James Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 2 hours ago, Malfatron said: i read back to tk3s questions and they seem forced to me. thoughts frpm anyone else? It wouldn't make sense for him to have been anything but genuine there. If they're red and he didn't vote squire then he really must've been confused. If they're green why would he lie about being confused? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 2 minutes ago, James said: It wouldn't make sense for him to have been anything but genuine there. If they're red and he didn't vote squire then he really must've been confused. If they're green why would he lie about being confused? maybe tk3 thought they could get over in ot? didnt count on you switching your vote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 1 minute ago, Malfatron said: maybe tk3 thought they could get over in ot? didnt count on you switching your vote Why risk OT though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 Just now, James said: Why risk OT though? to not look so bad as to vote himself at the deadline maybe he didnt know the vc maybe chatty was dead Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 Just now, Malfatron said: to not look so bad as to vote himself at the deadline maybe he didnt know the vc maybe chatty was dead That's kinda my point though. If he's scum, to not simply hammer his team probably means he was actually confused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 Basically I'm saying he probably was confused about the game mechanics, but that doesn't really tell us anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 Just now, James said: That's kinda my point though. If he's scum, to not simply hammer his team probably means he was actually confused. maybe. i buy the part about him not knowing the vc but he said that he didnt know whether his partner was guaranteed to be green. thats mostly the part i doubt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 Just now, James said: Basically I'm saying he probably was confused about the game mechanics, but that doesn't really tell us anything. it does. because if hes mafia, he knows his partner is mafia too bc he has the chatty linm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 22 hours ago, Tk3 said: so this game is like... opposite of mafia? is that why there are so many self-votes? 22 hours ago, Tk3 said: I know my partner... Do all pairs share the same alignment? ie, are reds with reds and greens with greens? 22 hours ago, Tk3 said: I know, but like I said, I just got home and logged in, opened the thread, and malf immediately told me to vote squire, and then vote et. I wasn't read up and prepared to just listen to him on either count. for reference Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 21 hours ago, Tk3 said: it's like last game. I read my PM, I rad the first page. It didn't expressly say that teams shared an alignment. Then immediately you were telling me where to vote, and someone mentioned that they knew who my partner was, and I was trying to read up on where that information was shared. If I were red, I wouldn't care whether we shared an alignment or not- I would know that voting squire would be good for me regardless. As green, I didn't know if it would be a good thing or a bad thing until the alignment sharing was cleared up. also this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 tk3 seems to know just what a civ and a mafia would do in his situation, and hes picking the civ way. if he was mafia, he would pick the civ way too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 2 minutes ago, Malfatron said: it does. because if hes mafia, he knows his partner is mafia too bc he has the chatty linm Hmm. Good point. If he was mafia I imagine he'd check in with chat before posting here. It still strikes me as a weird lie to tell though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickle Rick Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 3 minutes ago, Malfatron said: 21 hours ago, Tk3 said: it's like last game. I read my PM, I rad the first page. It didn't expressly say that teams shared an alignment. Then immediately you were telling me where to vote, and someone mentioned that they knew who my partner was, and I was trying to read up on where that information was shared. If I were red, I wouldn't care whether we shared an alignment or not- I would know that voting squire would be good for me regardless. As green, I didn't know if it would be a good thing or a bad thing until the alignment sharing was cleared up. also this Yet he knew et and gopher were partners....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickle Rick Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 1 hour ago, squire12 said: Touch 1 hour ago, theuntouchable said: No 1 hour ago, squire12 said: Squire I also don't like this exchange @Malfatron. Just bc someone tells you no doesn't mean you switch off that vote immediately Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 22 hours ago, bcb1213 said: Second round in a row we weren't pushed over last minute. Just saying if you and shady are scum, the other scum team wouldnt risk it. if they did,they would be toast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.