VigilantZombie Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 1 minute ago, Counselor said: And sometimes that happens. It still has to be accounted for when voting. I don't have an issue with people holding the running back issue against me I think that was a fair comment that isn't what I have an issue with Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 How the narrative been that while he didn't account for the number for wide receiver that you believe that the pass rush is gonna get there before I can get the ball to that guy anyway or that you believe that Because my running game will be less effective in the 2nd half I will struggle in the passing game I could buy those arguments but that's not what you said. What you said was that he would make an adjustment something he did not write in to his game plan and would then account for the number 4 Wide receiver something else he did not do in his game plan and therefore would win by 3 points. Maybe I'm wrong but I get that there is no specific way that we have got to vote on these games but what we can and should be basing the Game plan on is what is actually written in the game plan. In regards to the running backs unfortunately that bit me in the Backside this week that's on me that's not on anybody else I had no way of knowing that but that's what the game plan is. That same logic should be applied to my opponent Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 I like both offense a lot. WSR has the better QB, but NO has a solid QB too and a better supporting cast. I like WWs idea to run a 3-4 since that funnels run plays to their active LBs, but in the same breath NOs OL is as good as any in this league IMO and I think Elliott will find running room in this game. Both teams will do well in pass defense, but with WW committing to keeping his safeties back deep all game to avoid the play action bomb NO chews up clock and moves the ball. NO 20-14. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 3 minutes ago, wwhickok said: I really don't mind losing even though it is somewhat frustrating what I do mind is the inconsistency from people one week to the next where it seems like what's good for 1 guy isn't good for the other and vice versa this is what my double standard comment was about. If you gonna vote be consistent about it and I'm sorry but I got dinged fairly For mccoy being my only running back. Because I didn't add someone else to my game plan. But you legit just added an adjustment to his game plan for him that he did not add to benefit him in a way that gave him the win. That's inconsistent as all hell. OK you win 175 21 because he'll never cover your fourth wide receiver. That make you happy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 Just now, bcb1213 said: OK you win 175 21 because he'll never cover your fourth wide receiver. That make you happy I don't have to win the game I think you're missing the point. Actually I don't think you're missing the point at all I think you are ignoring it By others I was 'penalized for what I did and didn't do in my gameplan. By you I was penalized for what my opponent didnt write into his gameplan. Because you 'added it for him'. I dont feel you made a fair arguement. I think there are other argument you could have made that are completely fair but the one that you made I dont think is fair. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 4 minutes ago, Jlash said: I like both offense a lot. WSR has the better QB, but NO has a solid QB too and a better supporting cast. I like WWs idea to run a 3-4 since that funnels run plays to their active LBs, but in the same breath NOs OL is as good as any in this league IMO and I think Elliott will find running room in this game. Both teams will do well in pass defense, but with WW committing to keeping his safeties back deep all game to avoid the play action bomb NO chews up clock and moves the ball. NO 20-14. Fair arguement. I've gotta find a 'middle ground' with my defense I just dont think I quite have the personnel yet. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 13 minutes ago, wwhickok said: I really don't mind losing even though it is somewhat frustrating what I do mind is the inconsistency from people one week to the next where it seems like what's good for 1 guy isn't good for the other and vice versa this is what my double standard comment was about. If you gonna vote be consistent about it and I'm sorry but I got dinged fairly For mccoy being my only running back. Because I didn't add someone else to my game plan. But you legit just added an adjustment to his game plan for him that he did not add to benefit him in a way that gave him the win. That's inconsistent as all hell. I literally gave you a touchdown for him messing up. You'd adjust and put Dorsett in more full time, he'd adjust and cover the fourth WR. Dorsett probably makes another big play down the line against crsppy fourth cb/s. You score again. That's a ll the points you get cause Mccoy is gassed and the rest of your weapons get locked down. Apparantly I have to write xmad length write up to respond to two games Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 (edited) 3 minutes ago, bcb1213 said: I literally gave you a touchdown for him messing up. You'd adjust and put Dorsett in more full time, he'd adjust and cover the fourth WR. Dorsett probably makes another big play down the line against crsppy fourth cb/s. You score again. That's a ll the points you get cause Mccoy is gassed and the rest of your weapons get locked down. Apparantly I have to write xmad length write up to respond to two games Why guy said you're are ignoring the point. Did I add an adjustment for a number four wide receiver other than stating that I was gonna run it? No. Did he account for the number 4 wide receiver? No. Did he add an adjustment for the number four wide receiver? No. Did you do that for him? Yes. You didn't say anything about LeSean mccoy in your argument. I mean to be completely fair you didn't even make much of an argument you could have left it at 17:14 and I wouldn't have said a thing Edited September 25, 2019 by wwhickok Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 Anyway even if you take away BC b's though I still lost by several votes so doesn't matter that wasn't my point but I'm moving on now. GG Jazz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 Just now, wwhickok said: Why guy said you're are ignoring the point. Did I add an adjustment for a number four wide receiver other than stating that I was gonna run it? No. Did he account for the number 4 wide receiver? No. Did he add an adjustment for the number four wide receiver? No. Did you do that for him? Yes. You didn't say anything about LeSean mccoy in your argument. I'm moving on from this. Honestly it's either 175-21 or he adjusts. Your pick. I'm done checking this out thread Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 (edited) . Edited September 25, 2019 by wwhickok Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 10 minutes ago, bcb1213 said: I'm moving on from this. Honestly it's either 175-21 or he adjusts. Your pick. I'm done checking this out thread Here is what I'm trying to figure out this is really my point and I'm not trying to ruffle sather that were tell you how to vote where tell you how to critique a game plan because if R them going turn there isn't any one way you can look at a game plan and make a decision when I'm asking what I really am getting at is what is the etiquette here? I see house the people pointing out the negative for things that are not written into the game plan and then I see other people making arguments in their comments as the where while something isn't in the game plan it would be and it benefits them. I don't care how you critique my team I really don't. If you view me as having miles Boykin as my number for wide receiver because of the way I have listed my reserves and because I didn't add a number next to them that is a flaw I think that's a fair argument. If the etiquette is that is people want to assume adjustments are being made in word that into their comments then OK I'm fine with it but oppositis point that isn't something I've been seen get done so a comes off as a little inconsistent to me but it's that something that is normal feel free to say that did I will view it differently moving forward Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 I made this point less for me about my game and more for me to learn how to approach other people's games because I don't wanna be doing something shouldn't be getting done in the 1st place and I'm not saying that what you did shouldn't be getting done it's the question I'm really asking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 48 minutes ago, wwhickok said: Fair arguement. I've gotta find a 'middle ground' with my defense I just dont think I quite have the personnel yet. I liked the gameplan though. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted September 25, 2019 Author Share Posted September 25, 2019 I’m going to abstain from this match as I played a role in Williamsport’s game planning this week Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.