RedGold Posted February 8, 2022 Share Posted February 8, 2022 2 minutes ago, EaglesPeteC said: At least buy me dinner first, or trade me a pick It’s a fact the more Lemon Ups you eat, the more picks you have 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted February 9, 2022 Share Posted February 9, 2022 (edited) Enjoy.. FYI, if you didn't make the list, it's because you don't currently have said Position on your roster. Early Post Season Position Rankings Quarterback1. Aaron Rodgers2. Pat Mahomes3. Josh Allen4. ,Joe Burrow5. Matthew Stafford6. Russell Wilson7. Justin Herbert8. Dak Prescott9. Desean Watson10. Kyler Murray11. Mac Jones12. Ryan Tannehil13. Tua Tagovailoa14. Jalen Hurts15. Zach Wilson16. Jake FrommRunning Back 1. Nick Chubb/Ezekiel Elliot2. Derrick Henry3. Najee Harris/D'Andre Swift4. Jonathan Taylor5. Alvin Kamara6. Dalvin Cook7. Joe Mixon8. Aaron Jones/Rhamondre Stevens9. Javonte Williams10. Austin Ekeler11. CEH/Kareem Hunt12. David Montgomery13. Josh Jacobs14. Michael Carter15. AJ Dillon16. Saquon Barkley/Cam AkersWide Receiver1. Anchorage2. NOLA3. Gotham4. Hungary 5. Camden6. Antartica7. Berlin8. Rome9. Cancun10. Cuba11. DVN12. Raleigh13. Singapore14. Seoul15. Ivory Coast16. LancasterTight End1. Seoul2. Gotham3. Berlin4. Anchorage5. Camden6. Raleigh7. Singapore8. DVN9. ICBR10. Cancun11. Rome12. Antartica13. Hungary14. CubaOffensive Tackle1. ICBR2. Anchorage3. Camden4. Seoul5. Berlin6. Gotham7. Lancaster8. Raleigh9. Antartica10. NOLA11. Sinapore12. DVN13. Rome14. Hungary15. Cuba16. CancunOffensive Guard1. Seoul 2. Rome3. Lancaster4. ICBR5. Camden6. Raleigh7. DVN8. Cuba9. Anchorage10. NOLA11. Gotham12. Singapore13. Hungary14. Antartica15. CancunCenter1. DVN2. Berlin3. Cuba4. Camden5. Anchorage6. Antartica7. Raleigh8. Gotham9. ICBR10. Rome11. Hungary12. Cancun13. Seoul14. SingaporeEdge1. ICBR2. Berlin3. DVN4. Cuba5. Cancun6. Camden7. Gotham8. Anchorage9. Antartica10. Singapore11. Lancaster12. Rome13. Hungary14. NOLA15. Seoul16. RaleighINT1. Singapore 2. DVN3. NOLA4. Anchorage5. Berlin6. ICBR7. Lancaster8. Gotham9. Camden10. Raleigh11. Rome12. Cancun13. Antartica 14. Seoul15. Cuba16. HungaryLinebacker1. Hungary2. Rome3. Anchorage4. Berlin5. Cancun6. Cuba7. Antartica 8. ICBR9. Lancaster10. Camden11. Raleigh12. Singapore13. NOLA14. DVN15. GothamCornerback1. ICBR2. Anchorage3. Camden4. Berlin5. Raleigh6. Rome7. Gotham8. Cancun9. Lancaster10. Singapore11. NOLA12. DVN13. Cuba14. Hungary15. Seoul16. AntarticaSafety1. Hungary2. Lancaster3. Berlin4. DVN5. Singapore6. Anchorage 7. NOLA8. Cuba9. Raleigh10. Camden11. ICBR12. Cancun13. Rome14. Seoul15. Gotham16. Antartica Edited February 9, 2022 by wwhickok 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EaglesPeteC Posted February 9, 2022 Share Posted February 9, 2022 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted February 9, 2022 Share Posted February 9, 2022 40 minutes ago, wwhickok said: Enjoy.. FYI, if you didn't make the list, it's because you don't currently have said Position on your roster. Early Post Season Position Rankings Quarterback1. Aaron Rodgers - AgreedRunning Back 14. Michael Carter - Yeah, I can't argue too much with that at the moment.Wide Receiver7. Berlin - Also fair.Tight End3. Berlin - I'd take my TEs top to bottom over any team in BDL.Offensive Tackle5. Berlin - No way Kolton and Wirfs are this low.Offensive Guard Yeah....need to fix this.Center2. Berlin - Agreed.Edge2. Berlin - I have to figure out what to do with Za'Darius.INT5. Berlin - Fair if a little low imo.Linebacker4. Berlin - FairCornerback4. Berlin - FairSafety3. Berlin - Fair This just makes me think I should go for the repeat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted February 9, 2022 Share Posted February 9, 2022 