Jump to content

Build Aaron Rodgers' Ideal Pass Catching Corps


incognito_man

Recommended Posts

Just now, Packerraymond said:

Yup, not his best year, needs to get back that deep ball, but outside of the state of Cali, he played well enough to win it all.

Played like crap in the state of Illinois.

Played like crap in the state of Michigan.

Played like crap in the state of Minnesota.

Played pretty mediocre in the state of Texas.

Had 2/8 games with a passer rating over 100 in the state of Wisconsin, and only 1 over 102. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, AlexGreen#20 said:

His name is in the title of the thread. It's not derailing a thread to talk about him. 

You two are in here for the following reason:

Random poster "I think player X would be a good fit."

You or Outpost "Rodgers wouldn't use player X, he doesn't throw to that type of player."

So enlighten us, answer the the damn thread question then.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AlexGreen#20 said:

The rest of the offense was just fine. Played pretty damn well even. This wasn't a game where the receivers weren't open or the line failed him. This was a game where Rodgers ******* collapsed under pressure. 

The run defense played like crap, but the CBs, the Smiths, Clark, even Martinez all played fine. The coaching staff let down guys. 

We've already gone through this drive by drive in the first half. Where was this evident at all other than the fumbled snap? The interception when we were already down 20? 

How was his performance against SF any different than Mahomes except that Mahomes played like **** for 3 quarters instead of 2 and when he finally turned it on his defense had kept the game within 10 points instead of being down 27?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AlexGreen#20 said:

Played like crap in the state of Illinois.

Played like crap in the state of Michigan.

Played like crap in the state of Minnesota.

Played pretty mediocre in the state of Texas.

Had 2/8 games with a passer rating over 100 in the state of Wisconsin, and only 1 over 102. 

 

13-3, one game from the superbowl and played like crap ... how did it ever happen?  Just give it up, just give it up.  The message is old and nobody cares any more.  It is what it is and the Packer brass isn't going to hire you to fix the "problem".  Rant on if you must. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, coachbuns said:

13-3, one game from the superbowl and played like crap ... how did it ever happen?  Just give it up, just give it up.  The message is old and nobody cares any more.  It is what it is and the Packer brass isn't going to hire you to fix the "problem".  Rant on if you must. 

Everyone else but Aaron Rodgers on the 2019 Packers was good. That's the post you're going to get back.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Packerraymond said:

You two are in here for the following reason:

Random poster "I think player X would be a good fit."

You or Outpost "Rodgers wouldn't use player X, he doesn't throw to that type of player."

So enlighten us, answer the the damn thread question then.

Adams, Cooper, Sanders is what you would build with the salary cap turned off. We're just not going to spend 40 million on a receiving corps this year. 

Building a WR corps that's good enough to keep this thing moving at an elite level with a QB who throws one of the lowerst percentage of passes to receivers between the numbers and within 15 yards of the LOS is a helluva task to ask for. 

On the first video that I posted, does swapping out Sanders for Allison fix anything about that play? Of course not. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, coachbuns said:

13-3, one game from the superbowl and played like crap ... how did it ever happen?  Just give it up, just give it up.  The message is old and nobody cares any more.  It is what it is and the Packer brass isn't going to hire you to fix the "problem".  Rant on if you must. 

We were a 10-6 level team in actuality who got ridiculously lucky in close games and with injuries.

We had a 10-6 level roster with a 9-7 level QB.

Then we got to the playoffs and needed our 9-7 level QB to play like an 11-5/12-4 QB, and he regressed to a 5-11 QB in the game that we needed him. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AlexGreen#20 said:

Adams, Cooper, Sanders is what you would build with the salary cap turned off. We're just not going to spend 40 million on a receiving corps this year. 

Building a WR corps that's good enough to keep this thing moving at an elite level with a QB who throws one of the lowerst percentage of passes to receivers between the numbers and within 15 yards of the LOS is a helluva task to ask for. 

On the first video that I posted, does swapping out Sanders for Allison fix anything about that play? Of course not. 

