BDL 2024 Contract Negotiations/Transactions

[InjuredReserve]

8 minutes ago, Scoundrel said:

Can we give Blue his guy? I trust he sent it in on time and he isn’t in the discord to read that you guys asked for new PMs each week unless it’s posted on FF and I just am too lazy to check 

I'm not against it. But just to be clear, I accepted defeat and didn't get my guy 2 weeks ago. Bcb can attest to that.

[InjuredReserve]

We gotta start a weekly recap of Discord key events in here for Blue so he isn't screwed over.

[Scoundrel]

1 minute ago, InjuredReserve said:

I'm not against it. But just to be clear, I accepted defeat and didn't get my guy 2 weeks ago. Bcb can attest to that.

Well that’s precedent then 

[InjuredReserve]

13 minutes ago, Scoundrel said:

Well that’s precedent then 

I honestly think the precedent could still be set. Bcb did offer me to go to the group. I just didn't want to make waves.

If Blue wants his guy. I am happy to say I'm OK with it. And if other owners are cool I say do it.

Just adding context.

[Blue]

Just now, bcb1213 said:

Eventually my inbox got full and I deleted all old convos

Then say that. Don't just accept the claims for three weeks and then go, "oopsies, deleted your old PM, too bad!"

Just now, Scoundrel said:

Can we give Blue his guy? I trust he sent it in on time and he isn’t in the discord to read that you guys asked for new PMs each week unless it’s posted on FF and I just am too lazy to check 

It's two guys since Justin Jones went on IR earlier this week. Doesn't change any of the claims made, either.

[InjuredReserve]

5 minutes ago, Blue said:

Then say that. Don't just accept the claims for three weeks and then go, "oopsies, deleted your old PM, too bad!"

It's two guys since Justin Jones went on IR earlier this week. Doesn't change any of the claims made, either.

Not impacting other claims honestly makes this super easy. Bc I feel like the only real pushback would be if an owner would lose their claimed guy.

[TL-TwoWinsAway]

6 minutes ago, InjuredReserve said:

Not impacting other claims honestly makes this super easy. Bc I feel like the only real pushback would be if an owner would lose their claimed guy.

My thoughts exactly. Seems like a misunderstanding and it doesn't change anything for anyone else.

[RedGold]

Umm I think spreadsheet is all updated now 

[PR]

7 hours ago, Blue said:

I could not care less given he continued to accept waivers on the same DM for three weeks.

Follow the rules and don't be a schmuck. BCB made it clear before the first waivers that he wanted a new waiver for each week. It was your decision to buck the rules because you just didn't feel like doing what was requested. He should skip your waiver claim on precedent. Don't act like you are above the rules. 

[PR]

6 hours ago, InjuredReserve said:

We gotta start a weekly recap of Discord key events in here for Blue so he isn't screwed over.

That again is Blue's choice to not use the communications used by the majority of the league.

[BodyBurner]

I’m not sure if I get a vote but if I do the  Blue doesn’t get a redo. I vote no. There are a dozen ways to handle something like this and calling bcb out publicly is the wrong way. 

[Blue]

2 hours ago, PR said:

That again is Blue's choice to not use the communications used by the majority of the league.

Being in the Discord is optional. Choosing to state it in one place where you know not everyone will see it is a ****ty thing to do.

[PR]

30 minutes ago, Blue said:

Being in the Discord is optional. Choosing to state it in one place where you know not everyone will see it is a ****ty thing to do.

You can literally see in your inbox message if there is one or two people active in the inbox conversation. Just take accountability. It's not that freaking hard man. 

[Blue]

3 minutes ago, PR said:

You can literally see in your inbox message if there is one or two people active in the inbox conversation. Just take accountability. It's not that freaking hard man. 

If you had read anything I had posted here, you would know that BCB was still in that inbox conversation for the previous three weeks. Don't ******* lecture me about accountability.

[PR]

3 minutes ago, Blue said:

If you had read anything I had posted here, you would know that BCB was still in that inbox conversation for the previous three weeks. Don't ******* lecture me about accountability.

So because you decided to not listen to the rules in the first place and you haven't paid attention to your inbox on whether BCB continues to be in the conversation for the past month you get to be pissed at someone else for not catering to your wishes. Be accountable. Look at the top of the message like everyone else so you aren't talking to the void. It's not that difficult and it's also not difficult to say... man I ****ed up here, I'll shoot you a new inbox message next week so this doesn't happen again.

Instead you get pissed off at BCB for you being the only one not knowing the rules and you are mad at him for deleting an old inbox message which you then responded too again after he had already left. You still can't admit when you are wrong.