Xmad Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 1 minute ago, Counselor said: I think we should get a hard deadline for RFA if we don’t have one March 13th. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 1 minute ago, SwoleXmad said: March 13th. Thanks bub Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 Trade Block (Come with offers) Andrew Norwell Shaquem Griffin Rasheem Green Trumaine Johnson Sam Hubbard Ronald Blair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 2 hours ago, MD4L said: Well like you said about @wwhickok, it’s a great learning experience for yourself as a trade committee member. This trade doesn’t destroy balance of the leauge which is the only time a veto should truly be of use. 1 hour ago, Counselor said: I retract my approval. Take me off this committee. It’s cutthroat business No, I'll let him back out if he wants. It's ridiculous that you both essentially vetoed, and I dont remember anyone else letting someone bail on a trade that some felt wasnt perfectly balanced, including deals for QBs, but I'll let him do it regardless. Even though it in NO WAY harms the competitive balance of the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 1 minute ago, Ragnarok said: No, I'll let him back out if he wants. It's ridiculous that you both essentially vetoed, and I dont remember anyone else letting someone bail on a trade that some felt wasnt perfectly balanced, including deals for QBs, but I'll let him do it regardless. Even though it in NO WAY harms the competitive balance of the league. That’s up to you bud Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 2 minutes ago, Counselor said: That’s up to you bud No, you two vetoed via abstaining and through big enough fits that he feels like he has to try to back out. Not up to me, you really gave me no choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 Just now, Ragnarok said: No, you two vetoed via abstaining and through big enough fits that he feels like he has to try to back out. Not up to me, you really gave me no choice. It’s your right to feel that way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 2 hours ago, Counselor said: But it was not yet approved? So you are going to stick him with the trade? 2 hours ago, Counselor said: I retract my approval. Take me off this committee. It’s cutthroat business Considering it's what you said, it's not how I feel, it is your exact words. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 Just now, Ragnarok said: Considering it's what you said, it's not how I feel, it is your exact words. Alright Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MD4L Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 26 minutes ago, Ragnarok said: No, I'll let him back out if he wants. It's ridiculous that you both essentially vetoed, and I dont remember anyone else letting someone bail on a trade that some felt wasnt perfectly balanced, including deals for QBs, but I'll let him do it regardless. Even though it in NO WAY harms the competitive balance of the league. If this wasn’t a newbie, it’s a nonstory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xmad Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 I think we should put a trade lock on a team for 2 weeks for new owners or something to prevent this kind of stuff (Exceptions being, mid season and extenuating circumstances etc.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 1 minute ago, SwoleXmad said: I think we should put a trade lock on a team for 2 weeks for new owners or something to prevent this kind of stuff (Exceptions being, mid season and extenuating circumstances etc.) Says the guy who just made two trades with the new guy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 9 minutes ago, MD4L said: If this wasn’t a newbie, it’s a nonstory. I would at least understand where yall were coming from if I approached him, if I made the offers, if I actively like took advantage of someone. I told him that I'd want at least a 1st and a player for Evans based on draft status and play over last year. That offer was his response. And I fail to see how them being a newbie alters the standard of detrimental to the balance of the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MD4L Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 Just now, Ragnarok said: I would at least understand where yall were coming from if I approached him, if I made the offers, if I actively like took advantage of someone. I told him that I'd want at least a 1st and a player for Evans based on draft status and play over last year. That offer was his response. And I fail to see how them being a newbie alters the standard of detrimental to the balance of the league. I never formally vetoed. I said I would not approve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 4 minutes ago, MD4L said: I never formally vetoed. I said I would not approve. That's a crap excuse and we all know it. A nonvote is the equivalent of a veto. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts