MaddHatter Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 48 minutes ago, matt79511 said: This team loves them a 2nd round EDGE eh Off the charts athleticism + strong run defense profile is a plus. I like that they didn't force a need at RB or LB even though they could have. This feels like a McClay pick. Wilson is a Top 50 pick so don’t feel like that’s forcing it at all Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plan9misfit Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 Totally unexpected pick, but I also thought he would’ve been off the board before our pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nextyearfordaboyz Posted April 29 Share Posted April 29 I haven’t been able to watch him yet, but it sounds like most people really feel like he was a top-32 player in this draft. No-brainer over Benson, if that’s the case. If he can provide depth this year and adequately replace Tank in 2025, that’s an easy choice over the RB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaddHatter Posted April 30 Share Posted April 30 Maybe a fringe Top 50 but no way he was Top 30 NFLDraftBuzz: 72nd overall CBS Sports: 65th overall WalterFootball: 89th overall Daniel Jeremiah: 45th overall ProFootballFocus: 63rd overall WideLeft: 60th overall NFLMDD: 58th overall Drafted: 48th overall SportingNews: 66th overall I didn't find a single site with him Top 32 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt79511 Posted April 30 Share Posted April 30 1 hour ago, MaddHatter said: Maybe a fringe Top 50 but no way he was Top 30 NFLDraftBuzz: 72nd overall CBS Sports: 65th overall WalterFootball: 89th overall Daniel Jeremiah: 45th overall ProFootballFocus: 63rd overall WideLeft: 60th overall NFLMDD: 58th overall Drafted: 48th overall SportingNews: 66th overall I didn't find a single site with him Top 32 I think Dane Brugler had him exactly 32nd. He definitely wasn’t Top 32 on the consensus board though, closer to 60th Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaddHatter Posted April 30 Share Posted April 30 12 minutes ago, matt79511 said: I think Dane Brugler had him exactly 32nd. He definitely wasn’t Top 32 on the consensus board though, closer to 60th I show him 51st on Dane Brugler's BB as of 2/13/24 https://theathletic.com/5270481/2024/02/13/nfl-draft-2024-prospect-rankings-top-100/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt79511 Posted April 30 Share Posted April 30 12 minutes ago, MaddHatter said: I show him 51st on Dane Brugler's BB as of 2/13/24 https://theathletic.com/5270481/2024/02/13/nfl-draft-2024-prospect-rankings-top-100/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaddHatter Posted April 30 Share Posted April 30 1 hour ago, matt79511 said: Seems like quite the revisionist history on his part unless he has a Big Board since 2/14 that showed differently? That'd be quite the jump for Kneeland for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nextyearfordaboyz Posted April 30 Share Posted April 30 5 minutes ago, MaddHatter said: Seems like quite the revisionist history on his part unless he has a Big Board since 2/14 that showed differently? That'd be quite the jump for Kneeland for sure. His final draft guide published before the draft had Kneeland at #32. Maybe top-32 was a stretch. But quite a few of the top analysts had him top 50. Brugler (32), Danny Kelly (41), Daniel Jeremiah (45). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaddHatter Posted April 30 Share Posted April 30 1 minute ago, Nextyearfordaboyz said: His final draft guide published before the draft had Kneeland at #32. Maybe top-32 was a stretch. But quite a few of the top analysts had him top 50. Brugler (32), Danny Kelly (41), Daniel Jeremiah (45). Gotcha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nextyearfordaboyz Posted Tuesday at 01:46 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 01:46 PM Remember the “Will McClay doesn’t like small school players” thing. Sure doesn’t seem like that’s true, at least not anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.