Jump to content

Rayne Dakota Prescott


textaz03

What do you wanna see happen with Dak?   

20 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you wanna see happen with Dak?

    • Keep and resign
      7
    • Cut pre-June 1st
      0
    • Cut post June 1st
      2
    • Trade prior March 17
      11


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, TVScout said:

No he was not wide open at :26. He got wide open after Dak threw the ball on a pre planned route. Same for the pick 6. Those are plays where Dak throws the ball when and where he is told to.  Taking into account the degeneracy of the coaching there is no QB in history that could have won.

Not at 0:26… the play that is snapped at 0:26. Now you’re being disingenuous. Dak Still has the ball in his hand in this frame and I’m sorry but this is a little more than just “NFL open.” He’s open open. Certainly more than Cooks(or whoever the bottom WR is).
 

LXHaT8V.jpeg

You thinking the head coach forces the QB to throw to a certain WR, regardless of coverage is wild. So all the other route runners are aware that they aren’t getting the ball right? Because the HC tells them they aren’t? So the energy they spend running those routes and the frustration from CD when he doesn’t get the target is all just oscar worthy acting huh? We luck out with the top 10 actors among NFL TEs and WRs every year do we? 

Edited by DaBoys
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why did CD Lamb vent to his mommy about being frustrated with Dak, who then took to Facebook to vent herself, if CD knows this is all McCarthys fault? Surely he knows Dak is forced to throw to certain WRs against his will. 
 

https://www.the-sun.com/sport/10092214/dak-prescott-ceedee-lamb-mike-mccarthy-packers-cowboys/amp/

The Packers scored a touchdown on the first drive of the blockbuster NFL playoff clash at AT&T Stadium with running back Aaron Jones reaching the end zone to open the scoring.

In contrast, the Cowboys didn't hold onto the ball for long after their offense got out on the field for the first time.

Dallas had to punt after just six plays, the last being an incompletion from Prescott on a short pass to Lamb through the middle.

Not long after, the Fox Sports broadcast showed a clip of the two Cowboys stars exchanging words as they walked off the field after the disappointing drive.

Dallas fell apart soon after with Prescott throwing two interceptions before the end of the first half.

The second turnover resulted in a pick-six by Packers safety Darnell Savage Jr. to fire Green Bay 27-0 ahead.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, TVScout said:

He was fired from GB because he and Aaron Rodgers didn't get along. The Packers underestimated Rodgers' arrogance and egotistical attitude while evaluating McCarthy's coaching limitations. There's a reason why they drafted Jordan Love shortly after and then dumped Rodgers. They got tired of his antics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, plan9misfit said:

......... dumped Rodgers.

He was traded because they didn't want to pay 2 starting QBs at the same time.  Repeat of the Favre saga.

 

9 hours ago, plan9misfit said:

There's a reason why they drafted Jordan Love ...............

See above, they wanted to replace an ageing QB before it was too late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, TVScout said:

He was traded because they didn't want to pay 2 starting QBs at the same time.  Repeat of the Favre saga.

 

See above, they wanted to replace an ageing QB before it was too late.

And they also dumped Favre because they tired of his retirement/unretirement antics. Good God, man. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, TVScout said:

Then why did the packers sign Rodgers to that huge contract extension in 2022?

https://www.packers.com/news/packers-sign-qb-aaron-rodgers-to-contract-extension-march-2022

You just validated my point. They dumped him because they were tired of his antics and attitude. It had less to do with McCarthy’s incompetence and more to do with Rodgers being a d0uche.

Edited by plan9misfit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, plan9misfit said:

You just validated my point.

How? No company will intentionally llose $100 million. I f they wanted to get rid of him there would have been no extension at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why did the Packers trade Aaron Rodgers to the Jets? Jordan Love, salary cap led to Green Bay deal.

Near the bottom of the article there is this:

Logistics aside, it seems like the Packers are ready to move on from Rodgers. Long-time Packers reporter Bob McGinn reported that the team had grown "disgusted" with Rodgers thanks, in part, to his antics in consecutive offseasons. This included his 2021 holdout and his lengthy decision-making process in 2022, which resulted in him getting a record contract.

That is a distant second in importance because it was printed near the bottom. If Love didn't work GB would have kept Rodgers and put up with his misbehavior. other wise the team would have suffered double digit losses with the coaching staff and managers getting fired. Putting up with a prima donna is vastly preferable  to losing multi million dollar salaries.

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/news/aaron-rodgers-jets-packers-trade-jordan-love-salary-cap/pj2xaowqip8pldtguulwa9ll

Asked whether there's any scenario in which Rodgers is Green Bay's starting quarterback next season, Murphy said, "Yeah, I mean unless, if things don't work out the way we want them, yeah, we would. He is obviously a great player."

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/news/aaron-rodgers-trade-rumors-packers-ceo/old4krcma396nyze96chkdaw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/29/2024 at 9:05 AM, TVScout said:

Why did the Packers trade Aaron Rodgers to the Jets? Jordan Love, salary cap led to Green Bay deal.

Near the bottom of the article there is this:

Logistics aside, it seems like the Packers are ready to move on from Rodgers. Long-time Packers reporter Bob McGinn reported that the team had grown "disgusted" with Rodgers thanks, in part, to his antics in consecutive offseasons. This included his 2021 holdout and his lengthy decision-making process in 2022, which resulted in him getting a record contract.

That is a distant second in importance because it was printed near the bottom. If Love didn't work GB would have kept Rodgers and put up with his misbehavior. other wise the team would have suffered double digit losses with the coaching staff and managers getting fired. Putting up with a prima donna is vastly preferable  to losing multi million dollar salaries.

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/news/aaron-rodgers-jets-packers-trade-jordan-love-salary-cap/pj2xaowqip8pldtguulwa9ll

Asked whether there's any scenario in which Rodgers is Green Bay's starting quarterback next season, Murphy said, "Yeah, I mean unless, if things don't work out the way we want them, yeah, we would. He is obviously a great player."

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/news/aaron-rodgers-trade-rumors-packers-ceo/old4krcma396nyze96chkdaw

Please. They dropped him because they tired of his antics. To even consider using the statement is bold is laughable because Love didn't play. They had no idea whether he would "work" or not until last season, which was after they traded Rodgers. Get your facts straight. Rodgers drove the split, not Love.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TVScout said:

Then why did they sign Rodgers to a 3 year $150 M extension in 2022?

It's called leverage. He knew that he had it, so used it. Dude, seriously, do you understand anything about the business side of this sport?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...