fretgod99 Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 12 minutes ago, iPwn said: PFF Grades for base offense vs “expected” defense for that set. I can pull different packages if someone wants them. Trying to get it to put Hurns and Lee on there tho. Why you running a 1-3-3-4 base defense though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 26 minutes ago, iPwn said: The hell, man? Odds are I’m out for the game so wont be online much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, fretgod99 said: Why you running a 1-3-3-4 base defense though? No one would ever expect it lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Buzz Posted January 4, 2018 Author Share Posted January 4, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KhanYouDigIt Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 PFF really hates our O-Line lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Buzz Posted January 4, 2018 Author Share Posted January 4, 2018 3 minutes ago, KhanYouDigIt said: PFF really hates our O-Line lol Especially Cam Robinson. I don't get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KhanYouDigIt Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 Just now, .Buzz said: Especially Cam Robinson. I don't get it. I like their metrics for CB’s and what not but I have never liked their grading system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Buzz Posted January 4, 2018 Author Share Posted January 4, 2018 Just now, KhanYouDigIt said: I like their metrics for CB’s and what not but I have never liked their grading system. Same. I watch our OL pretty closely. Cam has had his problems/faults, especially since his ankle injury, but he has not been close to as bad as their grading system indicates each week. I'm no OL expert but good lord. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 37 minutes ago, .Buzz said: Cyprien do something dirty? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 25 minutes ago, KhanYouDigIt said: I like their metrics for CB’s and what not but I have never liked their grading system. You have to like the CB ones bc they grade them awesome lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwny Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 2 hours ago, fretgod99 said: Why you running a 1-3-3-4 base defense though? Why not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fretgod99 Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 Just now, iPwn said: Why not? Fair point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwny Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 9 hours ago, fretgod99 said: That’d be like starting Nathan Peterman at qb then getting upset when he throws 5 picks. That dude sucks outloud, so what else would you expect? He’s terrible at throwing things. What jackass thought he had any business starting a pro football game? Oh boy, do I have a thread for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwny Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 5 hours ago, fretgod99 said: Fair point. Maybe if we ran a 1-3-3-4 we wouldn’t have underachieved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwny Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 I really think this game will be won/lost on what Wash gameplans for the defense. If he lets the guys play tight, we walk this one up to Pittsburgh. If he brings some confusing looks for the offense to have to navigate, we win. If he calls off cover 3 and man all day with no deception, it’s gonna be tough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.