said: Nothing i said was dishonest so can you, for the love of God, stop with the personal attacks. I'm about sick and tired of it. You NAMED Gilmore in your gameplan regardless of what you did with your roster. How people interpret that is their business. You say you knew he was out, you say its obvious that Bradberry was meant to be written in there, but you didn't do it. Did you not proof read your gameplan? I'm sorry, thats on you. We shouldn't get into that, because your game plan says his entire front 7 only has 7.5 tackles on the year. So people make mistakes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted November 4, 2020 Share Posted November 4, 2020 6 minutes ago, Jlash said: We shouldn't get into that, because your game plan says his entire front 7 only has 7.5 tackles on the year. So people make mistakes. Yeah that's fair. Sjppoaed to say 7.5 sacks though for the record. But thats slightly different than simply not actually using a guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted November 4, 2020 Share Posted November 4, 2020 After tons of back and forth I went Williamsport here. I think once NO gets fully healthy they're going to be damn near impossible to beat, but this isn't a great match up. They can plan to stack the box, but with the pressure Henry puts on you, having only 1 extra DT to rotate in I think all in all they're going to get worn down as the game goes on. WW's corners are very good, and that will limit Josh Allen. Although I considered voting against WW just for giving Jeremy Chinn his own offensive play out of nowhere, but I know that's not fair. At least use an offensive player for a trick play considering......you know.....Taysom Hill and all. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted November 4, 2020 Share Posted November 4, 2020 1 hour ago, Jlash said: After tons of back and forth I went Williamsport here. I think once NO gets fully healthy they're going to be damn near impossible to beat, but this isn't a great match up. They can plan to stack the box, but with the pressure Henry puts on you, having only 1 extra DT to rotate in I think all in all they're going to get worn down as the game goes on. WW's corners are very good, and that will limit Josh Allen. Although I considered voting against WW just for giving Jeremy Chinn his own offensive play out of nowhere, but I know that's not fair. At least use an offensive player for a trick play considering......you know.....Taysom Hill and all. Chinn actually had a rush this past week for 28 yards. That wasn't out of nowhere Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted November 4, 2020 Share Posted November 4, 2020 5 minutes ago, wwhickok said: Chinn actually had a rush this past week for 28 yards. That wasn't out of nowhere It was on special teams not offense on a fake punt 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted November 4, 2020 Share Posted November 4, 2020 2 hours ago, Counselor said: It was on special teams not offense on a fake punt Didn't know that tbh but if be can do it on a fake punt, he can do it on offense its kind of the same thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted November 4, 2020 Share Posted November 4, 2020 1 minute ago, wwhickok said: Didn't know that tbh but if be can do it on a fake punt, he can do it on offense its kind of the same thing. It’s not really. It’s the element of surprise. Seen Punters do it. Doesn’t mean you give them a chance on offense to do it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted November 4, 2020 Share Posted November 4, 2020 Just now, Counselor said: It’s not really. It’s the element of surprise. Seen Punters do it. Doesn’t mean you give them a chance on offense to do it. I mean element of surprise and all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.