Jump to content

The Wire mafia - Game Over! The Barksdale Gang controls Baltimore!


Whicker

Recommended Posts

Just now, Ragnarok said:

Matts, I thought about all of those fun possibilities.  The way I played it was the best odds.  Bottom line.

And keeping touch alive was not why we lost.  At all.  

Like I said. I disagree. And I think you losing is indicative of that. I

But whatever; my team won.

UnevenAbsoluteIaerismetalmark-max-1mb.gi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Matts4313 said:

Like I said. I disagree. And I think you losing is indicative of that. I

But whatever; my team won.

UnevenAbsoluteIaerismetalmark-max-1mb.gi

This might be the worst attempt at logic I have ever seen here.  

You need to research correlation v causation.  Because it seems like you do not understand that at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ragnarok said:

What cost us was not enough interaction among scummates in the early part of the game.  We were too distant and it became obvious.  

That was the actual reason we lost.  Bottom line.  

You keep saying bottom line like that makes it true. 

I did notice the interaction thing. There was a point were you and squire both posted like 10ish post at the same time, and neither one of you responded to one post from the other guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Matts4313 said:

You keep saying bottom line like that makes it true. 

I did notice the interaction thing. There was a point were you and squire both posted like 10ish post at the same time, and neither one of you responded to one post from the other guy. 

How much of those reads did you point out and post about? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Matts4313 said:

You keep saying bottom line like that makes it true. 

I did notice the interaction thing. There was a point were you and squire both posted like 10ish post at the same time, and neither one of you responded to one post from the other guy. 

Because it is true.  

That wasn't the interaction part that was the issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ragnarok said:

This might be the worst attempt at logic I have ever seen here.  

You need to research correlation v causation.  Because it seems like you do not understand that at all.

I understand it completely. I get your argument. If you notice, I did not say it proves it. I didnt say it verified it. I am simply suggesting that I thought your choice was low odds and you wound up losing. 

UNT has also said he should have been hit.

Whicker via PM also said UNT should have been hit.

So thats 3 vetren players who all disagree with the way you played it. 

Bottom line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Matts4313 said:

I understand it completely. I get your argument. If you notice, I did not say it proves it. I didnt say it verified it. I am simply suggesting that I thought your choice was low odds and you wound up losing. 

UNT has also said he should have been hit.

Whicker via PM also said UNT should have been hit.

So thats 3 vetren players who all disagree with the way you played it. 

Bottom line. 

From his perspective, I could see why he played it the way he did because of my doubt on dingo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Matts4313 said:

I understand it completely. I get your argument. If you notice, I did not say it proves it. I didnt say it verified it. I am simply suggesting that I thought your choice was low odds and you wound up losing. 

UNT has also said he should have been hit.

Whicker via PM also said UNT should have been hit.

So thats 3 vetren players who all disagree with the way you played it. 

Bottom line. 

Just because you have signed up for a lot of games doesn't make you a veteran.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, theuntouchable said:

How much of those reads did you point out and post about? 

Some? Seeing as I had two hits, I was more keen to just hit people. I was watching more than anything. 

That particular interaction was once I was dead though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, theuntouchable said:

From his perspective, I could see why he played it the way he did because of my doubt on dingo. 

I understand it from his perspective as well. 

1 minute ago, Ragnarok said:

Just because you have signed up for a lot of games doesn't make you a veteran.

You are getting super defensive. You arent open to the possibility there was a better play? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...