SwAg Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 2 minutes ago, Malfatron said: bucs rules 1. Leave personal attacks out of the game. Absolutely. We're not tolerating bringing up things from outside the game/site; be it social media, other websites, "real life," A. I didnt give a personal attack B. It says "other websites", nothing about FF in general. Please tell me, what portion of “etc” is indicative of a finite list? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Orca Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 What is Swag even talking about? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 Please tell me, why did we have months of endless tropes about keeping games self-contained? Were those interpretations of the rules by Forum Mods not precedential? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 1 minute ago, SwAg said: I have already addressed this too. Your disingenuous attempts and refusal to read, in accordance with accepted tenets of textual interpretation, is not convincing. the forward slash can mean exclusive or inclusive "or" so for not bringing thing out of game/site, i interpreted that to mean accordance with either one (in my case, "site") would be okay. However, that is in the past. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Orca Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 11 minutes ago, bcb1213 said: Sup Hey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 Just now, The Orca said: What is Swag even talking about? Malfatron’s wanton disregard for decency in Mafia. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 Just now, Malfatron said: the forward slash can mean exclusive or inclusive "or" so for not bringing thing out of game/site, i interpreted that to mean accordance with either one (in my case, "site") would be okay. However, that is in the past. Lmao. You took a prohibition rule to convey authorization. Please, sit down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 What was it Ice Cube said? Check yourself before you wreck yourself? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 These retroactive justifications after acknowledging you acted inappropriately are hilarious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 1 minute ago, SwAg said: Lmao. You took a prohibition rule to convey authorization. Please, sit down. You are missed the common sense factor of how my post didnt violate the purpose behind this rule Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 1 minute ago, SwAg said: These retroactive justifications after acknowledging you acted inappropriately are hilarious. You are exploiting semantic information associated with the concepts involved in the rules. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 “I excluded the portion of the rule that didn’t fit what I wanted to do. So, I changed its core meaning from a prohibition on behavior to dictating acceptable behavior that I wanted to do.” - Malfatron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Orca Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 4 minutes ago, SwAg said: Malfatron’s wanton disregard for decency in Mafia. What did he say? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 Just now, The Orca said: What did he say? That buff has watched the marvel movies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 1 minute ago, Malfatron said: You are missed the common sense factor of how my post didnt violate the purpose behind this rule Lmao. It violated the letter of the rule, and the purpose of the rule. Make this your fifth or sixth failed justification. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.