SwAg Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 You seem to think I’m calling you out for switching to tk3, let me be absolutely clear: I do not care that you switched. The aftermath has been absolutely egregious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 1 hour ago, Dome said: Player Voting to Lynch (Leader Bolded) Nazgul Malfatron Tk3 Nazgul pickle rick squire Malfatron squire Woz theuntouchable the orca theuntouchable mission Tk3 squire Tk3 swag Tk3 theuntouchable James 1 hour ago, Tk3 said: I'm a fruit vendor. I can pass gifts to others in the night. I'll send it to an active player who can vouch. tk3 had 3 votes. if he voted squire or touch, the vote would be tied. if there is a tie in overtime, the next person to break the tie and put someone in the lead would be lynched. swag could not break the tie, because his vote was on tk3 already. tk3 might have claimed so he could later "clear" himself later today. or he might be civ. i thought it was worth the risk because i envisioned a scenario where a mafia fruit vendor might exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 2 minutes ago, Malfatron said: tk3 had 3 votes. if he voted squire or touch, the vote would be tied. if there is a tie in overtime, the next person to break the tie and put someone in the lead would be lynched. swag could not break the tie, because his vote was on tk3 already. tk3 might have claimed so he could later "clear" himself later today. or he might be civ. i thought it was worth the risk because i envisioned a scenario where a mafia fruit vendor might exist. It’s more likely that it wouldn’t be a mafia vendor but it’s hard to just trust it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 Just now, theuntouchable said: It’s more likely that it wouldn’t be a mafia vendor but it’s hard to just trust it. thats true. but it was worth the risk to me on d1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Orca Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 @theuntouchable What do you think of Woz? Seems a tad lacking on content from what I remember of his usual posts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickle Rick Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 15 minutes ago, The Orca said: So who is gonna win...Swag or Malf in this arguement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Orca Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 2 minutes ago, theuntouchable said: It’s more likely that it wouldn’t be a mafia vendor but it’s hard to just trust it. What kind of mafia fruit vendor would there be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 Woz did incorrectly mark me down as having two posts yesterday, when really I only had my signup post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 I think we read that rule differently. I read it the same way tk3 read it. I didn’t read it as an overtime period with a one vote swing, I read it as basically a time snipe:!first player to have reached that total is the lynch. That’s what I was taunting tk3 with. But I think your construction is probably right: “to take” vs “who took” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Orca Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 Just now, Pickle Rick said: Tk3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 @SwAg you should read all of orcas posts after tk3 claimed tell me what you think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickle Rick Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 @Malfatron why did you bail on your strongest read for someone who claimed. Squire had not claimed and was still cementing a scum read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 1 minute ago, SwAg said: I think we read that rule differently. I read it the same way tk3 read it. I didn’t read it as an overtime period with a one vote swing, I read it as basically a time snipe:!first player to have reached that total is the lynch. That’s what I was taunting tk3 with. But I think your construction is probably right: “to take” vs “who took” that would explain tk3s claim then. probably more likely scenario that tk3 is civ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 Even if I remove that, the point remains since there is ample evidence that tk3 and J contemporaneously thought the rule was what I explained. But, I’m willing to let that go. Even with that excluded, I’m not sure the subsequent arguments did you any favors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 Just now, SwAg said: Even if I remove that, the point remains since there is ample evidence that tk3 and J contemporaneously thought the rule was what I explained. But, I’m willing to let that go. Even with that excluded, I’m not sure the subsequent arguments did you any favors. i dont really care. if im lynched, so be it. did you go back and read orcas posts after tk3s claim like i asked you to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.