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Ragnarok said: This just makes me think I should go for the repeat. It's not that think that little of your OTs, it also came down to amount of quality depth and behind the two of them, you had none. I took the whole position group into account. When it comes to INT, I mean I guess that's debatable, but I think the top 2 are a lock in that ranking. Edited February 9, 2022 by wwhickok Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted February 9, 2022 Share Posted February 9, 2022 Just now, wwhickok said: It's not that think that little of your OTs, it also came down to amount of quality depth and behind the two of them, you had none. I took the whole position group into account. That's fair. But by that standard, Goedert and Henry should be #1 at TE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted February 9, 2022 Share Posted February 9, 2022 1 minute ago, Ragnarok said: That's fair. But by that standard, Goedert and Henry should be #1 at TE. That's a fair point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted February 9, 2022 Share Posted February 9, 2022 5 minutes ago, Ragnarok said: This just makes me think I should go for the repeat. I mean you could try. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted February 9, 2022 Share Posted February 9, 2022 4 minutes ago, Ragnarok said: That's fair. But by that standard, Goedert and Henry should be #1 at TE. I’d rather have Kelce and Freiermuth 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted February 9, 2022 Share Posted February 9, 2022 I miss underdog season. 16th ranked QB, 15th ranked RB... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted February 9, 2022 Share Posted February 9, 2022 6 minutes ago, wwhickok said: That's a fair point. 4 minutes ago, Scoundrel said: I’d rather have Kelce and Freiermuth I can see the argument for Kelce and Freiermuth. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted February 9, 2022 Share Posted February 9, 2022 I also think NOLA receivers are above mine. Not sure where I would rank mine. Exciting young playmakers but still some depth work needed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted February 9, 2022 Share Posted February 9, 2022 4 minutes ago, Scoundrel said: I’d rather have Kelce and Freiermuth I mean that's the way I looked at it. That is a dominant and more consistent duo than the other choices, so tbh, at best, Berlin would move to #2. QB was a debate for me also. The ONLY reason I put Rodgers at 1 is because Rags was voted to a Bizz Bowl win. The best QB in the NFL is Pat Mahomes and from there it becomes a debate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedGold Posted February 9, 2022 Share Posted February 9, 2022 (edited) Can’t argue with many of mine. I think Center is low. Tackle and Guard might be a little too high though. Shoutout to Lancaster for getting my vote at Int. Edit: wait he fixed it. I agree with Int Edited February 9, 2022 by RedGold 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted February 9, 2022 Share Posted February 9, 2022 I’d also rank my TE lower. Pitts has special potential but still needs to show more inline and Tremble has potential but needs to show much more. Those are the only two I have so missing some depth. Just now, wwhickok said: I mean that's the way I looked at it. That is a dominant and more consistent duo than the other choices, so tbh, at best, Berlin would move to #2. QB was a debate for me also. The ONLY reason I put Rodgers at 1 is because Rags was voted to a Bizz Bowl win. The best QB in the NFL is Pat Mahomes and from there it becomes a debate. I’d definitely put Berlin #2 at TE. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.