 

So the entire NFL front office group, our FO, all media and all our fan base other than you and Outpost can't see the light?

If you need to build a Madden 90+ rating WR group for a QB to be effective that is a bottom 10 QB in the league.

Year 2 in a system, healthy EQ in camp, added off-season with MVS, adding a FA WR the caliber of Taylor Gabriel and adding a day 1-2 pick at WR should be enough, or Aaron Rodgers shouldn't be a HOF QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, packfanfb said:

We've already gone through this drive by drive in the first half. Where was this evident at all other than the fumbled snap? The interception when we were already down 20? 

How was his performance against SF any different than Mahomes except that Mahomes played like **** for 3 quarters instead of 2 and when he finally turned it on his defense had kept the game within 10 points instead of being down 27?

In the first half? The difference was 10 points and 2 turnovers?

How are these comparable halves?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Packerraymond said:

So the entire NFL front office group, our FO, all media and all our fan base other than you and Outpost can't see the light?

If you need to build a Madden 90+ rating WR group for a QB to be effective that is a bottom 10 QB in the league.

Year 2 in a system, healthy EQ in camp, added off-season with MVS, adding a FA WR the caliber of Taylor Gabriel and adding a day 1-2 pick at WR should be enough, or Aaron Rodgers shouldn't be a HOF QB.

If we're judging Aaron Rodgers exclusively off of his performance the last five years, Aaron Rodgers should not be a HOF QB!!!!!

He has a sub 100 passer rating over the last five seasons.

The Packers have finished 15th (16 games), 14th(16 games), 21st(7 games), 4th (16 games), and 15th (16 games) in points scored over the last five seasons. 

Edited by AlexGreen#20
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AlexGreen#20 said:

If we're judging Aaron Rodgers exclusively off of his performance the last five years, Aaron Rodgers should not be a HOF QB!!!!!

He has a sub 100 passer rating over the last five seasons.

The Packers have finished 15th (16 games), 14th(16 games), 21st(7 games), 4th (16 games), and 15th (16 games) in points scored over the last five seasons. 

Gotcha. Well this is where I stop wasting my time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Packerraymond said:

Gotcha. Well this is where I stop wasting my time.

He's been a top 5 QB in how many of the last five years? 1? in 2016.

There's not a single aspect of Rodgers game that's proven to be elite over the past 5 years other than not throwing interceptions. And not throwing those interceptions have often come at the cost of offensive production in recent years.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, packfanfb said:

Mahomes threw 2 picks. I guess we can split hairs over when they occurred. Bigger difference was, the Chiefs played some defense, we didnt.

Packers offensive drives in the first half went:

5 plays

5 plays

3 plays

6 plays

4 plays

3 plays.

If our offense had held the ball for longer than 3:30 on a single drive, and not left the defense starting in their own territory twice, it would have been easier to play defense. 

Neither of Mahomes picks started the 49ers on the wrong side of midfield. 

The 49ers only had 4 offensive drives in the first half of the super bowl, the Cheifs offense killed a ton of clock just by manufacturing drives. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, packfanfb said:

We've already gone through this drive by drive in the first half. Where was this evident at all other than the fumbled snap?

When he threw to Williams and not Graham when he didn't look at the ILB that killed a drive.

When he decided to hold the ball an extra second and a half rather than throwing to Allison when he was open that led to a killed drive.  

When he didn't throw to Jones on the slant when Jones was open that killed a drive.

When he decided he would rather sit with his thumb up his *** for four seconds while requiring 6 blocks to take on 6 rushers in a blitz setting so he could throw a bomb to Davante rather than taking the easy first down that killed a drive.

When he decided he was too much of a chicken **** to throw the inside slant to Davante with an ILB crashing in, even though he knew that the ILB would be crashing in because Adams was the only target on that side of the field that led to a killed drive. 

When he decided his stats were more important and would rather take the penalty than put the incompletion on his stats and throw the screen pass away, that killed a drive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...