SwAg Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 Jesus Christ. How is this Mafia? If I go back and compile a numerical list of the arguments will you tell me if those are what I’m supposed to respond to? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 4 minutes ago, The Orca said: At this point llama needs to be the lynch. He hasnt helped and his reaction to the whole thing up until now has more or less been nonexistent. Now what I will caution you on is the "If Llama is town we lynch Touch next" stance. There is a more than likley scenario that Touch is town and did jump the gun and wanted to see how people reacted. His posting of who would you kill then tranfering to ****,marry, kill (yet somehow I got who do you want to kill you lol) showed a thought process of where he was trying to solve the game imo. At this juncture I'd say Touch is town and if Dome now is claiming the Kotn is 100% town claim as fake, then the best lynch is llama (who I think really did claim unblockable kill and when I pointed it out was told to say it was not his claim). That's what is sticking out the most imo on llama He didnt pick an easy target. If he wanted an easy target he picks me. That would have easily ended in my lynch. He picked a target he thought was scummy....based on his replies I can see that being what he thought. Now reckless I agree with. Being reckless is more of a town read imo. Touch isnt a reckless play as scum (not saying him changing MOs isnt possible). He routinely tells me just flat out no, when I have suggested things as mafia with him before and not even that reckless of stuff. He is a calm patient player when mafia. That's why he blends well I changed up some questions based on responses of what I was looking for. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 Just now, theuntouchable said: Oh, I’m sorry. Was I suppose to continue reading beyond the hypocritical viewpoint you started with? You’re ******* retarded if you’re being serious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 6 minutes ago, theuntouchable said: The gladiator gif was my claim. Guessing most already had that deduced from the prior posts at that time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 1 minute ago, SwAg said: Bro, I’ve asked you to give me a list of your arguments to respond to and you keep posting these run-on sentences and issuing declarations. Because I have said them, repeatedly. I also know what you’re attempting to do here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 1 minute ago, SwAg said: You’re ******* retarded if you’re being serious. That’s a legit question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 1 minute ago, squire12 said: Guessing most already had that deduced from the prior posts at that time. Maybe, maybe not but I wanted to make it clear what I was claiming and it was a perfect opportunity to use that gif. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 I’m literally repeating the definition for the federal rules of evidence and plausibility pleading as my standard and complied with that format in my initial post, and you’re rambling incoherently while declaring a bunch of nonsense based on half a post that you misread and half a post that you’re repeating and saying I’m a hypocrite, while saying I have nothing of substance. Youre doing this as a bit to avoid any action that could expose you in a close lynch. You need the confusion and incoherence and talking points. I’m trying to clarify; you’re trying to obscure. The fact that so many people are content treating this as equivalent is beyond me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 2 minutes ago, theuntouchable said: Because I have said them, repeatedly. I also know what you’re attempting to do here. I’m attempting to clarify. Are you ******* serious. I’ve now even offered to do the leg work for you so you can’t say I’m just trying to waste your time, all you’ve got to say is “yes” or “no,” or maybe even be actually interested in the game and tell me what you want answered in a ******* coherent format. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 1 minute ago, SwAg said: I’m literally repeating the definition for the federal rules of evidence and plausibility pleading as my standard and complied with that format in my initial post, and you’re rambling incoherently while declaring a bunch of nonsense based on half a post that you misread and half a post that you’re repeating and saying I’m a hypocrite, while saying I have nothing of substance. Youre doing this as a bit to avoid any action that could expose you in a close lynch. You need the confusion and incoherence and talking points. I’m trying to clarify; you’re trying to obscure. The fact that so many people are content treating this as equivalent is beyond me. And what about when I have already defined those on numerous occasions? Am I still trying to obscure? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 “I know what you’re trying to do.” Trying to get you to repeat questions in a coherent fashion so I can answer your ******* questions. Jesus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 Take it as a compliment that I think you’re scum because there’s no way you’re this ******* stupid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 1 minute ago, SwAg said: I’m attempting to clarify. Are you ******* serious. I’ve now even offered to do the leg work for you so you can’t say I’m just trying to waste your time, all you’ve got to say is “yes” or “no,” or maybe even be actually interested in the game and tell me what you want answered in a ******* coherent format. It’s been a coherent format since you started this charade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 2 minutes ago, theuntouchable said: Maybe, maybe not but I wanted to make it clear what I was claiming and it was a perfect opportunity to use that gif. Why quote @rackcss votevote then? Reads to me like an appeal for his vote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 Just now, squire12 said: Why quote @rackcss votevote then? Reads to me like an appeal for his vote. It fit the context of the gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.