beekay414 Posted May 24 Author Share Posted May 24 1 minute ago, Forge said: Especially on defense I have a feeling that the Siegs **** talk will die real quick under Keefe. He may even get Bahl to look good and use his size. We have so much damn talent to be as piss poor as we were under those two hapless clowns last year. ******* top pair Brendan Smith of all the guys we had lmao. **** you Lindy. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted May 24 Author Share Posted May 24 Apparently Weekes said that Fitzy promised Keefe a goalie so...yeah. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 1 hour ago, beekay414 said: Apparently Weekes said that Fitzy promised Keefe a goalie so...yeah. Buckle up. If we give up 10 for markstrom or ullmark I'll go bonkers lol 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 Oh, apparently we did make a push for ullmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 Okay, not touching this trade if this is what Ottawa is offering lol A league executive said Thursday he believes the Senators would likely have to offer defenceman Jakob Chychrun along with a first-round pick and another selection to acquire Ullmark. Even then, he has the hammer because he does have the modified no-trade clause. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rainmaker90 Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 9 hours ago, beekay414 said: I'm just excited to have a structured defensive system for the first time in ******* ages. Tired of the ridiculous amounts of wide open collapses that Ruff's and Hynes' systems before him had. Fix the goaltending and this team takes off overnight under Keefe. We're more talented than the Leafs, no question about it. How would you describe his defensive philosophy ? Conservative ? Aggressive? Is he a Joe Barry ( where in hockey I’d like a more conservative defense ) or a not Joe Barry lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rainmaker90 Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 Anyone else having trouble posting tweets ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 1 hour ago, Rainmaker90 said: Anyone else having trouble posting tweets ? Yup, you have to manually change X -> in your browser before posting to here now. Major PITA. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted May 25 Author Share Posted May 25 Would you do #10 to Nashville for #22, #53 and #55 with the idea of turning pick #22 into Anthony Cirelli (7x6.25 left on his deal). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted May 25 Author Share Posted May 25 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted May 25 Share Posted May 25 3 hours ago, beekay414 said: Would you do #10 to Nashville for #22, #53 and #55 with the idea of turning pick #22 into Anthony Cirelli (7x6.25 left on his deal). I think you have to give up 10 for cirelli. I think other teams beat 22 and Tampa tends to ship off their guys to the West. But I'd do it those trade downs to get him I think Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted May 25 Author Share Posted May 25 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Forge said: I think you have to give up 10 for cirelli. I think other teams beat 22 and Tampa tends to ship off their guys to the West. But I'd do it those trade downs to get him I think Yeah, I was thinking of a way to not give up 10 straight up and gain assets to make it happen but you're probably right. It's a hefty price but Cirelli might be the type that pops off with a heavy load. EDIT - Maybe 10 for Cirelli and the 4th they do have. Or better yet, Cirelli and a 6th LOL Edited May 25 by beekay414 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted May 25 Author Share Posted May 25 We could use Cirelli, that's for sure. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted May 25 Share Posted May 25 1 minute ago, beekay414 said: We could use Cirelli, that's for sure. 100%. Also, sticking him with Jack could potentially unlock a little offense Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted May 25 Author Share Posted May 25 3 minutes ago, Forge said: 100%. Also, sticking him with Jack could potentially unlock a little offense He goes from 45 points to probably 65-70 with Jack and he takes faceoffs. It's a great idea if it's an actual avenue to be explored. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.