VigilantZombie Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 2 minutes ago, Ragnarok said: And I will say this. Regardless of where the suggestion of cancelling the trade came from, you chose to act on it. It was your decision. Bottom line. I I agree with that. My point was only literally only that the only reason I even thought that was an option is it because it was suggested to me. It hadn't been something I was previously considering doing or wishing that I had done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 Just now, wwhickok said: I I agree with that. My point was only literally only that the only reason I even thought that was an option is it because it was suggested to me. It hadn't been something I was previously considering doing or wishing that I had done. Then repropose the trade with him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 Just now, Counselor said: Then repropose the trade with him I'm talking to him right now in pm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 6 minutes ago, wwhickok said: I I agree with that. My point was only literally only that the only reason I even thought that was an option is it because it was suggested to me. It hadn't been something I was previously considering doing or wishing that I had done. So, how about we drop that part? I think we have taken up more than too much thread space on this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 Just now, Ragnarok said: So, how about we drop that part? I think we have taken up more than too much thread space on this. I agree. I also need to realize that I have a co-owner for a reason and need to give him the chance to have a voice This situation is on me. Lesson Learned, I apologize for my actions and assure all of you i am not a repeat offender Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 Just now, wwhickok said: I agree. I also need to realize that I have a co-owner for a reason and need to give him the chance to have a voice This situation is on me. Lesson Learned, I apologize for my actions and assure all of you i am not a repeat offender I look forward to you proving this to be true and being a great owner for many seasons. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 (edited) I have a question and I'm sure I already read this in the rules but I'm super tired right now so it's just easier to ask this question out loud. When it comes to free agents and I understand the draft is before free agency but when it comes to free agents the amount we are offering them is that based on their real life contract? I should be clear that I'm talking about unrestricted free agents Hill did not receive a three up. Edited February 24, 2019 by wwhickok Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 2 minutes ago, wwhickok said: I have a question and I'm sure I already read this in the rules but I'm super tired right now so it's just easier to ask this question out loud. When it comes to free agents and I understand the draft is before free agency but when it comes to free agents the amount we are offering them is that based on their real life contract? I should be clear that I'm talking about unrestricted free agents Hill did not receive a three up. 50 percent of irl contract if five or more years then 60 percent 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 1 minute ago, Counselor said: 50 percent of irl contract if five or more years then 60 percent I do remember reading that. All right I'll look more into that tomorrow and refine some of my information Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted February 24, 2019 Author Share Posted February 24, 2019 6 hours ago, DingoLadd said: That Mahomes trade was made like BDL week 3 or 4 so it wasn't that bad at the time, hindsight....not good No it was bad then and I pointed it out. No one cared that a brand new owner had no idea the weight QBs carry in this league and how valuable a young one on a ridiculous contract is. So at this point if you guys thought that was non vetoable then no trade is IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringinDaPain Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 (edited) Breaking News!!! The Orlando Ospreys have moved to the Carolina's, with the move we are pleased to announce the new name change of the team will be the Carolina Intimidators.. Also note that Mike is listed as my co-GM please fix until I find a new one. @TedLavie Edited February 24, 2019 by BringinDaPain 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted February 24, 2019 Author Share Posted February 24, 2019 55 minutes ago, BringinDaPain said: Breaking News!!! The Orlando Ospreys have moved to the Carolina's, with the move we are pleased to announce the new name change of the team will be the Carolina Intimidators.. Also note that @samsel23 is the new co-owner of the team. @TedLavie Making mooooves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MD4L Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 2 hours ago, Jlash said: No it was bad then and I pointed it out. No one cared that a brand new owner had no idea the weight QBs carry in this league and how valuable a young one on a ridiculous contract is. So at this point if you guys thought that was non vetoable then no trade is IMO. It was awful. No other way to describe it. His reasoning was Mahomes was the only available QB (Mayfield+Rivers) on an unlocked deal. As we see now, the prior owner lasted for a short period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringinDaPain Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 1 minute ago, MD4L said: It was awful. No other way to describe it. His reasoning was Mahomes was the only available QB (Mayfield+Rivers) on an unlocked deal. As we see now, the prior owner lasted for a short period. I gotta ask since TJ Watt is on my roster. Was Mike the one that traded Mahomie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MD4L Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 2 minutes ago, BringinDaPain said: I gotta ask since TJ Watt is on my roster. Was Mike the one that traded Mahomie? Yup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts